Discussion: Ambiguities in The Subjective Timing of Experiences Debate | Philosophy of Science | Cambridge Core (original) (raw)

Abstract

Some recent physiological data indicate that the “subjective timing” of experiences can be “automatically referred backwards in time” to represent a sequence of events even though the earlier portions of associated neurophysiological activity are themselves insufficient to elicit the experience of any sensation. The challenge, then, is to explain how subjects can experience what they do in the reported ways when, if one looked just at certain neurophysiological activity, it would seem that perhaps subjects should report their sensations differently. The phenomenon has seemed sufficiently remarkable to the neurobiologist John Eccles to count as evidence for mind-body dualism (Eccles 1977). This dualistic interpretation has resulted in a spirited attack by P. S. Churchland on both the physiological research and the dualistic interpretation (Churchland 1981a). Her attack resulted in an equally spirited defense of the research by the primary investigator, B. Libet, where he reaffirmed his more guarded interpretation that “the temporal discrepancy creates relative difficulties for identity theory, but that these are not insurmountable” (Libet 1981, p. 196). In turn, Churchland has defended her criticism of Libet's research so that, for her, Libet's hypothesis remains “infirm and unconfirmed” (Churchland 1981b, p. 496).

References

Broad, C. D. (1938), Examination of McTaggart's Philosophy, vol. II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Churchland, P. S. (1981a), “On the Alleged Backwards Referral of Experiences and Its Relevance to the Mind-Body Problem”, Philosophy of Science 48: 165–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Churchland, P. S. (1981b), “The Timing of Sensations: Reply to Libet”, Philosophy of Science 48: 492–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eccles, J. C. and Popper, K. R. (1977), The Self and Its Brain. New York: Springer International.Google ScholarPubMed

Hoy, R. C. (1976a), “A Note on Gustav Bergmann's Treatment of Temporal Consciousness”, Philosophy of Science 43: 610–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoy, R. C. (1976b), “Science and Temporal Experience: A Critical Defense of C. D. Broad's Theory of Temporal Cognition”, Philosophy Research Archives.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoy, R. C. (1980), “Dispositions, Logical States, and Mental Occurrents”, Synthese 44: 207–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

James, W. (1950), The Principles of Psychology, New York: Dover.Google Scholar

Libet, B. (1981), “The Experimental Evidence for Subjective Referral of a Sensory Experience Backwards in Time: A Reply to P. S. Churchland”, Philosophy of Science 48: 182–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sellars, W. (1981), “Foundations for a Metaphysics of Pure Process”, The Monist 64: 3–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar