CRISPR-ERA: a comprehensive design tool for CRISPR-mediated gene editing, repression and activation (original) (raw)
Journal Article
,
1Bioinformatics Division, Center for Synthetic and Systems Biology, TNLIST/Department of Automation, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China,
2Stanford Chemistry, Engineering & Medicine for Human Health (ChEM-H),
Search for other works by this author on:
,
1Bioinformatics Division, Center for Synthetic and Systems Biology, TNLIST/Department of Automation, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China,
Search for other works by this author on:
,
3Department of Bioengineering and
Search for other works by this author on:
,
1Bioinformatics Division, Center for Synthetic and Systems Biology, TNLIST/Department of Automation, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China,
Search for other works by this author on:
,
1Bioinformatics Division, Center for Synthetic and Systems Biology, TNLIST/Department of Automation, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China,
*To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Search for other works by this author on:
2Stanford Chemistry, Engineering & Medicine for Human Health (ChEM-H),
3Department of Bioengineering and
4Department of Chemical and Systems Biology, Stanford University, 443 Via Ortega, Shriram Center 376, Stanford, CA 94305-4125, USA
*To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Search for other works by this author on:
Revision received:
03 July 2015
Cite
Honglei Liu, Zheng Wei, Antonia Dominguez, Yanda Li, Xiaowo Wang, Lei S. Qi, CRISPR-ERA: a comprehensive design tool for CRISPR-mediated gene editing, repression and activation, Bioinformatics, Volume 31, Issue 22, November 2015, Pages 3676–3678, https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btv423
Close
Navbar Search Filter Mobile Enter search term Search
Abstract
Summary: The CRISPR/Cas9 system was recently developed as a powerful and flexible technology for targeted genome engineering, including genome editing (altering the genetic sequence) and gene regulation (without altering the genetic sequence). These applications require the design of single guide RNAs (sgRNAs) that are efficient and specific. However, this remains challenging, as it requires the consideration of many criteria. Several sgRNA design tools have been developed for gene editing, but currently there is no tool for the design of sgRNAs for gene regulation. With accumulating experimental data on the use of CRISPR/Cas9 for gene editing and regulation, we implement a comprehensive computational tool based on a set of sgRNA design rules summarized from these published reports. We report a genome-wide sgRNA design tool and provide an online website for predicting sgRNAs that are efficient and specific. We name the tool CRISPR-ERA, for clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat-mediated editing, repression, and activation (ERA).
Availability and implementation: http://CRISPR-ERA.stanford.edu.
Contact: stanley.qi@stanford.edu or xwwang@tsinghua.edu.cn
Supplementary information:Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
1 Introduction
The bacterial adaptive immune system, CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats), was recently developed as a powerful and multi-purpose technology for genome engineering, including editing (modifying the genomic sequence) (Cong et al ., 2013; Mali et al., 2013), and regulation (repressing or activating expression of genes) (Gilbert et al., 2013, 2014; Qi et al., 2013). The system is highly programmable, utilizing a single protein, the nuclease Cas9 for editing or the nuclease-deficient dCas9 for regulation. A single guide RNA (sgRNA) is required for precise and programmable DNA targeting (Doudna and Charpentier, 2014). Effective and specific genome engineering requires careful design of sgRNAs, which remains a major challenge. Computational tools have been used to facilitate the design of sgRNAs for CRISPR editing but not for other applications such as transcriptional regulation. These computational tools should enable automated sgRNA design and off-target site validation (Bae et al., 2014; Doench et al., 2014; Heigwer et al., 2014; O'Brien and Bailey, 2014; Xiao et al., 2014). A major goal of our designer tool is to address the discrepancy for designing sgRNAs that allow efficient and highly specific repression or activation of genes and for generating genome-wide sgRNA libraries for genetic screening in different organisms.
Here, we describe CRISPR-ERA webserver, an automated and comprehensive sgRNA design tool for CRISPR-mediated editing, repression, and activation (ERA) (Fig. 1). CRISPR-ERA utilizes a fast algorithm to search for genome-wide sgRNA binding sites and evaluates their efficiency and specificity using a set of rules summarized from published data for CRISPR editing, repression and activation (Cong et al ., 2013; Doudna and Charpentier, 2014; Gilbert et al., 2014; Qi et al., 2013; Ran et al., 2013). The design features are annotated and the target sites can be visualized in a genome browser. We also provide a local version for the generation of whole-genome sgRNA libraries.
Fig. 1.
