Managing predators, managing reindeer: contested conceptions of predator policies in Finland's southeast reindeer herding area | Polar Record | Cambridge Core (original) (raw)

Abstract

Preserving biodiversity and establishing healthy and thriving populations of predator animals are the expressed aims of many wildlife and ecosystem conservation projects and initiatives. However, such conservation strategies are often in conflict with the traditions, practices and land-use priorities of local communities. This article concentrates on the situation concerning the predation of reindeer (mainly by wolves) in Finland's southeast reindeer herding area and its immediate vicinity, but makes reference to the broader situation of predation and reindeer herding in Finland. Based on analysis of statistics and interviews with local stakeholders, the research findings refer to the intermingled contradictions related to conceptual, statistical and other management relevant knowledge and resulting problems, for example, in conservation hunting licensing. The article concludes that the wolf comprises a complex case for nature conservation initiatives and sustainable reindeer husbandry and that, in practice, it has particular implications compared to other policy approaches to dealing with the problem of animal predators. The article ends with some theoretical considerations as to whether we can improve our understanding of modern human-environment relations by deriving ideas from the actor-network theory debates.

References

Biersack, A., and Greenberg, J.B. (editors). 2006. Reimaging political ecology. Durham NC and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Bisi, J., Kurki, S., Svensberg, M., and Liukkonen, T.. 2007. Human dimensions of wolf (Canis lupus) conflicts in Finland. European Journal of Wildlife Research 53 (4): 304–314.Google Scholar

Bosted, G., and Grahn, P.. 2008. Estimating cost functions for the four large carnivores in Sweden. Ecological Economics 68: 517–523.Google Scholar

Breitenmoser, U. 1998. Large predators in the Alps: the fall and rise of man's competitors. Biological Conservation 83 (3): 279–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buller, H. 2008. Safe from the wolf: biosecurity, biodiversity, and competing philosophies of nature. Environment and Planning A 40: 1583–1597.Google Scholar

Daniels, S., and Walker, G.. 2001. Working through environmental conflict: the collaborative learning approach. Westport CT: Praeger.Google Scholar

Ermala, A. 2003. Survey of large predators in Finland during the 19th–20th centuries. Acta Zoologica Lituanica 13 (1): 15–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finnish nature league [Luonto-Liitto]. 2008. Puskurivyöhyke heikentäisi liikaa susien elinmahdollisuuksia [A buffer zone would weaken too much wolves’ living conditions]. 19 February 2008. URL: http://www.sll.fi/kainuu/susitiedote1 (accessed 20 November 2008).Google Scholar

Freeman, M.M.R., Hudson, R.J., and Foote, L. (editors). 2005. Conservation hunting: people and wildlife in Canada's north. Edmonton: CCI Press.Google Scholar

Glenz, C., Massolo, A., Kuonen, D., and Schlaepfer, R.. 2001. A wolf habitat suitability prediction study in Valais (Switzerland). Landscape and Urban Planning 55(1): 55–65.Google Scholar

Heberlein, T.A., and Ericsson, G.. 2003. Public attitudes and the future of wolves Canis lupus in Sweden. Wildlife Biology 14 (3): 391–394.Google Scholar

Heikkinen, H. 2002. Sopeutumisen mallit–Poronhoidon adaptaatio jälkiteolliseen toimintaympäristöön Suomen läntisellä poronhoitoalueella 1980–2000 [Adaptation models–Adaptation of reindeer herding to the post-industrial working environment in the western reindeer herding area of Finland 1980–2000]. Published PhD. dissertation. Oulu: The University of Oulu (Finnish Literature Society).Google Scholar

Heikkinen, H. I., Lakomäki, S., and Baldridge, J.. 2007. The dimensions of sustainability and the neo-entrepreneurial adaptation strategies in reindeer herding in Finland. The Journal of Ecological Anthropology 11: 25–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hukkinen, J.I. 2008. Sustainability networks: cognitive tools for expert collaboration in social-ecological systems. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Ingold, T. 2000. The perception of the environment: essays in livelihood, dwelling and skill. Routledge. LondonGoogle Scholar

Ingold, T. 2008. When ANT meets SPIDER: social theory for arthropods. In: Knappett, C., and Malafouris, L. (editors). Material agency. New York: Springer Science plus Business Media: 209–215.Google Scholar

Knight, J. (editor). 2000. Natural enemies: people-wildlife conflicts in anthropological perspective. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Knight, J. 2001. Waiting for wolves in Japan: an anthropological study of people-wildlife relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the social. An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

