Joint-Space Analysis of “pick-any” Data: Analysis of Choices from an Unconstrained Set of Alternatives | Psychometrika | Cambridge Core (original) (raw)

Abstract

Social and naturally occurring choice phenomena are often of the “pick-any” type in which the number of choices made by a subject as well as the set of alternatives from which they are chosen is unconstrained. These data present a special analytical problem because the meaning of non-choice among pick-any choice data is always ambiguous: A non-chosen alternative may be either unacceptable, or acceptable but not considered, or acceptable and considered but not chosen. A model and scaling method for these data are introduced, allowing for this ambiguity of non-choice. Subjects are represented as points whose coordinates are proportional to the centroids of the points representing their choices. Alternatives are represented at points whose coordinates are proportional to the centroids of the points representing subjects who have chosen them. This centroid scaling technique estimates multidimensional joint spaces from the pick-any data.

References

Mosteller, F. A theory of scalogram analysis, using noncumulative types of items: A new approach to Thurstone's method of scaling attitudes (Rep. No. 9), 1949, Cambridge, Mass: Lab. of Social Relations, Harvard University.Google Scholar

Carroll, J. D. Individual differences and multidimensional scalling. In Shepard, R. N., Romney, A. K. & Nerlove, S. B.(Eds.), Multidimensional scaling (Vol. I), 1972, New York: Seminar Press, Inc..Google Scholar

Coombs, C. H. The theory and method of social measurement. In Festinger, L. & Katz, D.(Eds.), Research methods in the behavioral sciences. New York: Dryden Press. 1953, 471–535.Google Scholar

Coombs, C. H. & Smith, J. E. K. On the detection of structure in attitudes and developmental processes. Psychological Review, 1973, 80, 337–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Green, B. F. Jr. Attitude measurement. In Lindzey, G.(Eds.), Handbook of social psychology, 1954, Cambridge, Mass.: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar

Levine, J. H. & Roy, W. S. A study of interlocking directorates. In Leinhardt, S.(Eds.), Symposium on social networks, 1976, New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Lingoes, J. C. A general survey of the Guttman-Lingoes nonmetric program series. In Shepard, R. N., Romney, A. K. & Nerlove, S. B.(Eds.), Multidimensional scaling (Vol. I, 1972, New York: Seminar Press, Inc..Google Scholar

March, J. G. & Simon, H. A. Cognitive limits on rationality, 1958, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Torgerson, W. S. Theory and methods of scaling, 1958, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

White, H. C., Boorman, S. A. & Breiger, R. U.Social structure from multiple networks: I. Block-models of roles and positions. American Journal of Sociology, 1976, 730-780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar