What a speaker’s choice of frame reveals: Reference points, frame selection, and framing effects (original) (raw)

References

• Fischhoff, B. (1983). Predicting frames.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,9, 103–116.
  Article Google Scholar
• Frisch, D. (1993). Reasons for framing effects.Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes,54, 399–429.
  Article Google Scholar
• Hilton, D. J. (1995). The social context of reasoning: Conversational inference and rational judgment.Psychological Bulletin,118, 248–271.
  Article Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., &Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk.Econometrica,47, 263–291.
  Article Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., &Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values, and frames.American Psychologist,39, 341–350.
  Article Google Scholar
• Kühberger, A. (1998). The influence of framing on risky decisions: A meta-analysis.Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes,75, 23–55.
  Article Google Scholar
• Levin, I. P., &Gaeth, G. J. (1988). How consumers are affected by the framing of attribute information before and after consuming the product.Journal of Consumer Research,15, 374–378.
  Article Google Scholar
• Levin, I. P., Schneider, S. L., &Gaeth, G. J. (1998). All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects.Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes,76, 149–188.
  Article Google Scholar
• Levin, I. P., Schnittjer, S. K., &Thee, S. L. (1988). Information framing effects in social and personal decisions.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,24, 520–529.
  Article Google Scholar
• Marteau, T. M. (1989). Framing of information: Its influence upon decisions of doctors and patients.British Journal of Social Psychology,28, 89–94.
  PubMed Google Scholar
• McKenzie, C. R. M., Ferreira, V. S., Mikkelsen, L. A., McDermott, K. J., &Skrable, R. P. (2001). Do conditional hypotheses target rare events?Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes,85, 291–309.
  Article Google Scholar
• McKenzie, C. R. M., &Mikkelsen, L. A. (2000). The psychological side of Hempel’s paradox of confirmation.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,7, 360–366.
  Google Scholar
• McKenzie, C. R. M., & Mikkelsen, L. A. (in press). A Bayesian view of covariation assessment.Cognitive Psychology.
• McNeil, B. J., Pauker, S. G., Sox, H. C., Jr., &Tversky, A. (1982). On the elicitation of preferences for alternative therapies.New England Journal of Medicine,306, 1259–1262.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Meyerowitz, B. E., &Chaiken, S. (1987). The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions, and behavior.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,52, 500–510.
  Article Google Scholar
• Moxey, L. M., &Sanford, A. J. (2000). Communicating quantities: A review of psycholinguistic evidence of how expressions determine perspectives.Applied Cognitive Psychology,14, 237–255.
  Article Google Scholar
• Sanford, A. J., Fay, N., Stewart, A., &Moxey, L. (2002). Perspective in statements of quantity, with implications for consumer psychology.Psychological Science,13, 130–134.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Schneider, S. L. (1992). Framing and conflict: Aspiration level contingency, the status quo, and current theories of risky choice.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 1040–1057.
  Article Google Scholar
• Schwarz, N. (1996).Cognition and communication: Judgmental biases, research methods, and the logic of conversation. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  Google Scholar
• Thaler, R. (1980). Toward a positive theory of consumer choice.Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization,1, 9–60.
  Article Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., &Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice.Science,211, 453–458.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., &Kahneman, D. (1986). Rational choice and the framing of decisions.Journal of Business,59, S251-S278.
  Article Google Scholar
• Wilson, D. K., Kaplan, R. M., &Schneiderman, L. J. (1987). Framing of decisions and selections of alternatives in health care.Social Behaviour,2, 51–59.
  Google Scholar

Download references