McFarlane, B.L., Craig, R., Stumpf-Allen, G., and Watson, D.O.T.. 2007. Public acceptance of access restrictions to grizzly bear (Ursus arctos) country. Human Dimensions of Wildlife: 12: 283–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moilanen, O. 2007. Tietoa, valtaa ja erämaan petoja. Paikalliskokemuksia Kainuun susikiistasta poliittisen ekologian näkökulmasta tarkasteltuna vuosina 2005–2007 [Knowledge, power and beasts of the wilderness–political ecology concerning the predator disputes in Kainuu in 2005–2007]. Unpublished MA thesis. Oulu: University of Oulu.Google Scholar

Nadasdy, P. 2007. The gift in the animal: the ontology of hunting and human–animal sociality. American Ethnologist 34 (1): 25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Naughton-Treves, L., Grossberg, R., and Treves, A.. 2003. Paying for tolerance: rural citizens’ attitudes toward wolf depredation and compensation. Conservation biology 17 (6): 1500–1511.Google Scholar

Norberg, H., and Nieminen, M.. 2007. Suurpetojen vaikutus poronvasojen kuolleisuuteen Kallioluoman paliskunnassa vuosina 2005–06: [The impact of large carnivores on the mortality of semidomesticated reindeer calves in the reindeer-herding cooperative of Kallioluoma in 2005–06]. Kala- ja Riistaraportteja nro 415.Google Scholar

Pellikka, J. 2005. Management of wildlife richness in Finnish forests–interplay between game-related actors and actions. Published PhD. dissertation. Helsinki: University of Helsinki, Dept. of Applied Biology(publication 25).Google Scholar

Philo, C., and Wilbert, C. (editors). 2000. Animal spaces, beastly places: new geographies of human-animal relations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Rantamäki-Lahtinen, L. (editor). 2008. Porotalouden taloudelliset menestystekijät [Economic success factors of the reindeer husbandry]. MTTn selvityksiä 156. [MTT Agrifood Research 156]. URL: http://www.mtt.fi/mtts/pdf/mtts156.pdf (accessed 20 November 2008).Google Scholar

Ratamäki, O. 2008. Finland's Wolf Policy and New Governance. Journal of Environment and Development 17 (3): 316–339.Google Scholar

Ratamäki, O. 2009. Yhteiskunnallinen kestävyys ja hallinta suomalaisessa susipolitiikassa [Societal sustainability and governance in Finland's wolf policy] (abstract in English). Yhteiskuntatieteellisiä julkaisuja nro 94. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä (Yhteiskuntatieteellisiä julkaisuja nro 94).Google Scholar

Robbins, P. 2004. Political ecology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing (Critical introductions to geography).Google Scholar

Sandström, C., Pellikka, J., Ratamäki, O., and Allan, S.. 2009. Management of large carnivores in Fennoscandia: new patterns of regional participation. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 14 (1): 37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwartz, C.C., Swenson, J.E., and Miller, S.D.. 2003. Large carnivores, moose, and humans: a changing paradigm of predator management in the 21st century. ALCES 39: 41–63.Google Scholar

Sjölander-Lindqvist, A. 2009. Social-natural landscape reorganised: Swedish forest-edge farmers and wolf recovery. Conservation and Society 7 (2): 130–140.Google Scholar

Sippola, A-L., Norberg, H., Renko, M., Suopajärvi, K., and Sutinen T., T. 2005. Petovahinkojen sosioekonominen merkitys porotaloudelle Suomessa– loppuraportti [The socioeconomic impacts of predator caused damages for reindeer herding in Finland, final report]. Arktisen keskuksen tiedotteita [Arctic Centre Reports] 44/2005.Google Scholar

Skogen, K., Mauz, I., and Krange, O.. 2008. Cry wolf!: narratives of wolf recovery in France and Norway. Rural Sociology 73 (1): 105–133.Google Scholar

Thompson, J.G. 1993. Addressing the human dimensions of wolf reintroduction: an example using estimates of livestock depredation and costs of compensation. Society and Natural Resources 6: 165–179.Google Scholar

Wenzel, G.W. 2009. Subsistence and conservation hunting: a Nunavut case study. In: Freeman, M.M.R., and Foote, L. (editors). Inuit, polar bears and sustainable use: local, national, and international perspectives. Edmonton: CCI Press.Google Scholar