CRISPR-ERA workflow and example. The CRISPR-ERA algorithm takes input information, including types of genome manipulation, organism, and gene name or genome location, and then computes and evaluates sgRNAs within the targeted genome region. By default, for editing, the algorithm chooses sgRNA sequences within coding region; for repression, the algorithm computes sgRNA binding sites within a 3 kb region centered at TSS (or the sense strand of the 5′ end of the gene for bacteria only); for activation, the algorithm computes sgRNA binding sites up to 1.5 kb upstream of TSS. In this figure, mouse gene Sox2 is shown as an example. E, efficacy score; S, specificity penalty score (Supplementary Methods)
2 Methods
For each target gene or genomic site, CRISPR-ERA first searches all targetable sites in that particular organism for patterns of N20NGG (N = any nucleotide). Each target sequence is then calculated for two scores (Supplementary Methods): (i) an efficacy score (E-score) based on the sequence features such as GC content (%GC), presence of poly-thymidine (which is a terminator for effective transcription of sgRNAs), and location information such as the distance from target gene transcriptional start sites (TSS); and (ii) a specificity score (S-score) based on the genome-wide off-target binding sites. For each sgRNA design, we compute the genome-wide sequences that contain an adjacent NRG (R = A or G) protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) site and zero, one, two, or three mismatches complementary to the sgRNA using Bowtie (Langmead et al., 2009), which are regarded as off-target binding sites. The penalty score for NAG off-target is smaller than NGG off-target. The sgRNAs are finally ranked by the sum of E-score and S-score (Fig. 1; Supplementary Fig. S1).
We implement a user-friendly web server (http://CRISPR-ERA.stanford.edu) that hosts the web application for the sgRNA designer tool. The webserver will host a broad category of sequenced organisms. Currently, it provides sgRNA design service for nine most commonly used prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms including Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Drosophila melanogaster, Caenorhabditis elegans, Danio rerio, Rattus norvegicus, Mus musculus, and Homo sapiens, etc_._ (Supplementary Table S1.). The web application enables rapid searching in the pre-assembled sgRNA database using an indexing searching approach (Supplementary Methods). The program outputs the sequence, target location, off-target details of the possible sgRNAs, their E- and S-scores etc. Results can be visualized using the UCSC genome browser to highlight the custom tracks (Supplementary Fig. S2 and Supplementary Data).
3 Conclusions
CRISPR-ERA enables easy, fast, and predictive design of sgRNAs for broad applications of CRISPR in genome editing, gene repression and activation. The tool can be applied to other types of CRISPR applications such as genome imaging (Chen et al., 2013) and CRISPR synthetic circuit design (Kiani et al., 2014), and expanded to other organisms. We also provide the source code for the generation of whole-genome sgRNA libraries, useful for genome-wide screening based on CRISPR, CRISPRi or CRISPRa (Gilbert et al., 2014, Shalem et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2013).
Funding
L.S.Q. acknowledges support from NIH Office of The Director (OD), and National Institute of Dental & Craniofacial Research (NIDCR). H.L., Z.W., Y.L. and X.W. are supported by the 973 program (2012CB316503), NSFC (grant number 61322310, 31371341) and FANEDD (grant number 201158). This work was also supported by NIH Director’s Early Independence Award (grant number OD017887, L.S.Q.) and NIH R01 (grant number DA036858, L.S.Q.).
Conflict of Interest: none declared.
References
et al. . (
2014
)
Cas-OFFinder: a fast and versatile algorithm that searches for potential off-target sites of Cas9 RNA-guided endonucleases
.
Bioinformatics
,
30
,
1473
–
1475
.
et al. . (
2013
)
Dynamic imaging of genomic loci in living human cells by an optimized CRISPR/Cas system
.
Cell
,
155
,
1479
–
1491
.
et al. . (
2013
)
Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems
.
Science
,
339
,
819
–
823
.
et al. . (
2014
)
Rational design of highly active sgRNAs for CRISPR-Cas9–mediated gene inactivation
.
Nat. Biotechnol.
,
32
,
1262
–
1267
.
(
2014
)
The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9
.
Science
,
346
,
1258096
–
1258096
.
et al. . (
2013
)
CRISPR-mediated modular RNA-guided regulation of transcription in eukaryotes
.
Cell
,
154
,
442
–
451
.
et al. . (
2014
)
Genome-scale CRISPR-mediated control of gene repression and activation
.
Cell
,
159
,
647
–
661
.
et al. . (
2014
)
E-CRISP: fast CRISPR target site identification
.
Nat. Methods
,
11
,
122
–
123
.
et al. . (
2014
)
CRISPR transcriptional repression devices and layered circuits in mammalian cells
.
Nat. Methods
,
11
,
723
–
726
.
et al. . (
2009
)
Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome
.
