PASSCLAIM1—Gut health and immunity (original) (raw)

Summary.

Background:

The gut and immune system form a complex integrated structure that has evolved to provide effective digestion and defence against ingested toxins and pathogenic bacteria. However, great variation exists in what is considered normal healthy gut and immune function. Thus, whilst it is possible to measure many aspects of digestion and immunity, it is more difficult to interpret the benefits to individuals of variation within what is considered to be a normal range. Nevertheless, it is important to set standards for optimal function for use both by the consumer, industry and those concerned with the public health. The digestive tract is most frequently the object of functional and health claims and a large market already exists for gut-functional foods worldwide.

Aim:

To define normal function of the gut and immune system and describe available methods of measuring it.

Results:

We have defined normal bowel habit and transit time, identified their role as risk factors for disease and how they may be measured. Similarly, we have tried to define what is a healthy gut flora in terms of the dominant genera and their metabolism and listed the many, varied and novel methods for determining these parameters.

It has proved less easy to provide boundaries for what constitutes optimal or improved gastric emptying, gut motility, nutrient and water absorption and the function of organs such as the liver, gallbladder and pancreas. The many tests of these functions are described.

We have discussed gastrointestinal well being. Sensations arising from the gut can be both pleasant and unpleasant. However, the characteristics of well being are ill defined and merge imperceptibly from acceptable to unacceptable, a state that is subjective. Nevertheless, we feel this is an important area for future work and method development.

The immune system is even more difficult to make quantitative judgements about. When it is defective, then clinical problems ensure, but this is an uncommon state. The innate and adaptive immune systems work synergistically together and comprise many cellular and humoral factors. The adaptive system is extremely sophisticated and between the two arms of immunity there is great redundancy, which provides robust defences. New aspects of immune function are discovered regularly. It is not clear whether immune function can be „improved“.

Measuring aspects of immune function is possible but there is no one test that will define either the status or functional capacity of the immune system. Human studies are often limited by the ability to sample only blood or secretions such as saliva but it should be remembered that only 2% of lymphocytes circulate at any given time, which limits interpretation of data.

We recommend assessing the functional capacity of the immune system by:

measuring specific cell functions ex vivo

measuring in vivo responses to challenge, e. g. change in antibody in blood or response to antigens

determining the incidence and severity of infection in target populations during naturally occurring episodes or in response to attenuated pathogens.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Pathology and Neuroscience, University of Dundee Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK
    John H. Cummings
  2. Danone Vitapole, Route Départementale 128, 91767, Palaiseau, Cedex, France
    Jean-Michel Antoine
  3. Hospital General Vall d’Hebron, Digestive System Research Unit, Passeig Vall d’Hebron 119–129, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
    Fernando Azpiroz
  4. Danone Vitapole, Route Départementale 128, 91767, Palaiseau, Cedex, France
    Raphaelle Bourdet-Sicard
  5. University of Oslo LIIPAT—Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Rikshospitalet, 0027, Oslo, Norway
    Per Brandtzaeg
  6. University of Southampton, Institute of Human Nutrition, School of Medicine, Bassett Crescent East, Southampton, SO16 7PX, UK
    Philip C. Calder
  7. University of Reading Microbiology Laboratory, Earley Gate, Whiteknights House Reading, RG6 6AH
    Glenn R. Gibson
  8. Hospital General Vall d’Hebron, Digestive System Research Unit, Passeig Vall d’Hebron 119–129, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
    Francisco Guarner
  9. University of Turku, Department of Paediatrics, 607, 20520, Turku, Finland
    Erika Isolauri
  10. Former ILSI Europe, Avenue E. Mounier 83, 6, 1200, Brussels, Belgium
    Daphne Pannemans
  11. Yakult UK Ltd, 12–16 Telford Way, Westway Estate, Acton London, W3 7XS, UK
    Colette Shortt
  12. ILSI Europe, Avenue E. Mounier 83, 6, 1200, Brussels, Belgium
    Sandra Tuijtelaars
  13. Federal Research Centre for Nutrition, Institute of Nutritional Physiology, Haid-und-Neu-Strasse 9, 76131, Karlsruhe, Germany
    Bernhard Watzl

Authors

  1. John H. Cummings
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  2. Jean-Michel Antoine
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  3. Fernando Azpiroz
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  4. Raphaelle Bourdet-Sicard
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  5. Per Brandtzaeg
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  6. Philip C. Calder
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  7. Glenn R. Gibson
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  8. Francisco Guarner
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  9. Erika Isolauri
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  10. Daphne Pannemans
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  11. Colette Shortt
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  12. Sandra Tuijtelaars
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  13. Bernhard Watzl
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence toSandra Tuijtelaars.

Additional information

1 Process for the Assessment of Scientific Support for Claims on Foods.

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cummings, J.H., Antoine, JM., Azpiroz, F. et al. PASSCLAIM1—Gut health and immunity.Eur J Nutr 43 (Suppl 2), ii118–ii173 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-004-1205-4

Download citation

Key words