It’s All in the Numbers: Acreage Tallies and Environmental Program Evaluation (original) (raw)
Allen A. O., J. J. Feddema. 1996. Wetland loss and substitution by the section 404 permit program in Southern California, USA. Envir Manage 20:263–274 Article Google Scholar
Association of State Wetland Managers. 2006. State Wetland Programs. Available at http://www.aswm.org/swp/index.htm, accessed March 31, 2006
Babcock H. 1991. Federal wetlands regulatory policy: up to its ears in alligators. Pace Envir Law Rev 8:307 Google Scholar
Beck R. E. 1994. The movement in the United States to restoration and creation of wetlands. Natural Resources J 34:781–822 Google Scholar
Behn R. 2003. Why measure performance? Different purposes require different measures. Public Admin Rev 63:586–606 Article Google Scholar
Bennear L., C. Coglianese. 2004. Evaluating environmental policies. KSG working paper no. RWP04-049. Available at SSRN: http://www.ssrn.com/abstract=619901
Blumm M. C., B. D. Zaleha. 1989. Federal wetlands protection under the Clean Water Act: regulatory ambivalence, intergovernmental tension, and a call for reform. University of Colorado Law Review 60:695–772 Google Scholar
Brown P. H., C. L. Lant. 1999. The effect of wetland mitigation banking on the achievement of no-net-loss. Envir Manage 23:333–345 Article Google Scholar
Busenberg G. J. 2004a. Adaptive policy design for the management of wildfire hazards. Am Behav Scientist 48:314–326 Article Google Scholar
Busenberg G. J. 2004b. Wildfire management in the United States: the evolution of a policy failure. Rev Policy Res 212:145–156 Article Google Scholar
Carey H., M. Schumann. 2003. Modifying wildfire behavior—the effectiveness of fuel treatments: the status of our knowledge. National Community Forestry Center. Southwest Region Working Paper #2: Santa Fe, New Mexico
Clark A. L., G. H. Dalrymple. 2003. $7.8 Billion for Everglades restoration: why do environmentalists look so worried? Population Envir 24:541–569 Article Google Scholar
Cole C. A., D. Shafer. 2002. Section 404 wetland mitigation and permit success criteria in Pennsylvania, USA, 1986–1999. Envir Manage 30:508–515 Article Google Scholar
Constanza R., R. d’Arge, R. de Groot, S. Farber, M. Grasso, B. Hannon, K. Limburg, S. Nameem, R. V. O’Neill, J. Paruelo, R. G. Raskin, P. Sutton, M. van der Belt. 1997. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253–260 Article Google Scholar
Council on Environmental Quality, Executive Office of the President. 2005. Conserving America’s wetlands, implementing the President’s goal. Coastal America, April, Washington, DC
Dahl T. E. 2006. Status and trends of wetlands in the conterminous United States, 1998–2004. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC Google Scholar
Dahl T. E. 2000. Status and trends of wetlands in the conterminous United States, 1986–1997. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC Google Scholar
Dale L. 2005. Following the money: National fire plan funding and implementation. Policy analysis. The Wilderness Society: Washington, DC Google Scholar
Dawson B. 2005. Opening keynote: A national perspective on ecosystem restoration. Water and the environment: The role of ecosystem restoration, University of Arizona, Water Resources Research Center, Tucson, Arizona, April 6, 2005
Donovan G. H., T. C. Brown. 2005. Incentives for wildfire management on National Forest land. Forest Science 51(5):387–397 Google Scholar
Easton D. 1965. A framework for political analysis. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ Google Scholar
Edelman M. 1985. The symbolic uses of politics. University of Illinois Press, Champaign, Illinois Google Scholar
Engel-Cox J. A., R. M. Hoff. 2005. Science-policy data compact: use of environmental monitoring data for air quality policy. Envir Sci Policy 8:115–131 ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Esty D. C. 2001. Toward data-driven environmentalism: The environmental sustainability index. Envir Law Inst 13: 10603–10612 Google Scholar
Failing L., R. Gregory. 2003. Ten common mistakes in designing biodiversity indicators for forest policy. J Envir Manage 68:121–132 Google Scholar
Franklin J. F., J. K. Agee. 2003. Forging a science-based national forest fire policy. Issues Sci Technol Fall
Gerlak A. K. 1996. United States wetlands policy: Is this policy all wet? In Soden DL (ed) At the nexus: Science policy. Nova Science Publishers, Commack, New York, pp 29–45 Google Scholar
Gorte R. 2000. Forest Service performance measures. Testimony before the House Resources Committee Subcommittee on Forests and Forest Health: June 29, 2000
Government Accounting Standards Board (GASB). 2005. Performance management for government. Available at: http://www.seagov.org/index.shtml (accessed October 11, 2005)
Grunwald M. 2002a. Interior’s silence on Corps plan questioned. Washington Post, January 14, 2002, A05
Grunwald M. 2002b. White House relaxes rules on protection of wetlands. Washington Post, January 15, 2002, A02
