Restrictive Interpretation of Human Rights Treaties in the Recent Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights (original) (raw)

Journal Article

Search for other works by this author on:

Cite

Alexander Orakhelashvili, Restrictive Interpretation of Human Rights Treaties in the Recent Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights, European Journal of International Law, Volume 14, Issue 3, June 2003, Pages 529–568, https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/14.3.529
Close

Navbar Search Filter Mobile Enter search term Search

Abstract

The European Convention on Human Rights was adopted as an instrument to protect the rights and interests of individual human beings rather than of state parties. It thus embodies obligations which objectively protect human beings and are not reducible to mutual or reciprocal legal commitments of states. The jurisprudence of the Convention organs has recognized the importance of the nature of the Convention obligations, and has interpreted and applied a number of its substantive and procedural provisions accordingly. This has become possible through the use of appropriate methods of treaty interpretation, dictated by the character of the Convention obligations. In particular, the Convention organs refused to interpret the Convention restrictively, as this would endanger its integral application which is inherent to the Convention's object and purpose. However, the recent jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights indicates some trends which undermine the rationale of the Convention through the use of interpretive methods that are of doubtful value in cases in which they are applied. This article examines the Court's recent jurisprudence, and concludes that adherence to such interpretation approaches endangers the very rationale of the European Convention and its ability to effectively benefit those it has been designed to protect.

Author notes

1Jesus College, Cambridge

Copyright Oxford University Press 2003

Citations

Views

Altmetric

Metrics

Total Views 3,182

1,745 Pageviews

1,437 PDF Downloads

Since 11/1/2016

Month: Total Views:
November 2016 1
January 2017 10
February 2017 20
March 2017 20
April 2017 9
May 2017 8
June 2017 14
July 2017 8
August 2017 10
September 2017 28
October 2017 18
November 2017 17
December 2017 29
January 2018 35
February 2018 35
March 2018 57
April 2018 27
May 2018 41
June 2018 34
July 2018 36
August 2018 31
September 2018 44
October 2018 28
November 2018 31
December 2018 19
January 2019 18
February 2019 28
March 2019 19
April 2019 49
May 2019 35
June 2019 23
July 2019 30
August 2019 25
September 2019 26
October 2019 11
November 2019 41
December 2019 55
January 2020 30
February 2020 35
March 2020 30
April 2020 47
May 2020 17
June 2020 34
July 2020 21
August 2020 29
September 2020 36
October 2020 31
November 2020 42
December 2020 49
January 2021 20
February 2021 27
March 2021 27
April 2021 54
May 2021 96
June 2021 25
July 2021 30
August 2021 20
September 2021 19
October 2021 44
November 2021 63
December 2021 40
January 2022 22
February 2022 37
March 2022 21
April 2022 42
May 2022 18
June 2022 41
July 2022 14
August 2022 31
September 2022 28
October 2022 22
November 2022 36
December 2022 31
January 2023 47
February 2023 22
March 2023 37
April 2023 38
May 2023 47
June 2023 27
July 2023 32
August 2023 29
September 2023 23
October 2023 40
November 2023 61
December 2023 42
January 2024 79
February 2024 60
March 2024 102
April 2024 80
May 2024 60
June 2024 60
July 2024 50
August 2024 29
September 2024 38

×

Email alerts

Citing articles via

More from Oxford Academic