Random Drift and the Omniscient Viewpoint | Philosophy of Science | Cambridge Core (original) (raw)

Abstract

Alexander Rosenberg (1994) claims that the omniscient viewpoint of the evolutionary process would have no need for the concept of random drift. However, his argument fails to take into account all of the processes which are considered to be instances of random drift. A consideration of these processes shows that random drift is not eliminable even given a position of omniscience. Furthermore, Rosenberg must take these processes into account in order to support his claims that evolution is deterministic and that evolutionary biology is an instrumental science.

References

Beatty, J. (1984), “Chance and Natural Selection”, Philosophy of Science 51: 183–211.10.1086/289177CrossRef Google Scholar

Beatty, J. (1992), “Random Drift”, in Keller, E. F. and Lloyd, E. A., (eds.), E. F. Keller and E. A. Lloyd, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 273–281.Google Scholar

Brandon, R. (1990), Adaptation and Environment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Cain, A. J. (1951), “So-Called Non-Adaptive or Neutral Characters in Evolution”, Nature 168: 424.10.1038/168424a0CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Cain, A. J. and Currey, J. D. (1963), “Area Effects in _Cepea_”, Cepea B 246: 1–81.Google Scholar

Darwin, C. ([1859] 1964), On the Origin of Species. Facsimile of the first edition. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Dobzhansky, T. (1959), “In Discussion of Lamotte, M.”, Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 24: 85–86.Google Scholar

Dodson, E. O. and Dodson, P. (1985), Evolution: Process and Product. 3rd ed. Boston: Prindle, Weber and Schmit.Google Scholar

Gigerenzer, G., Swijtink, Z., Porter, T., Daston, L., Beatty, J., and Krüger, L. (1989), The Empire of Chance: How Probability Changed Science and Everyday Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511720482CrossRef Google Scholar

Mayr, E. (1983), “How to Carry Out the Adaptationist Program?”, American Naturalist 121: 324–334.10.1086/284064CrossRef Google Scholar

Rosenberg, A. (1994), Instrumental Biology or the Disunity of Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar