The womanly woman: manipulation of stereotypical and nonstereotypical features of Japanese female speech (Chapter 1) - Language, Gender, and Sex in Comparative Perspective (original) (raw)

Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-10T19:07:54.823Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012

Susan U. Philips

Affiliation:

University of Arizona

Susan Steele

Affiliation:

University of Arizona

Christine Tanz

Affiliation:

University of Arizona

Summary

This chapter will address the question of how, or whether, a subset of features identified as characteristic of female speech in a single language – Japanese – covaries across situations. Specifically, speech samples taken from situations in which women typically emphasize their femininity and situations in which they typically do not are compared to determine whether frequencies of occurrence of stereotypical morphological features and of nonstereotypical syntactic features vary in the same ways. That is, a first attempt is made to determine whether all the features identified as elements of Japanese women's speech are, in a straightforward way, part of a Japanese female speech register.

Linguistic investigations into the differences between men's and women's language and speech have been pursued with some intensity during the last decade, and many features of language form or patterns of language use exhibiting sex-related variation have been identified, particularly for English. A full elucidation of sex differences in language, however, requires a more systematically cross-cultural approach than has hitherto characterized the field. The reasons for this are twofold. First, although it has been suggested that differences in men's and women's speech are probably universal, the nature of that claim to universality is unclear and hence fails to be an interesting source of explanation for linguistic fact.

Type

Chapter

Information

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)