The nature of sociolinguistic perception | Language Variation and Change | Cambridge Core (original) (raw)

Abstract

This study investigates how linguistic variation carries social meaning, examining the impact of the English variable (ING) on perceptions of eight speakers from the U.S. West Coast and South. Thirty-two excerpts of spontaneous speech were digitally manipulated to vary only in tokens of (ING) and used to collect listener perceptions in group interviews (N = 55) and an experiment (N = 124). Interview data and experimental results show that (ING) impacts social perception variably, inhabiting an indexical field of related meanings (Eckert, Penelope. [2008]. Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(4):453–476). One of these meanings, intelligence/education, is explored in detail to understand how a given meaning is realized or not in a specific context. Speakers were heard as less educated/intelligent when they used -in, but this effect is driven by reactions to speakers heard as aregional and not as working-class. Some implications on our future understanding of the processing of socially laden variation are discussed.

References

Baayen, Harald. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bradac, James J., Cargile, Aaron Castelan, & Hallett, Jennifer S. (2001). Language attitudes: Retrospect, conspect and prospect. In Robinson, W. P. & Giles, H. (eds.), The new handbook of language and social psychology. New York: John Wiley & Sons. 137–155.Google Scholar

Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn. (2005). Listener perceptions of sociolinguistic variables: The case of (ING). Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University.Google Scholar

Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn. (2007). Accent, (ING), and the social logic of listener perceptions. American Speech 82(1):32–64.CrossRef Google Scholar

Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn. (2008). I'll be the judge of that: Diversity in social perceptions of (ING). Language in Society 37(5):637–659.CrossRef Penn Working Papers in Linguistics: Selected papers from NWAV 34. Vol. 12.2. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Penn Linguistics Club. 105–129.Google Scholar

Lippi-Green, Rosina. (1997). English with an accent: Language, ideology, and discrimination in the United States. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Mehta, Gita, & Cutler, Anne. (1988). Detection of target phonemes in spontaneous and read speech. Language and Speech 31(2):135–157.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Mendoza-Denton, Norma. (2003). Language and identity. In Chambers, J. K.Trudgill, P. & Schilling-Estes, N. (eds.), The handbook of language variation and change. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. 475–499.Google Scholar

Niedzielski, Nancy A. (1999). The effect of social information on the perception of sociolinguistic variables. In Milroy, L. & Preston, D. R. (eds.), Special issue: Attitudes, perception, and linguistic features. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 18(1):62–85.Google Scholar

Ochs, Elinor. (1992). Indexing gender. In Duranti, A. & Goodwin, C. (eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 335–358.Google Scholar

Plichta, Bartek, & Preston, Dennis R. (2005). The /ay/s have it: The perception of /ay/ as a North-South stereotype in US English. In Kristiansen, T.Coupland, N. & Garrett, P. (ed.), Theme issue: Subjective processes in language variation and change. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 37:243–285.Google Scholar

Rogers, Henry, & Smyth, Ron (2003). Phonetic differences between gay- and straight-sounding male speakers of North American English. In Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Solé, M. J.Recasens, D. & Romero, J., J. (ed.), Barcelona: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. 1855–1858.Google Scholar

Strand, Elizabeth A. (1999). Uncovering the roles of gender stereotypes in speech perception. In Milroy, L. & Preston, D. R. (eds.), Special issue: Attitudes, perception, and linguistic features. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 18(1):86–99.Google Scholar

Trudgill, Peter. (1974). The social differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wald, Benji, & Shopen, Timothy. (1985). A researcher's guide to the sociolinguistic variable (ING). In Clark, V.Escholtz, P. & Rosa, A. (eds.), Language: Introductory readings. New York: St. Martin's Press. 515–542.Google Scholar

Williams, Frederick, Hewett, Nancy, Hopper, Robert, Miller, Leslie M., Naremore, Rita C., & Whitehead, Jack L. (1976). Explorations of the linguistic attitudes of teachers. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar

Wyer, Robert S. Jr. (2004). Social comprehension and judgment: The role of situation models, narratives and implicit theories. Philadelphia: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Zahn, Christopher J., & Hopper, Robert. (1985). Measuring language attitudes: The speech evaluation instrument. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 4(2):113–123.Google Scholar

Zhang, Qing. (2005). A Chinese yuppie in Beijing: Phonological variation and the construction of a new professional identity. Language in Society 34:431–466.CrossRef Google Scholar