Pollen Analysis and Mexican Archaeology: An Attempt to Apply the Method* | American Antiquity | Cambridge Core (original) (raw)

Extract

The studies reported here were made during a brief field trip to Mexico in the summer of 1941, when two weeks were spent in Mexico City and one week was spent in Michoacán. In so far as archaeological material was touched, they represent a venture into a field of research in which the author possesses no competence or previous training. The main object of the trip was limnological, and financial resources were meager. How blind the resulting gropings were was fully appreciated only after the trip, when a better acquaintance with the literature on Middle America was possible. Although some definite results were achieved in the form of a respectable pollen sequence 6.2 meters in length, obtained from deposits of the modern Lake Patzcuaro, the pollen analyses from cultural sites in the Valley of Mexico and at Tzintzuntzan were negative. Nevertheless, it is felt that their publication is justified, since the method, if properly applied, holds distinct promise, and future workers will undoubtedly wish to know what was done and wherein the failure lay.

References

BATALLA, MARIA AGUSTINA 1940. “Botánica del Lago de P átzcuaro y sus Riberas.” Prospecto Biológico del Lago de Pótzcuaro, Anales del Instituto de Biologica de la Universidad Nacionalde México, Vol. 11, pp. 427–442.Google Scholar

BRYAN, K., and RAY, L. L. 1940. Geologic Antiquity of the Lindenmeier Site in Colorado. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, Vol. 99, No. 2. Washington.Google Scholar

CAIN, S. A. 1939. “Pollen Analysis as a Paleo-Ecological Research Method.” Botanical Review, Vol. 5, pp. 627–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

CASO, A. 1930. “Informe Preliminar de las Exploraciones Realizadas en Michoac án.” Anales del Museo Nacional de Arqueologia, Historia y Etnografia, 4a época, Vol. 6, pp. 446–452.Google Scholar

CUMMINGS, B. C. 1926. “Cuicuilco and the Archaic Culture of Mexico.” Scientific Monthly, Vol. 23, pp. 289–304.Google Scholar

CUMMINGS, B. C. 1933. Cuicuilco and the Archaic Culture of Mexico. University of Arizona Bulletin, Vol. 4, No. 8; Social Science Bulletin, No. 4, pp. 1–56.Google Scholar

DEBUEN, F. 1940, Lista de Peces de Agua Duke de México. En Preparation de su Catálogo. Estaci ón Limnol ógica de Pátzcuaro, Trabajos, No. 2, pp. 1–66.Google Scholar

DEBUEN, F. 1941. “El Lago de Pátzcuaro. Recientes Estudios Limnológicos.” Revista Geográfica, Instituto Panamericano de Geografía e Historia, Vol. 1, pp. 20–4.Google Scholar

DEEVEY, E. S. Jr. 1937. “Pollen from Interglacial Beds in the Pang-Gong Valley and Its Climatic Interpretation.” American Journal of Science, 5th Series, Vol. 33, pp. 44–56.Google Scholar

DEEVEY, E. S. Jr. 1939. “Studies on Connecticut Lake Sediments. I. A Postglacial Climatic Chronology for Southern New England.” American Journal of Science, Vol. 237, pp. 691–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DUNN, E. R. 1939. Bathysiredon, a New Genus of Salamanders from Mexico. Notulae Naturae, Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, No. 36.Google Scholar

EKHOLM, G. F. 1940. The Archaeology of Northern and Western Mexico. In The Maya and Their Neighbors, pp. 320–330. New York.Google Scholar

ERDTMANN, G. 1927. “Literature on Pollen-Statistics Published before 1927.” Geologiska Föreningen i Stockholm Förhandlingar, Vol. 49, pp. 196–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

ERDTMANN, G. 1930. “Literature on Pollen-Statistics Published during the Years 1927-1929.” Geologiska Föreningeni Stockholm Förhandlingar, Vol. 52, pp. 191–213.Google Scholar

ERDTMANN, G. 1932. “Literature on Pollen-Statistics and Related Topics Published 1930 and 1931.” Geologiska Föreningeni Stockholm Förhandlingar, Vol. 54, pp. 395–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

ERDTMANN, G. 1934a. “Literature on Pollen-Statistics and Related Topics Published 1932 and 1933.” Geologiska Fsreningen i Stockholm Förhandlingar, Vol. 46, pp. 463–481.Google Scholar

ERDTMANN, G. 1934b. “Ueber die Verwendung von Essigsa ü reanhydrid bei Pollenuntersuchimgen.” Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift, Vol. 28, pp. 354–358. Stockholm.Google Scholar

ERDTMANN, G. 1935. “Literature on Pollen-Statistics and Related Topics Published 1934.” Geologiska Föreningeni Stockholm Förhandlingar, Vol. 57, pp. 261–274.Google Scholar

ERDTMANN, G. 1937a. “Literature on Pollen-Statistics and Related Topics Published 1935 and 1936.” Geologiska Föreningeni Stockholm Förhandlingar, Vol. 59, pp. 157–181.Google Scholar

ERDTMANN, G. 1937b. “Pollen Grains Recovered from the Atmosphere over the Atlantic.” Meddelanden fra Goteborgs Botaniska Tradgard, Vol. 12, pp. 185–196.Google Scholar

ERDTMANN, G. 1940. “Literature on Pollen-Statistics Published 1937-1939.” Geologiska Föreningeni Stockholm FSrhandlingar, Vol. 62, pp. 61–97.Google Scholar

GAMIO, M. 1920. “Las Excavaciones del Pedregal de San Angel y la Cultura Arcaica del Valle de M é xico.” American Anthropologist, n.s., Vol. 22, pp. 127–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

