A comparison of inhibition in orientation and spatial frequency selectivity of cat visual cortex (original) (raw)

Nature volume 321, pages 237–239 (1986)Cite this article

Abstract

Neurones in the visual cortex are highly selective for orientation1 and spatial frequency2,3 of visual stimuli. There is strong neurophy-siological evidence that orientation selectivity is enhanced by inhibitory interconnections between columns in the cortex which have different orientation sensitivities4–6, an idea which is supported by experiments using neuropharmacological manipulation7,8 or complex visual stimuli6. It has also been proposed that selectivity for spatial frequency is mediated in part by a similar mechanism to that for orientation, although evidence for this is based on special use of visual stimuli, which hampers interpretation of the findings9,10. We have therefore examined selectivity for both orientation and spatial frequency using a technique which allows direct inferences about inhibitory processes. Our method uses microiontophoresis of an excitatory amino acid to elevate maintained discharge of single neurones in the visual cortex. We then present visual stimuli both within and outside the range of orientations and spatial frequencies which cause a cell to respond with increased discharge. Our results show that orientations presented on either side of the responsive range usually produce clear suppression of maintained discharge. In marked contrast, spatial frequencies shown to either side of the responsive range have little or no effect on maintained activity. We conclude that there is an intracortical organization of inhibitory connections between cells tuned to different orientations but not different spatial frequencies.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 51 print issues and online access

$199.00 per year

only $3.90 per issue

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hubel, D. H. & Wiesel, T. N. J. Physiol., Land. 160, 106–154 (1962).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  2. Campbell, F. W., Cooper, G. F. & Enroth-Cugell, C. J. Physiol., Lond. 203, 223–235 (1969).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  3. Maffei, L. & Fiorentini, A. Vision Res. 16, 1255–1267 (1973).
    Article Google Scholar
  4. Benevento, L. A., Creutzfeldt, O. D. & Kuhnt, V. Nature new Biol. 238, 124–126 (1972).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  5. Creutzfeldt, O. D., Kuhnt, U. & Benevento, L. A. Expl Brain Res. 21, 251–274 (1974).
    CAS Google Scholar
  6. Morrone, M. C., Burr, D. C. & Maffei, L. Proc. R. Soc. B216, 335–354 (1982).
    ADS CAS Google Scholar
  7. Sillito, A. M. J. Physiol., Lond. 250, 305–329 (1975); 289, 33–53 (1979).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  8. Sillito, A. M., Kemp, A., Milson, J. A. & Berardi, N. Brain Res. 194, 517–520 (1980).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  9. DeValois, K. K. & Tootell, R. B. H. J. Physiol., Lond. 336, 359–376 (1983).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  10. Bonds, A. B. Invest. Ophthal. vis. Sci. 24, 229 (1983).
    Google Scholar
  11. Ramoa, A. S., Freeman, R. D. & Macy, A. J. Neurophysiol. 54, 61–72 (1985).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  12. Hubel, D. H. & Wiesel, T. N. J. Neurophysiol. 28, 229–289 (1965).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  13. Gilbert, C. D. J. Physiol., Lond. 268, 391–421 (1977).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  14. Pettigrew, J. D., Nikara, T. & Bishop, P. O. Expl Brain Res. 6, 373–390 (1968).
    CAS Google Scholar

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Group in Neurobiology, School of Optometry, University of California, Berkeley, California, 94720, USA
    A. S. Ramoa, M. Shadlen, B. C. Skottun & R. D. Freeman
  2. Dept. de Farmacologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Centro de Ciencias da Saude, Bloco J, Ilha Universitaria, 21941, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
    A. S. Ramoa

Authors

  1. A. S. Ramoa
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  2. M. Shadlen
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  3. B. C. Skottun
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  4. R. D. Freeman
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ramoa, A., Shadlen, M., Skottun, B. et al. A comparison of inhibition in orientation and spatial frequency selectivity of cat visual cortex.Nature 321, 237–239 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1038/321237a0

Download citation

This article is cited by