Dominant Male Ideology and Female Options: Three East African Case Studies1 | Africa | Cambridge Core (original) (raw)

Extract

The aim of the essay is to highlight gaps in existing knowledge of African women and bring to light new queries. The argument being presented is that African women assert their individuality by exploring the options available within their respective societies. While it is unsafe to generalize about Africa, the dominance of men in the public, especially the political and ritual spheres, is well illustrated by ethnographies on Africa. Women are on the whole invisible or shadowy figures except in a handful of ethnographies that take a woman's perspective (for example, Leith-Ross, 1939; Kaberry, 1952; and Paulme (ed.), 1963). The ideology of male dominance is taken for granted as representative of the true state of affairs between men and women in Africa. Whereas every researcher probably knows that ideologies are not realities, somehow that knowledge becomes insignificant when dealing with African societies.

Résumé

LES POSSIBILITES OFFERTES AUX FEMMES A L'INTERIEUR D'UNE IDEOLOGIE A PREDOMINANCE MASCULINE

La réalité sociale ne se conforme généralement pas à l'idéologie. Les membres d'une société apprennent sans cesse les règles sur lesquelles est fondée cette dernière, les modifient, agissent sur elles ou les rejettent. Cette étude examine la manière dont certaines femmes n'ont cessé d'améliorer leur position sociale sans dévier des normes d'une société à l'intérieur de laquelle le rapport des pouvoirs entre les sexes demeure assymétrique. L'analyse s'attache à élucider les diverses possibilités qui s'offrent à la masse des Africaines dans les zones urbaines et rurales. Le fait que de telles possibilités existent est ici l'élément fondamental qui demeure plus important que le nombre même des femmes qui les adoptent. De plus, nous affirmons qu'on ne peut vraiment comprendre la position des Africaines que dans la mesure où l'on aura examiné avec soin le cadre conceptuel dans lequel elles évoluent. Il existe à l'intérieur des systèmes de clan et de lignage des possibilités ou des variations qui permettent aux individus de mener une vie pleine. Ainsi, le mariage de femme à femme et famille matrifocale (en ville ou à la campagne) représentent quelques unes de ces possibilités.

References

Ardener, Edwin. 1972. ‘Belief and the Problem of Women’ in The Interpretation of Ritual, Fontaine, J. S. La (ed.). London: Tavistock.Google Scholar

Bailey, F. G. 1969. Strategems and Spoils. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Barth, Fredrik. 1966. Models of Social Organization. Occasional Papers of the Royal Anthropological Institute, No. 23. London: Royal Anthropological Institute.Google Scholar

Billingsley, Andrew. 1973. ‘Black Families and White Social Science’ in The Death of White Sociology. Ladner, J. (ed.). New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Bohannan, Laura. 1949. ‘Dahomean Marriage: A Revaluation’. Africa, xix. 4.Google Scholar

Clarke, Edith. 1957. My Mother Who Fathered Me. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

Edgerton, R. and Conant, F. P. 1964. ‘Kilpat: The “Shaming Party” among the Pokot of East Africa’. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, xx. 404–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elkan, W. 1959. ‘The Persistence of Migrant Laborers’. Inter-African Labor Institute Bulletin, vi. 5: 36–43Google Scholar

Evans-Pritchard, E. E. 1945. Some Aspects of Marriage and the Family Among the Nuer. Rhodes-Livingstone Institute Papers, No. 11.Google Scholar

Evans-Pritchard, E. E. 1951. Kinship and Marriage among the Nuer. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Evans-Pritchard, E. E. 1965. The Position of Women in Primitive Societies and Other Essays in Social Anthropology. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Evans-Pritchard, E. E. 1970. ‘Azande Matrimonial Problem’. Anthropological Quarterly, xliii. 1: 215–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Firth, Raymond. 1951. Elements of Social Organisation. London: Watts & Co.Google Scholar

Forde, Daryll. 1951. The Yoruba-Speaking Peoples of Southwestern Nigeria. Ethnographic Survey of Africa. London: I.A.I.Google Scholar

Fortes, Meyer. 1949. The Web of Kinship Among the Tallensi: The Second Part of an Analysis of Social Structure ofa Trans-Volta Tribe. London: Oxford University Press for I.A.I.Google Scholar

Frazier, E. Franklin. 1939. The Negro Family in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Gluckman, Max. 1950. ‘Kinship and Marriage among the Lozi of Northern Rhodesia and the Zulu of Natal’, in Radcliffe-Brown and Daryll Forde: 166-206. London: Oxford University Press for I.A.I.Google Scholar

Gough, E. K. 1959. ‘The Nayar and the Definition of Marriage’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, lxxxix. 23–34.Google Scholar

Harris, H. 1940. ‘The Position of Women in a Nigerian Society’. Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences, Series 2, ii. 5: 6–7.Google Scholar

Hellman, E. 1948. Rooiyard: A Sociological Survey of an Urban Native Slum Yard. Rhodes-Livingstone Papers, No. 13.Google Scholar

Henriques, Fernando. 1953. Family and Colour in Jamaica. London: Eyre and Spottiswoode.Google Scholar