Genome Biol.
,
10
,
R25
.
et al. . (
2013
)
RNA-guided human genome Engineering via Cas9
.
Science
,
339
,
823
–
826
.
(
2014
)
GT-Scan: identifying unique genomic targets
.
Bioinformatics
,
30
,
2673
–
2675
.
et al. . (
2013
)
Repurposing CRISPR as an RNA-guided platform for sequence-specific control of gene expression
.
Cell
,
152
,
1173
–
1183
.
et al. . (
2013
)
Double nicking by RNA-guided CRISPR Cas9 for enhanced genome editing specificity
.
Cell
,
155
,
479
–
480
.
et al. . (
2013
)
Genome-scale CRISPR-Cas9 knockout screening in human cells
.
Science
,
343
,
84
–
87
.
et al. . (
2013
)
Genetic screens in human cells using the CRISPR-Cas9 system
.
Science
,
343
,
80
–
84
.
et al. . (
2014
)
CasOT: a genome-wide Cas9/gRNA off-target searching tool
.
Bioinformatics
,
30
,
1180
–
1182
.
Author notes
Associate Editor: John Hancock
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
Supplementary data
Comments
1 Comment
The authors have published a Bio-protocol for one of the methods used in this study
24 November 2017
dennis.bua@ed.bio-protocol.org
Bio-protocol
The authors have published a step-by-step version of one of the methods used in this study in Bio-protocol:
Liu, H., Wang, X. and Qi, L. S. (2017). Using CRISPR-ERA Webserver for sgRNA Design. Bio-protocol 7(17): e2522. DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.2522.
Submitted on 24/11/2017 9:02 PM GMT
Citations
Views
Altmetric
Metrics
Total Views 7,814
5,872 Pageviews
1,942 PDF Downloads
Since 11/1/2016
Month: | Total Views: |
---|---|
November 2016 | 5 |
December 2016 | 24 |
January 2017 | 39 |
February 2017 | 104 |
March 2017 | 62 |
April 2017 | 75 |
May 2017 | 77 |
June 2017 | 50 |
July 2017 | 64 |
August 2017 | 54 |
September 2017 | 52 |
October 2017 | 62 |
November 2017 | 63 |
December 2017 | 169 |
January 2018 | 161 |
February 2018 | 121 |
March 2018 | 115 |
April 2018 | 150 |
May 2018 | 116 |
June 2018 | 81 |
July 2018 | 66 |
August 2018 | 105 |
September 2018 | 65 |
October 2018 | 76 |
November 2018 | 128 |
December 2018 | 82 |
January 2019 | 86 |
February 2019 | 93 |
March 2019 | 96 |
April 2019 | 104 |
May 2019 | 99 |
June 2019 | 53 |
July 2019 | 87 |
August 2019 | 77 |
September 2019 | 72 |
October 2019 | 95 |
November 2019 | 129 |
December 2019 | 73 |
January 2020 | 80 |
February 2020 | 67 |
March 2020 | 102 |
April 2020 | 71 |
May 2020 | 45 |
June 2020 | 45 |
July 2020 | 68 |
August 2020 | 63 |
September 2020 | 105 |
October 2020 | 117 |
November 2020 | 96 |
December 2020 | 90 |
January 2021 | 73 |
February 2021 | 70 |
March 2021 | 123 |
April 2021 | 136 |
May 2021 | 98 |
June 2021 | 93 |
July 2021 | 82 |
August 2021 | 56 |
September 2021 | 94 |
October 2021 | 105 |
November 2021 | 112 |
December 2021 | 80 |
January 2022 | 78 |
February 2022 | 96 |
March 2022 | 109 |
April 2022 | 109 |
May 2022 | 76 |
June 2022 | 82 |
July 2022 | 66 |
August 2022 | 65 |
September 2022 | 83 |
October 2022 | 113 |
November 2022 | 74 |
December 2022 | 76 |
January 2023 | 42 |
February 2023 | 43 |
March 2023 | 61 |
April 2023 | 79 |
May 2023 | 73 |
June 2023 | 53 |
July 2023 | 62 |
August 2023 | 46 |
September 2023 | 51 |
October 2023 | 54 |
November 2023 | 45 |
December 2023 | 61 |
January 2024 | 146 |
February 2024 | 106 |
March 2024 | 92 |
April 2024 | 92 |
May 2024 | 74 |
June 2024 | 56 |
July 2024 | 46 |
August 2024 | 62 |
September 2024 | 82 |
October 2024 | 60 |
Citations
144 Web of Science
×
Email alerts
Citing articles via
More from Oxford Academic