Ethnicity in Phonological Variation and Change | Language | Cambridge Core (original) (raw)
Extract
In the Boston dialect, the variable or as in short, forty, has two phonetic variants: dialectal [Də], and more standard [Oə]. Speakers of three ethnic groups—Irish, Italian, and Jewish—showed systematic differences in stylistic and diachronic use of the variants, and in subjective evaluation of them. The observed differences are consistent with a three-stage model of variation and change based on ethnicity and, secondarily, on education. However, an additional factor of ‘cultural force’ is required to explain why the model may operate at different rates. The model has implications for the acquisition of dialectal vs. standard variants, and lends support to the view that the ‘family’ provides a stronger influence than the ‘peer group’ in the development of phonological systems.
References
Bailey, Charles-James N. 1973. Variation and linguistic theory. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Fisher, John L. 1958. Social influences in the choice of a linguistic variant. Word 14. 47–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Isaac. 1929. A Boston boyhood. American Mercury, Vol. 17, No. 67. [Reprinted in The many voices of Boston, ed. by Howard M. Jones & Bessie Z. Jones, 345–55. Boston: Little, Brown, 1975.]Google Scholar
Haas, Mary. 1944. Men's and women's speech in Koasati. Lg. 20. 142–9.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1966. The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1972. Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Thernstrom, Stephan. 1973. The other Bostonians: poverty and progress in the American metropolis, 1880–1970. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, Peter J. 1974. The social differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walter A. 1969. A sociolinguistic description of Detroit Negro speech. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar