Calling rhythm as a predictor of the outcome of vocal interactions: flight departure in pale-winged starling pairs (original) (raw)

Abstract

Vocal communication plays an important role in the regulation of social interactions and the coordination of activities in many animal species. Synchrony is an essential part of the establishment and maintenance of pair bonds, but few reports have investigated decision-making at the pair level. We investigated temporal characteristics of call exchanges in pale-winged starlings (Onychognathus nabouroup) that could predict whether one, two, or neither members of a pair would take off. Our analysis of these interactions revealed that the overall rhythm of a call exchange, as well as the acceleration towards the end of an interaction, were significantly associated with the type of behavioural outcome. Faster rhythms were associated with higher probabilities that both birds would fly away. Our results confirm the findings of previous studies showing that higher rates of alarm calls indicate imminent departure and highlight the relationship between temporal features of vocal interactions and their outcome.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or eBook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data are available in the supplementary electronic material at: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.7448795.v1.

References

• Bigot E, Hausberger M, Black JM (1995) Exuberant youth: the example of triumph ceremonies in barnacle geese (Branta leucopsis). Ethol Ecol Evol 7:79–85. 37
  Google Scholar
• Black JM (1988) Preflight signalling in swans: a mechanism for group cohesion and flock formation. Ethology 79:143–157
  Google Scholar
• Blumstein DT, Armitage KB (1997) Alarm calling in yellow-bellied marmots: I. The meaning of situationally variable alarm calls. Anim Behav 53:143–171
  Google Scholar
• Boinsky S (1993) Vocal coordination of troop movement among white-faced capuchin monkeys, Cebus capucinus. Am J Primatol 30:85–100
  Google Scholar
• Bousquet CAH, Sumpter DJT, Manser MB (2011) Moving calls: a vocal mechanism underlying quorum decisions in cohesive groups. Proc R Soc B 278:1482–1488
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Carter GG, Skowronski MD, Faure PA, Fenton B (2008) Antiphonal calling allows individual discrimination in white-winged vampire bats. Anim Behav 76:1343–1355
  Google Scholar
• Craig AJFK, Feare CJ (2009) Familiy Sturnidae (starlings). In: Del Hoyo J, Elliott A, Christie D (eds) Handbook of the birds of the world, vol 14. Barcelona, Lynx Editions, pp 654–758
  Google Scholar
• Dahlin CR, Benedict L (2014) Angry birds need not apply: a perspective on the flexible form and multifunctionality of avian vocal duets. Ethology 120:1–10
  Google Scholar
• Feare C, Craig AJFK (1998) Starlings and mynas. A & C Black, London
  Google Scholar
• Hausberger M, Black JM (1990) Do females turn males on and off in barnacle goose social display? Ethology 84:232–238
  Google Scholar
• Henry L, Craig AJFK, Lemasson A, Hausberger M (2015a) Social coordination in animal vocal interactions. Is there any evidence of turn-taking? The starling as an animal model. Front Psychol 6:325–328
  Google Scholar
• Henry L, Biquand V, Craig AJFK, Hausberger M (2015b) Sexing adult pale-winged starlings using morphometric and discriminant function analysis. PLoS ONE 10(9):e0135628
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Hohmann G (1989) Vocal communication of wild bonnet macaques (Macaca radiata). Primates 30:325–345
  Google Scholar
• Hulley PE, Craig AJFK, Walter GH (2002) Group displays in pale-winged starlings. Afr Zool 37:105–107
  Google Scholar
• Janik VM (2000) Whistle matching in wild bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus). Science 289:1355–1357
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Johnsgard PA (1962) Evolutionary trends in the behavior and morphology of the Anatidae. Wildfowl 13(340):130–148
  Google Scholar
• King AJ, Cowlishaw G (2009) Leaders, followers, and group decision-making. Commun Integrat Biol 2:147–150
  Google Scholar
• King AJ, Sueur C (2011) Where next? Group coordination and collective decision making by primates. Int J Primatol 3:1245–1267
  Google Scholar
• Lemasson A, Glas L, Barbu S, Lacroix A, Guilloux M, Remeuf K, Koda H (2011) Youngsters do not pay attention to conversational rules: also in nonhuman primates? Sci Rep 1:22
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Lemasson A, Ouattara K, Bouchet H, Zuberbühler K (2010) Speed of call delivery is related to context and caller identity in Campbell’s monkey males. Naturwissenschaften 97:1023–1027
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• McComb K, Moss C, Sayialel S, Baker L (2000) Unusually extensive networks of vocal recognition in African elephants. Anim Behav 59:1103–1109
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Naguib M (1990) Effects of song overlapping and alternating in nocturnally singing nightingales. Anim Behav 88:1061–1067
  Google Scholar
• Oller K, Griebel U (2008) Evolution of communicative flexibility: complexity, creativity, and adaptability in human and animal communication. MIT Press, Cambridge
  Google Scholar
• Ouattara K, Zuberbühler K, N’goran EK, Gombert JE, Lemasson A (2009) The alarm call system of female Campbell’s monkeys. Anim Behav 78:35–44
  Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team, R: a language and environment for statistical computing, 2009 Vienna Austria) R Foundation for Statistical Computing ISBN 3-900051-07-0 Available from: http://www.R-project.org/
• Radford AN (2004) Vocal coordination of group movement by green wood hoopoes (Phoeniculus purpureus). Ethology 110:11–20
  Google Scholar
• Ramseyer A, Petit O, Thierry B (2009) Decision-making in group departures of female domestic geese. Behaviour 146:351–371
  Google Scholar
• Richard JP (1991) Sound analysis and synthesis using an Amiga microcomputer. Bioacoustics 3:45–60
  Google Scholar
• Seeley T, Tautz J (2001) Worker piping in honey bee swarms and its role in preparing for liftoff. J Comp Physiol 187:667–676
  CAS Google Scholar
• Seyfarth RM, Cheney DL (2003) Meaning and emotion in animal vocalizations. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1000:32–55
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Siegel S (1956) Nonparametric statistics for the behavioural sciences. McGraw-Hill, Kogakusha, Ltd.
  Google Scholar
• Soltis J, Leong K, Savage A (2005) African elephant vocal communication I: antiphonal calling behaviour among affiliated females. Anim Behav 70:579–587
  Google Scholar
• Stewart KJ, Harcourt AH (1994) Gorillas' vocalizations during rest periods: signals of impending departure? Behaviour 130(1):29–40
  Google Scholar
• Sueur J, Petit O (2008) Shared or unshared consensus decision in macaques? Behav Process 78:84–92
  CAS Google Scholar
• Sueur C, Petit O (2010) Signals use by leaders in Macaca tonkeana and Macaca mulatta: group-mate recruitment and behaviour monitoring. Anim Cogn 13:239–248
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Tacha TC (1984) Preflight behavior of sandhill cranes. Wilson Bull 96:471–477
  Google Scholar
• Tinbergen N (1953) Social behaviour in animals. Chapman and Hall, London
  Google Scholar
• Walker RH, King AJ, McNutt JW, Jordan NR (2017) Sneeze to leave: African wild dogs (Lycaon pictus) use variable quorum thresholds facilitated by sneezes in collective decisions. Proc R Soc B 284:20170347
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Warkentin KJ, Keeley AT, Hare JF (2001) Repetitive calls of juvenile Richardson’s ground squirrels (Spermophilus richardsonii) communicate response urgency. Can J Zool 79:569–573
  Google Scholar
• Weary DM, Kramer DL (1995) Response of eastern chipmunks to conspecific alarm calls. Anim Behav 49:81–93
  Google Scholar
• Yosida S, Kobayasi KI, Ikebuchi M, Ozaki R, Okanoya K (2007) Antiphonal vocalization of a subterranean rodent, the naked mole-rat (Heterocephalus glaber). Ethology 113:703–710
  Google Scholar
• Zuberbühler K (2002) A syntactic rule in forest monkey communication. Anim Behav 63:293–299
  Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

