The Stability of Psychiatric Diagnoses | The British Journal of Psychiatry | Cambridge Core (original) (raw)

Extract

Numerous studies of the reliability of psychiatric diagnosis have been published in the last twenty years, but most have been based either on a comparison of the diagnoses made by two or more raters at a single joint interview, or separate interviews a few days apart (the observer agreement model), or on a comparison of the overall spectrum of diagnoses assigned to two comparable series of patients (the frequency agreement model). Comparisons between the diagnoses assigned to patients on successive admissions, or at other widely separated points in time (the consistency or stability model), have been carried out less often, in spite of the fact that the usefulness of our diagnostic categories is just as dependent on temporal stability as on reliability in an observer agreement situation.

Type

Research Article

References

Babigian, H. M., Gardner, E. A., Miles, H. C., and Romano, J. (1965). ‘Diagnostic consistency and change in a follow-up study of 1,215 patients.’ American Journal of Psychiatry, 121, 895–901.CrossRef Google Scholar

Cooper, J. E. (1967). ‘Diagnostic change in a longitudinal study of psychiatric patients.’ British Journal of Psychiatry, 113, 129–42.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lewis, N. D. C., and Piotrowski, Z. A. (1954). ‘Clinical diagnosis of manic-depressive psychosis’, in Depression (ed. Hoch, and Zubin, ), pp. 25–38. .Google Scholar

Masserman, J. H., and Carmichael, H. T. (1938). ‘Diagnosis and prognosis in psychiatry.’ Journal of Mental Science, 84, 893–946.Google Scholar

Ødegaard, Ø. (1966). ‘An official diagnostic classification in actual hospital practice.’ Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 42, 329–37.Google Scholar

Roth, M., Gurney, C., Garside, R. F., and Kerr, T. A. (1972). ‘Studies in the classification of affective disorders: the relationship between anxiety states and depressive illnesses.’ British Journal of Psychiatry, 121, 147–61.Google Scholar