An experimental check on quantitative genetical theory II. The long-term effects of selection (original) (raw)

Summary

1. 1. The results of continued selection for abdominal bristles in a large population of_Drosophila melanogaster_ are presented and discussed.
2. 1. Response had slowed down considerably in many lines after twenty generations, although in some it continued until the 30th generation. In many of the lines, the cessation of response was abrupt and lack of response did not mean exhaustion of genetic variability.
3. 1. In three of the high lines, the high variability was apparently due to continued selection of heterozygotes for a lethal gene. In two high lines, such genes were present on both 2nd and 3rd chromosomes.
4. 1. In the low lines, a striking phenomenon was a sudden increase of variation in females followed by a rapid response in that sex. This appeared in all lines with different times of onset. The ratio of male to female score in all low lines was greater than unity, compared to 0.8 in the initial population.
5. 1. Genetic variation was maintained in many of the low lines after response had ceased. The situation appeared to be complex in that lethal genes, infertility of extreme females, and heterozygosity for inversions all played some part.
6. 1. In such situations, the classical heritability approach appeared to break down completely. In some cases, the reason for the breakdown could be given in terms of the other phenomena observed, but in some of the low lines the full explanation was not clear.
7. 1. The relevance of these results to practical problems of animal breeding is discussed.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

• Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
• Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
• Cancel anytime View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

• Clayton, G. A., Morris, J. A. &Robertson, A. (1956). An experimental check on quantitative genetical theory. I. The short-term response to selection.J. Genet.55, 131–51.
  Google Scholar
• Falconer, D. S. (1953). Asymmetrical response in selection experiments.I.U.B.S. Symposium on Genetics of Population Structure, pp. 16–41.
• Lerner, I. M. &Dempster, E. R. (1951). Attenuation of genetic progress under continued selection in poultry.Heredity,5, 75–94.
  Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Rasmuson, M. (1955). Selection for bristle numbers in some unrelated strains of_Drosophila melanogaster_.Acta Zool., Stockh.,36, 1–49.
  Article Google Scholar
• Reeve, E. C. R. &Robertson, F. W. (1953). Studies in quantitative inheritance. II. Analysis of a strain of_Drosophila melanogaster_ selected for long wings.J. Genet.51, 276–316.
  Google Scholar
• Robertson, F. W. &Reeve, E. C. R. (1952). Studies in quantitative inheritance. I. The effects of selection on wing and thorax length in_Drosophila melanogaster_.J. Genet.50, 414–48.
  Article Google Scholar
• Stern, C. (1948). Negative heterosis and decreased effectiveness of alleles in heterozygotes.Genetics,33, 215–19.
  Google Scholar
• Sturtevant, A. H. &Beadle, G. W. (1936). The relations of inversions in the X-chromosome of_Drosophila melangoaster_ to crossing-over and disjunction.Genetics,21, 554–604.
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Wright, S. (1952). The genetics of quantitative variability.Quantitative Inheritance, pp. 5–41. London: H.M.S.O.
  Google Scholar

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

1. Institute of Animal Genetics, Edinburgh
   G. A. Clayton & Alan Robertson

Authors

1. G. A. Clayton
2. Alan Robertson

Additional information

Member of the Scientific Staff, Agricultural Research Council, Great Britain.

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Clayton, G.A., Robertson, A. An experimental check on quantitative genetical theory II. The long-term effects of selection.J Genet 55, 152–170 (1957). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02981621

Download citation

• Received: 29 March 1956
• Issue date: February 1957
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02981621

Keywords