Framing effects in inference tasks—and why they are normatively defensible (original) (raw)

References

• Allan.L. G. (1980). A note on measurement of contingency between two binary variables in judgment tasks.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,15, 147–149.
  Google Scholar
• Allan, L. G. (1993). Human contingency judgments: Rule based or associative?Psychological Bulletin,114, 325–448.
  Article Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. R. (1990).The adaptive character of thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. R., &Sheu, C.-F. (1995). Causal inferences as perceptual judgments.Memory & Cognition,23, 510–524.
  Google Scholar
• Arkes, H. R., &Harkness, A. R. (1983). Estimates of contingency between two dichotomous variables.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,112, 117–135.
  Article Google Scholar
• Cheng, P. W. (1997). From covariation to causation: A causal power theory.Psychological Review,104, 367–405.
  Article Google Scholar
• Cheng, P. W., &Novick, L. R. (1990). A probabilistic contrast model of causal induction.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,58, 545–567.
  Article Google Scholar
• Cheng, P.W., &Novick, L. R. (1992). Covariation in natural causal induction.Psychological Review,99, 365–382.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Crocker, J. (1981). Judgment of covariation by social perceivers.Psychological Bulletin,90, 272–292.
  Article Google Scholar
• Crocker, J. (1982). Biased questions in judgment of covariation studies.Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin,8, 214–220.
  Article Google Scholar
• Einhorn, H. J., &Hogarth, R. M. (1986). Judging probable cause.Psychological Bulletin,99, 3–19.
  Article Google Scholar
• Evans, J. St. B. T. (1989).Bias in human reasoning: Causes and consequences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  Google Scholar
• Fischhoff, B., &Beyth-Marom, R. (1983). Hypothesis testing from a Bayesian perspective.Psychological Review,90, 239–260.
  Article Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G. (1991). How to make cognitive illusions disappear: Beyond “heuristics and biases.”European Review of Social Psychology,2, 83–115.
  Article Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G., Hoffrage, U., &Kleinbölting, H. (1991). Probabilistic mental models: A Brunswikian theory of confidence.Psychological Review,98, 506–528.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Hilgard, E. R., &Bower, G. H. (1975).Theories of learning (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  Google Scholar
• Hilton, D. J. (1995). The social context of reasoning: Conversational inference and rational judgment.Psychological Bulletin,118, 248–271.
  Article Google Scholar
• Holland, J. H., Holyoak, K. J., Nisbett, R. E., &Thagard, P. R. (1986).Induction: Processes of inference, learning, and discovery. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  Google Scholar
• Horwich, P. (1982).Probability and evidence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  Google Scholar
• Inhelder, B., &Piaget, J. (1958).The growth of logical thinking: From childhood to adolescence. New York: Basic Books.
  Book Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H. M., & Ward, W. C. (1965). Judgment of contingency between responses and outcomes.Psychological Monographs: General & Applied,79(1, Whole No. 594).
• Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1968a). The choice of the passive voice in a communicative task.British Journal of Psychology,59, 7–15.
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1968b). The interpretation of the passive voice.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,20, 69–73.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., &Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk.Econometrica,47, 263–291.
  Article Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., &Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values, and frames.American Psychologist,39, 341–350.
  Article Google Scholar
• Kao, S.-F., &Wasserman, E. A. (1993). Assessment of an information integration account of contingency judgment with examination of subjective cell importance and method of information presentation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 1363–1386.
  Article Google Scholar
• Klayman, J. (1995). Varieties of confirmation bias. In D. L. Medin (Series Ed.) & J. Busemeyer & R. Hastie (Vol. Eds.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 32, pp. 385–418). San Diego: Academic Press.
  Google Scholar
• Klayman, J., &Ha, Y.-W. (1987). Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing.Psychological Review,94, 211–228.
  Article Google Scholar
• Kotovsky, K., Hayes, J. R., &Simon, H. A. (1985). Why are some problems hard? Evidence from Tower of Hanoi.Cognitive Psychology,17, 248–294.
  Article Google Scholar
• Kühberger, A. (1998). The influence of framing on risky decisions: A meta-analysis.Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes,75, 23–55.
  Article Google Scholar
• Levin, I. P., &Gaeth, G. J. (1988). How consumers are affected by the framing of attribute information before and after consuming the product.Journal of Consumer Research,15, 374–378.
  Article Google Scholar
• Levin, I. P., Schneider, S. L., &Gaeth, G. J. (1998). All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects.Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes,76, 149–188.
  Article Google Scholar
• Levin, I. P., Schnittjer, S. K., &Thee, S. L. (1988). Information framing effects in social and personal decisions.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,24, 520–529.
  Article Google Scholar
• Levin, I. P., Wasserman, E. A., &Kao, S.-F. (1993). Multiple methods for examining biased information use in contingency judgments.Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes,55, 228–250.
  Article Google Scholar
• Lipe, M. G. (1990). A lens-model analysis of covariation research.Journal of Behavioral Decision Making,3, 47–59.
