Political Context and Attitude Change | American Political Science Review | Cambridge Core (original) (raw)

Abstract

Political context has an important impact on individual attitude change. This is an analysis of the dynamic effects of contextual variables. Drawing on data taken from the American National Election Study (ANES) panel study, we demonstrate that the environment shapes the way the citizen views politics. While varying in degree, the results hold for a broad (county-level) and a narrow (residential neighborhood-level) definition of the relevant context. The patterns involved suggest that citizens' evaluations of candidates and parties are most directly influenced by what their neighbors are saying at the moment, that is to say, the content of current discussion. In contrast, citizens' self-identification evinces sensitivity to the more stable partisan character of the environment. The results indicate that the impact of social influence is crucially dependent on the nature of contemporary political debate and that the social setting serves as an intervening mechanism in the broader communication system and not merely as an exogenous source for political information.

References

Berelson, Benard R., Lazarsfeld, Paul F., and McPhee, William N.. 1954. Voting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Bodman, A. R. 1983. The Neighborhood Effect: A Test of the Butler-Stokes Model. British Journal of Political Science 13:243–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, Thad A. 1981. On Contextual Change and Partisan Attitudes. British Journal of Political Science 11:427–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, Thad A. 1987. Migration and Politics. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar

Butler, David, and Stokes, Donald. 1969. Political Change in Britain. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar

Huckfeldt, R. Robert. 1983a. The Social Context of Political Change: Durability, Volatility, and Social Influence. American Political Science Review 77:929–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huckfeldt, R. Robert. 1983b. Social Contexts, Social Networks, and Urban Neighborhoods: Environmental Constraints upon Friendship Choice. American Journal of Sociology 89:651–69.10.1086/227908CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huckfeldt, R. Robert, and Sprague, John. 1986. Social Contexts, Political Environments, and the Dynamics of Voter Preferences. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Katz, Elihu, and Lazarsfeld, Paul F.. 1955. Personal Influence. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Langton, Kenneth P., and Rapoport, Ronald. 1975. Social Structure, Social Context, and Partisan Mobilization: Urban Workers in Chile. Comparative Political Studies 8:318–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McPhee, William N. 1963. A Theory of Informal Social Influence. In Formal Theories of Mass Behavior, ed. Phee, William N.. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

McPhee, William N., and Smith, Robert B.. 1962. A Model for Analyzing Voting Systems. In Public Opinion and Congressional Elections, ed. McPhee, William N. and Glaser, William A.. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Miller, Warren E. 1956. One-party Politics and the Voter. American Political Science Review 50:707–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, William L. 1977. Electoral Dynamics. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Prysby, Charles L. 1976. Community Partisanship and Individual Voting Behavior: Methodological Problems of Contextual Analysis. Political Methodology 3:183–89.Google Scholar

Putnam, Robert D. 1966. Political Attitudes and the Local Community. American Political Science Review 60:640–54.10.2307/1952976CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robinson, John P. 1976. Interpersonal Influence in Election Campaigns: Two Step-Flow Hypotheses. Public Opinion Quarterly 40:304–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sprague, John. 1982. Is There a Micro Theory Consistent with Contextual Analysis? In Strategies of Political Inquiry, ed. Ostrom, Elinor. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Tingsten, Herbert. 1937. Political Behaviour. London: King.Google Scholar

Weatherford, M. Stephen. 1982. Interpersonal Networks and Political Behavior. American Journal of Political Science 26:117–43.10.2307/2110843CrossRefGoogle Scholar