Measuring Polyarchy (original) (raw)
Abstract
The authors have developed a scale based on Robert Dahl’s concept of polyarchy. The scale measures the degree to which national political systems meet the minimum requirements for political democracy, where real-world “democracies” rather than abstract ideals are the, standard. The Polyarchy Scale is constructed from indicators of freedom of expression, freedom of organization, media pluralism, and the holding of fair elections. The scale is (1) well grounded in democratic theory, (2) world-wide in scope., (3) demonstrably valid, (4) solves problems of weighting indicators and (5) is easy to interpret and replicate., Some limitations in the scale's applicability are discussed and suggestions are made for improvements and future research.
Access this article
Subscribe and save
- Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
- Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
- Cancel anytime View plans
Buy Now
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
- ALEXANDER, ROBERT J., ed. 1982_Political parties of the Americas: Canada, Latin America, and the West Indies_. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Google Scholar - BANKS, ARTHUR S., ed. 1985_Political handbook of the world_. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Google Scholar - BANKS, ARTHUR S. and ROBERT B. TEXTOR 1963_A cross-polity survey_. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press.
Google Scholar - BOLLEN, KENNETH A. 1988 Political democracy: Conceptual and measurement traps, paper prepared for conference on “The Measurement of Democracy” held at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University, May 27–28, 1988.
- 0 1980 Issues in the comparative measurement of political democracy.American Sociological Review 45 (June): 370–390.
Article Google Scholar - DAHL, ROBERT A. 1971_Polyarchy: Participation and opposition_. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Google Scholar - 0 1982_Dilemmas of pluralist democracy_. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Google Scholar - DAHL, ROBERT A. and CHARLES LINDBLOM 1953_Politics, economics, and welfare_. New York: Harper and Brothers.
Google Scholar - DELURY, GEORGE E. ed. 1983_World encyclopedia of political systems and parties_. Harlow, Essex, UK: Longman.
Google Scholar - DEPARTMENT OF STATE See United States Government
- DUNN-RANKIN PETER 1983_Scaling methods_. Hillsdale, N.J.: L. Erlbaum.
Google Scholar - EUROPA 1986_The Europa yearbook_. London: Europa Publications.
Google Scholar - 0 1986a_South America, Central America and the Caribbean_. London: Europa Publications.
Google Scholar - 0 1986b_The Far East and Australasia_. London: Europa Publications.
Google Scholar - 0 1986c_Africa south of the Sahara_. London: Europa Publications.
Google Scholar - 0 1986d_The Middle East and North Africa: A survey and directory of the countries of the Middle East_. London: Europa Publications.
Google Scholar - FUKUI, HARUHIRO, ed. 1985_Political parties of Asia and the Pacific_. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press
Google Scholar - GASTIL, RAYMOND L 1986_Freedom in the world: Political rights and civil liberties, 1985–1986_. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Google Scholar - GORDEN, RAYMOND L. 1977_Unidimensional scaling of social variables: Concepts and procedures_. New York: Free Press.
Google Scholar - HUMANA, CHARLES 1986_World human rights guide_. New York: Facts on File.
Google Scholar - McHALE, VINCENT E., ed. 1983_Political parties of Europe_. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Google Scholar - McIVER, JOHN P. and EDWARD G. CARMINES 1981_Unidimensional scaling_. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
Google Scholar - NUNNALLY, JUM C. 1967_Psychometric theory_. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Google Scholar - PHILLIPS, CLAUDE S. 1984_The African political dictionary_. Santa Barbara, Calif.: ABC-Clio.
Google Scholar - The statesman's year-book 1986_Statistical and historical annual of the states of the world_. London and New York: Macmillan, St. Martin's Press.
- United States Government, Department of State 1986_Country reports on human rights practices for 1985_. Washington: United States Government Printing Office.
Google Scholar - Watch Committees, The Lawyers Committee for Human Rights 1986_Critique: Review of the Department of State's country reports on human rights_. New York: Fund for Free Expression for the Watch Committees and the Watch Committees and the Lawyers Committee for Human Rights.
Google Scholar
Authors
- Michael Coppedge
- Wolfgang H. Reinicke
Additional information
Michael Coppedge is assistant professor in the Latin American Studies Program at the Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS), 1740 Massachusetts Ave., N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036. He is completing a book on party factions and presidential democracy in Venezuela.
Wolfgang H. Reinicke is a Ph.D. candidate at Yale University and a research fellow at the Brookings Institution, 1775 Massachusetts Ave., N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036. He is currently completing a dissertation on the politics of global integration in banking and finance.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Coppedge, M., Reinicke, W.H. Measuring Polyarchy.St Comp Int Dev 25, 51–72 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02716905
- Issue date: March 1990
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02716905