Healthy Forests Restoration Act. 2003. (Public Law 108-148)
Heimlich R. E., K. D. Wiebe, R. Claussen, D. Gadsby, R. M. House. 1998. Wetlands and agriculture: Private interests and public benefits. USDA, Economic Research Service, September, Washington, DC
Hornyak M. M., K. E. Halvorsen. 2003. Wetland mitigation compliance in the Western Upper Peninsula of Michigan. Envir Manage 32:535–540 Article Google Scholar
Hunt R. J. 1996. Do created wetlands replace the wetlands that are destroyed. U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, Madison, Wisconsin
Jehl D. 2003. On environmental rules, Bush sees a balance, critics a threat. New York Times, February 23, 2003
Kaiser J. 2001. Recreated wetlands no match for original. Science 6 (July 2001), 233
Kalen S. 1994. Commerce to conservation: The call for a national water policy and the evolution of federal jurisdiction over wetlands. North Dakota Law Rev 69:873–914 Google Scholar
Keeley J. 2002. Fire management of California shrubland landscapes. Envir Manage 29:395–408 Article Google Scholar
Kentula M. E,. 1996. Wetland restoration and creation. In J. D. Fretwell, J. S. Williams, P. J. Redman (compilers) The national water summary on wetland resources. Water-supply paper 2425. U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, DC, pp 87–92
Kettl D. F. 2002. The transformation of governance: Public administration in twenty-first century America. The Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, Maryland Google Scholar
Kravchuk R. S., R. W. Schack. 1996. Designing effective performance-measurement and systems under the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993. Public Admin Rev 56:348–358 Article Google Scholar
Long E., F. Aimee. 2004. The paradox of implementing the Government Performance and Results Act: Top-down direction for bottom-up implementation. Public Admin Rev 64:309–319 Article Google Scholar
Lundmark C. 2001. Keeping track of wetland restoration. Bioscience 52:696 Article Google Scholar
Lynch D. L., K. Mackes. 2003. Costs for reducing fuels in Colorado forest restoration projects. USDA Forest Service Proceedings RMRS-P-29:167–175
McCarthy L. 2004. State of the National Fire Plan. Forest Trust, Santa Fe, New Mexico
Mitsch W. J., W. Xinyuan, R. W. Nairn, P. E. Weihe, N. Wang, R. Deal, C. E. Boucher. 1998. Creating and restoring wetlands: A whole-ecosystem experiment in self-design. Bioscience 48:1019–1030 Article Google Scholar
Mortimer M. J. 1998. Irregular regulation under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act: Is the Congress of the Army Corps of Engineers to blame? J Envir Law Litigation 13:445–474 Google Scholar
National Academy of Public Administration. 2001. Managing wildland fire: Enhancing capacity to implement the federal interagency policy. NAPA, Washington, DC
National Academy of Public Administration. 1999. Restoring managerial accountability to the United States Forest Service. NAPA, Washington, DC
National Research Council. 2001. Compensating for Wetland losses under the Clean Water Act. National Academy Press, Washington, DC Google Scholar
National Wetlands Newsletter. 2001. The SWANCC decision. Environmental Law Institute (January–February), Washington, DC, p 2
Niemeijer D. 2002. Developing indicators for environmental policy: Data-driven and theory-driven approaches examined by example. Envir Sci Policy 5:91–103 Article Google Scholar
Office of Management and Budget (OMB). 2004. FY04 budget fall review, OMB PART Review, Washington, DC
O’Hagan K. 1991. Pumping with the intent to kill: Evading wetlands jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act through draining. DePaul Law Rev 40:1059–1106 Google Scholar
O’Malley R. 2003. Providing “better” data: Not as simple as it might seem. Environment 45:8–18 Google Scholar
Omi P., E. Martinson. 2002. Final report: Effect of fuels treatment on wildfire severity. Submitted to the Joint Fire Science Program Governing Board. Western Forest Fire Research Center, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado
Pianin E. 2003a. Administration establishes new wetlands guidelines; 20 million acres could lose protected status, groups say. Washington Post, January 11, 2003, A05
Pianin E. 2003b. EPA scraps changes to Clean Water Act. Washington Post, December 17, 2003
Pyne S. J. 1997. America’s fires: Management on wildlands and forests. Forest History Society, Durham, North Carolina Google Scholar
Sanger D. E., D. M. Halbfinger. 2004. For Earth Day, Bush and Kerry vie on environment. New York Times, April 23, 2004
Schuster E. G., D. A. Cleaves, E. F. Bell. 1997. Analysis of USDA Forest Service fire-related expenditures 1970–1995. Res. Paper PSW-RP-230. Pacific Southwest Research Station, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Albany, California
Stephens S. L., J. J. Moghaddas. 2005. Silvicultural and reserve impacts on potential fire behavior and forest conservation: Twenty-five years of experience from Sierra Nevada mixed conifer forests. Biol Conserv 125:369–379 Article Google Scholar