Patrick and Mary Hulley, Michael Ford and Arjen Van Zwieten helped catch and ring birds; Tshifhiwa Mandiwana-Neudani assisted in organising fieldwork. We are particularly grateful to SANParks for permitting this research and SANParks staff, especially Sharon Thompson as scientific coordinator, Frans van Rooyen and Leane van Vyk, in Augrabies Falls National Park, for their assistance in many ways.

The authors thank Véronique Biquand for her help with statistics and Ann Cloarec for correcting the English.

Funding

This research is part of an International Associated Laboratory project (Vocom) jointly funded by CNRS (France), NRF (South Africa) and Rennes 1 University (France).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

1. CNRS, Laboratoire d’Ethologie animale et humaine, Université de Rennes, Université de Caen-Normandie, UMR 6552, Caen, France
   Martine Hausberger
2. CNRS, Laboratoire d’Ethologie animale et humaine, Université de Rennes, Université de Caen-Normandie, UMR, 6552, Caen, France
   Aline Giacalone, Mariane Harmand & Laurence Henry
3. Department of Zoology and Entomology, Rhodes University, Grahamstown, South Africa
   Adrian J.F.K. Craig

Authors

1. Martine Hausberger
   You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
2. Aline Giacalone
   You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
3. Mariane Harmand
   You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
4. Adrian J.F.K. Craig
   You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
5. Laurence Henry
   You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MH2, LH, MH1 and AC designed the procedure; MH1 performed the field recordings; MH1, LH, MH2 and AG analysed the data; AG, LH, MH2 and AC wrote the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence toLaurence Henry.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving animals were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution or practice at which the studies were conducted. Ethics approval for capture and ringing of birds were granted to Adrian Craig (Rhodes University Ethical Standards Committee, RU-LAD-15-09-0001). Research in the national park and handling of the birds by qualified bird-ringers were approved by the ethical committee of South African National Parks (#HAUM1381).

Additional information

Communicated by: Paula Roig Boixeda

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hausberger, M., Giacalone, A., Harmand, M. et al. Calling rhythm as a predictor of the outcome of vocal interactions: flight departure in pale-winged starling pairs.Sci Nat 107, 2 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-019-1658-1

Download citation

• Received: 18 July 2019
• Revised: 05 November 2019
• Accepted: 07 November 2019
• Published: 03 December 2019
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-019-1658-1

Keywords