GODWIN, H. 1934. “Pollen Analysis, An Outline of the Problems and Potentialities of the Method.” New Phytologist, Vol. 33, pp. 278–305, 325-358.Google Scholar

GODWIN, H. 1940. “Studies of the Post-Glacial History of British Vegetation. III. Fenland Pollen Diagrams. IV. Post-Glacial Changes of Relative Land- and Sea- Level in the English Fenland.” Philosophical Transactions, Royal Society of London, Series B, Vol. 230, pp. 239–303.Google Scholar

GODWIN, H., and CLIFFORD, M. H. 1938. “Studies of the Post-Glacial History of British Vegetation. I. Origin and Stratigraphy of Fenland Deposits near Woodwalton, Hunts. II. Origin and Stratigraphy of Deposits in Southern Fenland.” Philosophical Transactions, Royal Society of London, Series B, Vol. 229, pp. 323–406.Google Scholar

HUNTINGTON, E. 1913. “The Shifting of Climatic Zones as Illustrated in Mexico.” Bulletin of the American Geographical Society, Vol. 45, pp. 1–12, 107-116.Google Scholar

JAEGER, F. 1926. Forschungen über das Diluviale Klima in Mexiko. Petermann's Mitteilungen aus Justus Perthes’ Geographischer Anstalt, Erg änzungsheft No. 190, pp. 1–64.Google Scholar

JOHNSON, F., et al. 1942. The Boylslon Street Fishweir. Papers of the Robert S. Peabody Foundation for Archaeology, Andover, Massachusetts, Vol. 2.Google Scholar

KNOX, A. S. 1942. “The Use of Bromoform in the Separation of Non-Calcareous Microfossils.” Science, n.s., Vol. 95, pp. 307–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

LAFRENTZ, K. 1930. “Untersuchungen tiber die Lebensgeschichte mexikanischer Ambystoma-Arten.” Abhandlungen und Berichte, Museum fur Natur-und Heimatkunde und der Naturwissenschaftlicher Verein in Magdeburg, Vol. 6, pp. 91–127.Google Scholar

LEON, N. 1904-1906. Los Tarascos. Imp. del Museo Nacional de Mexico, 3 Vols.Google Scholar

LEON, N. 1934. “Los Indios Tarascos del Lago de Patzcuaro.” Anales del Museo Nacional de Arqueologia, Historia y Etnografia, 5a época, Vol. 1, p. 149.Google Scholar

MEEK, S. E. 1904. The Freshwater Fishes of Mexico, North of the Isthmus of Tehuantepec. Publications of the Field Columbian Museum, Zoological Series, Vol. 5.Google Scholar

NOGUERA, E. 1931. “Exploraciones Arqueol6gicas en las Regiones de Zamora y Patzcuaro, Estado de Michoacan.” Anales de la Museo Nacional de Arqueologia, Historia y Etnografia, 4a época, Vol. 7, pp. 89–103.Google Scholar

NOGUERA, E. 1935. “Antecedentes y Relaciones de la Cultura Teotihuacana.” El Mixico Antiguo, Vol. 3, Nos. 5-8, pp. 1–81.Google Scholar

POLLOCK, H. E. D. 1936. Round Structures of Aboriginal Middle America. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Publication 471.Google Scholar

REICHE, K. 1922. “Die Vegetationsverhaltnisse in der Umgebung der Hauptstadt von Mexiko.” Botanische Jahrbiicher, Vol. 58, Beiblatt 129.Google Scholar

SEARS, P. B. 1932. “The Archaeology of Environment in Eastern North America.” American Anthropologist, n.s., Vol. 34, pp. 610–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

SEARS, P. B. 1935a. “Glacial and Postglacial Vegetation.” Botanical Review, Vol. 1, pp. 37–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

SEARS, P. B. 1935b. “Types of North American Pollen Profiles.” Ecology, Vol. 16, pp. 488–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

SEARS, P. B. 1937. “Pollen Analysis as an Aid in Dating Cultural Deposits in the United States.” In Early Man, pp. 61–66. Philadelphia.Google Scholar

SEARS, P. B., and COUCH, G. C. 1932. “Microfossils in an Arkansas Peat and Their Significance.” Ohio Journal of Science, Vol. 32, pp. 63–68.Google Scholar

VAILLANT, G. C. 1930. Excavations at Zacatenco. Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History, Vol. 32, Part 1.Google Scholar

VAILLANT, G. C. 1931. Excavations at Ticoman. Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History, Vol. 32, Part 2.Google Scholar

VAILLANT, G. C. 1935a. Early Cultures of the Valley of Mexico: Results of the Stratigraphical Project of the American Museum of Natural History in the Valley of Mexico, 1928-1933. Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History, Vol. 35, Part 3.Google Scholar

VAILLANT, G. C. 1935b. Excavations at El Arbolillo. Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History, Vol. 35, Part 2.Google Scholar

VAILLANT, G. C. 1938. “A Correlation of Archaeological and Historical Sequences in the Valley of Mexico.” American Anthropologist, n.s., Vol. 40, pp. 535–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

VAILLANT, G. C. 1940. “Patterns in Middle American Archaeology.” In The Maya and Their Neighbors, pp. 295–305. New York.Google Scholar

VAILLANT, S. B., and VAILLANT, G. C. 1934. Excavations at Gualupita. Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History, Vol. 35, Part 1.Google Scholar

VILLARELLO, J. DE 1909. “Hidrología Subterranea de los Alredadores de Pátzcuaro, Estado de Michoacán.” Parergones, Institute de Geología, México, No. 9, pp. 339-362.Google Scholar

WILSON, I. T. 1941. “A New Device for Sampling Lake Sediments.” Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, Vol. 11, pp. 73–79.Google Scholar