Sudol M. F., R. F. Ambrose. 2002. The US Clean Water Act and habitat replacement: Evaluation of mitigation sites in Orange County, California, USA. Envir Manage 30:727–734 Article Google Scholar
U.S. Advisory Committee on Intergovernmental Relations. 1992. Intergovernmental decisionmaking for environmental protection and public works. U.S. Advisory Committee on Intergovernmental Relations, Washington, DC
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2002. Regulatory guidance letter/national wetlands mitigation action plan. U.S. Department of Defense, Army Corps of Engineers (24 December 2002), Washington, DC
U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2000. Summary report: 1997 national resources inventory. Natural Resources Conservation Service, Iowa State University Statistical Laboratory
U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2004a. FY05 budget justification. Forest Service, Washington, DC
U.S. Department of Agriculture Council on Environmental Quality, Department of the Interior (USDOI). 2004b. Bush administration officials: Federal land managers set record-level accomplishments of President’s healthy forests initiative. Press Release #0435.04, Washington, DC
U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2004c. Science basis for changing forest structure to modify wildfire behavior and severity. April: Washington, DC
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 2006b. News release #FS-0615. President’s FY 2007 budget advances goals of healthy forests initiative and meets targets of the Northwest Forest Plan. Washington, DC
U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2002. National wetlands inventory: A strategy for the 21st century. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC
U.S. Government Accountability Office. 2005. Environmental indicators: Better coordination is needed to develop environmental indicator sets that inform decisions. GAO-05-52. Washington, DC
U.S. Government Accountability Office. 2004a. OMB’s program assessment rating tool presents opportunities and challenges for evaluating program performance. GAO-04-550T. Washington, DC
U.S. Government Accountability Office. 2004c. Waters and wetlands: Corps of engineers needs to evaluate its district office practices in determining jurisdiction. Government Accountability Office. GAO-04-297, Washington, DC
U.S. Government Accountability Office. 2003a. Forest Service: Little progress on performance accountability likely unless management addresses key challenges. GAO-03-503. Washington, DC
U.S. Government Accountability Office. 2003b. Department of Agriculture: Status of efforts to address major financial management challenges. Statement of McCoy Williams, testimony before the Subcommittee on Government Efficiency and Financial Management, Committee on Government Reform, House of Representatives. GAO-03-871T. Washington, DC
U.S. Government Accountability Office. 2003c. Wildland fire management: Additional actions required to better identify and prioritize lands needing fuels reduction. GAO-03-805. Washington, DC
U.S. General Accounting Office. 2002. Results-oriented management: Agency crosscutting actions and plans in border control, flood mitigation and insurance, wetlands, and wildland fire management. GAO-03-321. Washington, DC
U.S. General Accounting Office. 2001. Assessments needed to determine the effectiveness of in-lieu mitigation. General Accounting Office. GAO-01-325, Washington, DC
U.S. General Accounting Office. 1998. Wetlands overview: Problems with acreage data persist. General Accounting Office. GAO/RCED-98-150. Washington, DC
U.S. House of Representatives. 2001. Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, Subcommittee on Water Resources and Development. The wetlands permitting process: Is it working fairly? (H. Rept. 107-50). October
Vileisis A. 1997. Discovering the unknown landscape: A history of America’s wetlands. Island Press, Washington, DC Google Scholar
Western Governors’ Association. 2002. A collaborative approach for reducing wildland fire risks to communities and the environment: 10-year comprehensive strategy implementation plan. Washington, DC
Western Governors’ Association. 2001. A collaborative approach for reducing wildland fire risks to communities and the environment: 10-year comprehensive strategy. Washington, DC
Wilen B. O. 1995. The folly of the numbers game. National Wetlands Newslett May–June:8–10
Wise C., A. J. Yoder. 2004. Policy and institutional arrangements in federal wildland fire mitigation. Presented at the International Social Science and Resource Management Conference, Keystone, Colorado
Zedler J. B. 2003. Wetlands at your service: Reducing impacts of agriculture at the watershed scale. Front Ecol Environ 1:65–72 Article Google Scholar
Zinn J. A., C. Copeland. 2004. Wetlands issues in national wetlands: Issues and developments, ST Prescott (ed) New York: Nova Science Publishers, pp 1–21