Introduced species and their missing parasites (original) (raw)

Nature volume 421, pages 628–630 (2003)Cite this article

Abstract

Damage caused by introduced species results from the high population densities and large body sizes that they attain in their new location1,2,3,4. Escape from the effects of natural enemies is a frequent explanation given for the success of introduced species5,6. Because some parasites can reduce host density7,8,9,10,11,12,13 and decrease body size14, an invader that leaves parasites behind and encounters few new parasites can experience a demographic release and become a pest4,15. To test whether introduced species are less parasitized, we have compared the parasites of exotic species in their native and introduced ranges, using 26 host species of molluscs, crustaceans, fishes, birds, mammals, amphibians and reptiles. Here we report that the number of parasite species found in native populations is twice that found in exotic populations. In addition, introduced populations are less heavily parasitized (in terms of percentage infected) than are native populations. Reduced parasitization of introduced species has several causes, including reduced probability of the introduction of parasites with exotic species (or early extinction after host establishment), absence of other required hosts in the new location, and the host-specific limitations of native parasites adapting to new hosts.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 51 print issues and online access

$199.00 per year

only $3.90 per issue

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vitousek, P. M. Biological invasions and ecosystem processes: Towards an integration of population biology and ecosystem studies. Oikos 57, 7–13 (1990)
    Article Google Scholar
  2. Wilcove, D. S., Rothstein, D., Dubow, J., Phillips, A. & Losos, E. Quantifying threats to imperiled species in the United States. Bioscience 48, 607–615 (1998)
    Article Google Scholar
  3. Ruiz, G. M., Fofonoff, P., Hines, A. H. & Grosholz, E. D. Non-indigenous species as stressors in estuarine and marine communities: Assessing invasion impacts and interactions. Limnol. Oceanogr. 44, 950–972 (1999)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  4. Torchin, M. E., Lafferty, K. D. & Kuris, A. M. Parasites and marine invasions. Parasitology 124, S137–S151 (2002)
    Article Google Scholar
  5. Keane, R. M. & Crawley, M. J. Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17, 164–170 (2002)
    Article Google Scholar
  6. Shea, K. & Chesson, P. Community ecology theory as a framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17, 170–176 (2002)
    Article Google Scholar
  7. Crofton, H. D. A model of host–parasite relationships. Parasitology 63, 343–364 (1971)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  8. Anderson, R. M. & May, R. M. Regulation and stability of host–parasite population interactions I. Regulatory processes. J. Anim. Ecol. 47, 219–247 (1978)
    Article Google Scholar
  9. May, R. M. & Anderson, R. M. Regulation and stability of host–parasite population interactions II. Destabilizing processes. J. Anim. Ecol. 47, 249–267 (1978)
    Article Google Scholar
  10. Scott, M. E. Regulation of mouse colony abundance by Heligmosomoides polygyrus (Nematoda). Parasitology 95, 111–129 (1987)
    Article Google Scholar
  11. Gulland, F. M. D. The role of nematode parasites in Soay sheep Ovis aries L. mortality during a population crash. Parasitology 105, 493–503 (1992)
    Article Google Scholar
  12. Kuris, A. M. & Lafferty, K. D. Modeling crustacean fisheries: Effects of parasites on management strategies. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 49, 327–336 (1992)
    Article Google Scholar
  13. Hudson, P. J., Dobson, A. P. & Newborn, D. Prevention of population cycles by parasite removal. Science 282, 2256–2258 (1998)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  14. Torchin, M. E., Lafferty, K. D. & Kuris, A. M. Release from parasites as natural enemies: Increased performance of a globally introduced marine crab. Biol. Invas. 3, 333–345 (2001)
    Article Google Scholar
  15. Dobson, A. P. & May, R. M. in Ecology of Biological Invasions of North America and Hawaii (eds Mooney, H. A. & Drake, J. A.) 58–76 (Springer, New York, 1986)
    Book Google Scholar
  16. Shimura, S. & Ito, J. Two new species of marine cercariae from the Japanese intertidal gastropod Batillaria cumingii (Crosse). Jpn. J. Parasitol. 29, 369–375 (1980)
    Google Scholar
  17. Rybakov, A. V. & Lukomskaya, O. G. On the life cycle of Acanthoparyphium macracanthum sp.n. (Trematoda, Echinostomatidae). 22, 224–229 (1988)
  18. Harada, M. & Suguri, S. Surveys on cercariae in brackish water snails in Kagawa Prefecture, Shikoku, Japan. Jpn. J. Parasitol. 38, 388–391 (1989)
    Google Scholar
  19. Chapman, F. M. Handbook of Birds from Eastern North America (Dover, New York, 1966)
    Google Scholar
  20. Hair, J. D. & Forrester, D. J. The helminth parasites of the starling (Sturnus vulgaris L.): A checklist and analysis. Am. Midl. Nat. 83, 555–564 (1970)
    Article Google Scholar
  21. Mitchell, C. E. & Power, A. G. Release of invasive plants from fungal and viral pathogens. Nature 421, 625–627 (2003)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  22. Gregory, R. D. & Blackburn, T. M. Parasite prevalence and host sample size. Parasitol. Today 7, 316–318 (1991)
    Article CAS Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was conducted as part of the Diseases and Conservation Biology Working Group supported by the National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, a centre funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF), the University of California, and the Santa Barbara campus. We thank S. Altizer, S. Gaines, P. Hudson, H. McCallum, A. W. Miller, C. Mitchell and A. Power for discussion and comments; A. Dove and G. Ruiz for providing data; and L. Mababa for data collection. This research was supported by NSF through the NIH/NSF Ecology of Infectious Disease Program, and by the National Sea Grant College Program, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), US Department of Commerce through the California Sea Grant College System, and in part by the California State Resources Agency. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of NOAA or any of its subagencies. The US Government is authorized to reproduce and distribute for governmental purposes.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Marine Science Institute and Department of Ecology, Evolution and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, California, 93106, USA
    Mark E. Torchin, Valerie J. McKenzie & Armand M. Kuris
  2. US Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, c/o Marine Science Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, California, 93106, USA
    Kevin D. Lafferty
  3. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, 08544-1003, USA
    Andrew P. Dobson

Authors

  1. Mark E. Torchin
  2. Kevin D. Lafferty
  3. Andrew P. Dobson
  4. Valerie J. McKenzie
  5. Armand M. Kuris

Corresponding author

Correspondence toMark E. Torchin.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Torchin, M., Lafferty, K., Dobson, A. et al. Introduced species and their missing parasites.Nature 421, 628–630 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01346

Download citation

This article is cited by

Associated content