Tempo of evolution in a Neogene bryozoan: rates of morphologic change within and across species boundaries | Paleobiology | Cambridge Core (original) (raw)

Abstract

Inadequacies in stratigraphic resolution or completeness can make true rates of morphologic change through geologic time impossible to estimate precisely. However, relative rates may be sufficient to test whether the tempo of change within species can account for morphologic differences across species boundaries, and hence to distinguish between gradual and punctuated patterns of evolution. The conditions under which these patterns can be distinguished statistically are explored by simulating varying degrees of within-species rate variability relative to across-species morphologic difference. The statistical methods are then applied to multiple-character morphologic data from closely spaced sequential populations of the Neogene bryozoan Metrarabdotos, using discriminant analysis to compare overall morphologies. In nine comparisons of ancestor-descendant species pairs, all show within-species rates of morphologic change that do not vary significantly from zero, hence accounting for none of the across-species difference. In all cases the ratio of within-species fluctuation to across-species difference is low enough to allow the punctuated pattern to be distinguished with virtual certainty. In at least seven of the cases, ancestor species persisted after giving rise to descendants, in conformity with the punctuated equilibrium mode of evolution.

References

Charlesworth, B. 1985. Some quantitative methods for studying evolutionary patterns in single characters. Paleobiology. 10:308–318.CrossRef Google Scholar

Cheetham, A. H. 1968. Morphology and systematics of the bryozoan genus Metrarabdotos. Smithsonian Misc. Coll. 153:1–121.Google Scholar

Cheetham, A. H. In press. Patterns of morphologic change in late Tertiary cheilostome bryozoans from the Dominican Republic: Metrarabdotos revisited. [Extended abstract] In: Nielsen, C. and Larwood, G. P., eds. Bryozoa: Ordovician to Recent. Olsen & Olsen; Fredensborg, Denmark.Google Scholar

Cheetham, A. H. and Hayek, L. C. Manuscript. Phylogeny reconstruction in the Neogene bryozoan Metrarabdotos: a paleontologic evaluation of methodology.Google Scholar

Eldredge, N. and Gould, S. J. 1972. Punctuated equilibria: an alternative to phyletic gradualism. Pp. 82–115. In: Schopf, T. J. M., ed. Models in Paleobiology, Freeman, Cooper; San Francisco.CrossRef Google Scholar

Gingerich, P. D. 1983. Rates of evolution: effects of time and temporal scaling. Science. 222:159–161.Google Scholar

Gould, S. J. 1982. The meaning of punctuated equilibrium and its role in validating a hierarchical approach to macroevolution. Pp. 83–104. In: Milkman, R., ed. Perspectives on Evolution. Sinauer; Sunderland, Mass.Google Scholar

Gould, S. J. 1985. The paradox of the first tier: an agenda for paleobiology. Paleobiology. 11:2–12.Google Scholar

Humphries, E. M. 1975. A new approach to resolving the question of speciation in smittinid bryozoans (Bryozoa: Cheilostomata). Pp. 19–35. In: Pouyet, S., ed. Bryozoa 1974. Docums. Lab. Geol. Fac. Sci. Lyon, Hors Ser. 3.Google Scholar

Johnson, A. L. A. 1985. Third International Congress of Systematic and Evolutionary Biology, with a symposium on Random and Directed Events in Evolution, convened by the Palaeontological Association and the Linnean Society. Pp. 5–7. Palaeontol. Assoc. Circ. no. 122.Google Scholar

Kellogg, D. E. 1975. The role of phyletic change in the evolution of Pseudocubus vema (Radiolaria). Paleobiology. 1:359–370.Google Scholar

Kellogg, D. E. and Hays, J. D. 1975. Microevolutionary patterns in late Cenozoic Radiolaria. Paleobiology. 1:150–160.Google Scholar

Klecka, W. R. 1975. Discriminant analysis. Pp. 434–467. In: Nie, N. H., Hull, C. H., Jenkins, J. G., Steinbrenner, K., and Dent, D. H., eds. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. 2d ed.McGraw-Hill; New York.Google Scholar

Malmgren, B. A. and Kennett, J. P. 1981. Phyletic gradualism in a Late Cenozoic lineage; DSDP Site 284, Southwest Pacific. Paleobiology. 7:230–240.Google Scholar

Malmgren, B. A., Berggren, W. A., and Lohmann, G. P. 1984. Evidence for punctuated gradualism in the Late Neogene Globorotalia tumida lineage of planktonic foraminifera. Paleobiology. 9:377–389.CrossRef Google Scholar

Maturo, F. J. S. 1973. Offspring variation from known maternal stocks of Parasmittina nitida (Verrill). Pp. 477–584. In: Larwood, G. P., ed. Living and Fossil Bryozoa. Academic Press; London.Google Scholar

Sadler, P. M. 1981. Sediment accumulation rates and the completeness of stratigraphic sections. J. Geol. 89:569–584.CrossRef Google Scholar

Saunders, J. B., Jung, P., and Biju-Duval, B. 1986. Neogene paleontology in the northern Dominican Republic. 1. Field surveys, lithology, and age. Bull. Am. Paleontol. 89(323).Google Scholar

Schopf, T. J. M. 1984. Rates of evolution and the notion of “living fossils.” Ann. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 12:245–292.Google Scholar

Schopf, T. J. M., Raup, D. M., Gould, S. J., and Simberloff, D. S. 1975. Genomic versus morphologic rates of evolution: influence of morphologic complexity. Paleobiology. 1:63–70.Google Scholar

Simpson, G. G. 1953. The Major Features of Evolution. Columbia Univ. Press; New York and London.Google Scholar

Stanley, S. M. 1979. Macroevolution: Pattern and Process. W. H. Freeman; San Francisco.Google Scholar

Stanley, S. M. 1985. Rates of evolution. Paleobiology. 11:13–26.Google Scholar

Winston, J. E. 1981. Feeding behavior of modern bryozoans. Pp. 1–21. In: Broadhead, T. W., ed. Lophophorates, Notes for a Short Course. Stud. Geol. 5. Univ. Tennessee, Dept. Geol. Sci.Google Scholar