Individual differences in working memory capacity and enumeration (original) (raw)

References

• Baddeley, A. D. (1986).Working memory. New York: Oxford University Press.
  Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. D., &Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 47–90). New York: Academic Press.
  Google Scholar
• Cantor, J., &Engle, R. W. (1993). Working memory capacity as longterm memory activation: An individual differences approach.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,5, 1101–1114.
  Article Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H., &Klahr, D. (1975). Span and rate of apprehension in children and adults.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,19, 434–439.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Conway, A. R. A., Cowan, N., Bunting, M. F., Therriault, D., & Minkoff, S. (2000).A latent variable analysis of working memory capacity, short term memory capacity, processing speed, and general fluid intelligence. Manuscript submitted for publication.
• Conway, A. R. A., &Engle, R. W. (1994). Working memory and retrieval: A resource-dependent inhibition model.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,123, 354–373.
  Article Google Scholar
• Conway, A. R. A., Tuholski, S. W., Shisler, R. J., &Engle, R. W. (1999). The effect of memory load on negative priming: An individual differences investigation.Memory & Cognition,27, 1042–1050.
  Google Scholar
• Cowan, N. (1988). Evolving conceptions of memory storage, selective attention, and their mutual constraints within the human information processing system.Psychological Bulletin,104, 163–191.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Cowan, N. (1995).Attention and memory: An integrated framework. New York: Oxford University Press.
  Google Scholar
• Daneman, M., &Carpenter, P. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,19, 450–466.
  Article Google Scholar
• Engle, R. W., Kane, M., &Tuholski, S. W. (1999). Individual differences in working memory capacity and what they tell us about controlled attention, general fluid intelligence, and functions of the prefrontal cortex. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.),Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 102–134), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  Google Scholar
• Engle, R. W., Tuholski, S. W., Laughlin, J. E., &Conway, A. R.A. (1999). Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: A latent-variable approach.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,128, 309–331.
  Article Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A., &Dulaney, P. F. (1999). Long-term working memory as an alternative to capacity models of working memory in everyday skilled performance. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.),Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 257–297). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A., &Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-term working memory.Psychological Review,102, 211–245.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Jevons, W. (1871). The power of numerical discrimination.Nature,3, 281–282.
  Article Google Scholar
• Kane, M. J., &Engle, R. W. (2000). Working memory capacity, proactive interference, and divided attention: Limits on long-term memory retrieval.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 336–358.
  Article Google Scholar
• King, J., &Just, M. A. (1991). Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory.Journal of Memory & Language,30, 580–602.
  Article Google Scholar
• Kyllonen, P. C., &Chrystal, R. E. (1990). Reasoning ability is (little more than) working memory capacity?Intelligence,14, 389–433.
  Article Google Scholar
• MacDonald, M. C., Just, M. A., &Carpenter, P. A. (1992). Working memory constraints on the processing of syntactic ambiguity.Cognitive Psychology,24, 56–98.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Miyake, A., &Shah, P. (Eds.) (1999).Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and control. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  Google Scholar
• Pylyshyn, Z. (1994). Some primitive mechanisms of spatial attention.Cognition,50, 363–384.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Rosen, V. M., &Engle, R. W. (1997). The role of working memory capacity in retrieval.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,126, 211–227.
  Article Google Scholar
• Rosen, V. M., &Engle, R. W. (1998). Working memory capacity and suppression.Journal of Memory & Language,39, 418–436.
  Article Google Scholar
• Treisman, A. [M.] (1986). Properties, parts, and objects. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.),Handbook of perception and human performance: Vol. 2. Cognitive processes & performance (pp. 1–70). New York: Wiley.
  Google Scholar
• Treisman, A. M., &Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention.Cognitive Psychology,12, 97–136.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Treisman, A. [M.], &Gormican, S. (1988). Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries.Psychological Review,95, 15–48.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Treisman, A. [M.], &Sato, S. (1990). Conjunction search revisited.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 459–478.
  Article Google Scholar
• Trick, L. M. &Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1993). What enumeration studies can show us about spatial attention: Evidence for limited capacity preat tentive processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,19, 331–351.
  Article Google Scholar
• Trick, L. M., &Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1994). Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision.Psychological Review,101, 80–102.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Turner, M. L., &Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent?Journal of Memory & Language,28, 127–154.
  Article Google Scholar
• Verhaeghen, P., &Salthouse, T. A. (1998). Meta-analysis of age-cognition relations in adulthood: Estimates of linear and nonlinear age effects.Psychological Bulletin,122, 231–249.
  Article Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M., Cave, K. R., &Franzel, S. L. (1989). Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 419–433.
  Article Google Scholar

Download references