Herskovits, M. J. 1937. ‘A Note on Woman Marriage in Dahomey’, Africa, x. 3.Google Scholar

Herskovits, M. J. 1938. Dahomey: An Ancient West African Kingdom, Vol. 1. New York: Augustine.Google Scholar

Hodder, B. W. 1962. ‘The Yoruba rural market’ in Bohannan, P. and Dalton, G. (eds.), Markets in Africa. Evanston, Illinois.Google Scholar

Kaberry, Phyllis M. 1952. Women of the Grassfields. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar

Kenyatta, Jomo. 1938. Facing Mount Kenya. London: Seeker & Warburg.Google Scholar

Kerr, Madeline. 1958. The People of Ship Street. London: Routledge, Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Klima, George. 1964. ‘Jural Relations Between the Sexes Among the Barabaig (Tanzania)’. Africa, xxxiv. 1: 9–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krige, E. Jensen and Krige, J. D. 1943. The Realm of the RainQueen. London: Oxford University Press for I.A.I.Google Scholar

Krige, E. J. 1974. ‘Woman Marriage with Special Reference to the Lovedu’. Africa, xliv. 1: 11–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuper, Hilda. 1950. ‘Kinship among the Swazi’, in Radcliffe-Brown, and Forde, Daryll (eds.), African Systems of Kinship and Marriage. London: Oxford University Press for I.A.I.Google Scholar

Leach, F. R. 1954. Political Systems of the Highland Burma. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Leith-Ross, Sylvia. 1939. African Women. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar

Lewis, Oscar. 1965. La Vida: A Puerto Rican Family in the Culture of Poverty. San Juan and New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Little, Kenneth, 1951. The Mende of Sierra Leone. London: Routledge, Kegan and Paul.Google Scholar

Little, Kenneth, 1973. African Women in Towns: An Aspect of Africa's Social Revolution. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mair, Lucy P. 1934. An African People in the Twentieth Century. London: George Routledge and Sons.Google Scholar

Mair, Lucy P. 1971. Marriage. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Mukwaya, A. 1953. Land Tenure in Buganda. Kampala: East African Studies No. 1 (E.A.I.S.R.).Google Scholar

Muthiani, Joseph. 1973. Akamba From Within. New York: Exposition Press.Google Scholar

Parkin, David, 1969. Neighbours and Nationals in an African City Ward. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Denise, Paulme (ed.). 1963 Womanof Tropical Africa. Berkeley: California University Press. (Originally published in French, 1960.)Google Scholar

Perham, Margery. 1937. Native Administration in Nigeria. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. and Forde, D. (eds.). 1950. African Systems of Kinship and Marriage. London: Oxford University Press for I.A.I.Google Scholar

Richards, A. I. 1954. Economic Development and Tribal Change. Cambridge: Heffer.Google Scholar

Ritzenthaler, R. E. 1960. ‘Anlu: A Women's Uprising in British Cameroons’. African Studies, xix. 151–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Riviere, P. G. 1971. ‘Marriage: a reassessment’ in Needham, R. (ed.), Rethinking Kinship and Marriage. ASA monographs 11. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar

Safa, Helen Icken. 1967. Analysis of Upward Mobility in Low Income Families. Syracuse N.Y.: Youth Development Centre.Google Scholar

Schneider, Harold. 1970. The Wahi Wanyaturu Economics in an African Society. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Co.Google Scholar

Smith, Raymond. 1956. The Negro Family in British Guiana. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, Ltd.Google Scholar

Smith, Raymond. 1973 ‘The Matrifocal Family’ in Goody, J. (ed.), The Character of Kinship. London: Cambridge University Ptess.Google Scholar

Southall, A. W. and Gutkind, P. C. W. 1957. Townsmen in the Making. East African Studies E. A.I.S.R., Kampala.Google Scholar

Southall, A. W. 1960. ‘On Chastity in Africa’. Uganda Journal, xxiv. 2: 207–216.Google Scholar

Southall, A. W. 1961 (ed.). Social Change in Modern Africa: Introduction. London: Oxford University Press for I.A.I.Google Scholar

Uchendu, Victor C. 1965. The Igbo of Southeast Nigeria. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar

Valentine, Charles A. 1968. Culture of Poverty. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar

Willis, Roy G. 1966. The Fipa and Related Peoples of Southwest Tanzania and Northeast Zambia. Ethnographic Survey of Africa. London: International African Institute.Google Scholar

Wilson, Monica. 1950. ‘Nyakyusa Kinship’ in Radcliffe-Brown, and Forde, (eds.) African Systems of Kinship and Marriage. London: Oxford University Press for I.A.I.Google Scholar

Winch, R. F. 1968. ‘Marriage: family formation’ in International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. Vol. 10. Crowell Collier and Macmillan.Google Scholar

Woodburn, James. 1972. ‘Ecology, Nomadic Movement and the Composition of the Local Groups Among the Hunters and Gatherers: An East African Example and Its Implications’ in Ucko, Peter J., Tingham, Ruth and Dimbleby, G. W. (eds.), Man, Settlement and Urbanism. London: Duckworth; Cambridge, Mass.: Schenkman.Google Scholar