  Google Scholar
• Mackie, J. L. (1963). The paradox of confirmation.British Journal for the Philosophy of Science,13, 265–277.
  Article Google Scholar
• Mackie, J. L. (1974).The cement of the universe: A study of causation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press.
  Google Scholar
• Mandel, D. R., &Lehman, D. R. (1998). Integration of contingency information in judgments of cause, covariation, and probability.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,127, 269–285.
  Article Google Scholar
• Marteau, T. M. (1989). Framing of information: Its influence upon decisions of doctors and patients.British Journal of Social Psychology,28, 89–94.
  PubMed Google Scholar
• McKenzie, C. R. M. (1994). The accuracy of intuitive judgment strategies: Covariation assessment and Bayesian inference.Cognitive Psychology,26, 209–239.
  Article Google Scholar
• McKenzie, C. R. M. (1998). Taking into account the strength of an alternative hypothesis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 771–792.
  Article Google Scholar
• McKenzie, C. R. M. (1999). (Non)complementary updating of belief in two hypotheses.Memory & Cognition,27, 152–165.
  Google Scholar
• McKenzie, C. R. M. (2004). Hypothesis testing and evaluation. In D. J. Koehler & N. Harvey (Eds.),Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making (pp. 200–219). Oxford: Blackwell.
  Chapter Google Scholar
• McKenzie, C. R. M., &Amin, M. B. (2002). When wrong predictions provide more support than right ones.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,9, 821–828.
  Google Scholar
• McKenzie, C. R. M., Ferreira, V. S., Mikkelsen, L. A., McDermott, K. J., &Skrable, R. P. (2001). Do conditional hypotheses target rare events?Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes,85, 291–309.
  Article Google Scholar
• McKenzie, C. R. M., &Mikkelsen, L. A. (2000). The psychological side of Hempel’s paradox of confirmation.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,7, 360–366.
  Google Scholar
• McKenzie, C. R. M., & Mikkelsen, L. A. (in press). A Bayesian view of covariation assessment.Cognitive Psychology.
• McKenzie, C. R. M., &Nelson, J. D. (2003). What a speaker’s choice of frame reveals: Reference points, frame selection, and framing effects.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,10, 596–602.
  Google Scholar
• McKenzie, C. R. M., Wixted, J. T., Noelle, D. C., &Gyurjyan, G. (2001). Relation between confidence in yes-no and forced-choice tasks.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,130, 140–155.
  Article Google Scholar
• Meyerowitz, B. E., &Chaiken, S. (1987). The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions, and behavior.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,52, 500–510.
  Article Google Scholar
• Moxey, L. M., &Sanford, A. J. (2000). Communicating quantities: A review of psycholinguistic evidence of how expressions determine perspectives.Applied Cognitive Psychology,14, 237–255.
  Article Google Scholar
• Mynatt, C. R., Doherty, M. E., &Tweney, R. D. (1977). Confirmation bias in a simulated research environment: An experimental study of scientific inference.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,29, 85–95.
  Article Google Scholar
• Nickerson, R. S. (1996). Hempel’s paradox and Wason’s selection task: Logical and psychological puzzles of confirmation.Thinking & Reasoning,2, 1–31.
  Article Google Scholar
• Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises.Review of General Psychology,2, 175–220.
  Article Google Scholar
• Oaksford, M., &Chater, N. (1994). A rational analysis of the selection task as optimal data selection.Psychological Review,101, 608–631.
  Article Google Scholar
• Oaksford, M., &Chater, N. (1996). Rational explanation of the selection task.Psychological Review,103, 381–391.
  Article Google Scholar
• Oaksford, M., &Chater, N. (2003). Optimal data selection: Revision, review, and re-evaluation.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,10, 289–318.
  Google Scholar
• Oaksford, M., Chater, N., &Grainger, B. (1999). Probabilistic effects in data selection.Thinking & Reasoning,5, 193–243.
  Article Google Scholar
• Oaksford, M., Chater, N., Grainger, B., &Larkin, J. (1997). Optimal data selection in the reduced array selection task (RAST).Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 441–458.
  Article Google Scholar
• Sanford, A. J., Fay, N., Stewart, A., &Moxey, L. (2002). Perspective in statements of quantity, with implications for consumer psychology.Psychological Science,13, 130–134.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Schustack, M.W., &Sternberg, R. J. (1981). Evaluation of evidence in causal inference.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,110, 101–120.
  Article Google Scholar
• Schwarz, N. (1996).Cognition and communication: Judgmental biases, research methods, and the logic of conversation. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  Google Scholar
• Shaklee, H., &Tucker, D. (1980). A rule analysis of judgments of covariation between events.Memory & Cognition,8, 459–467.
  Google Scholar
• Sher, S., & McKenzie, C. R. M. (2004).Information leakage from logically equivalent frames. Manuscript submitted for publication.
• Smedslund, J. (1963). The concept of correlation in adults.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,4, 165–173.
  Article Google Scholar
• Smith, E. E., &Medin, D. L. (1981).Categories and concepts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  Google Scholar
• Snyder, M. (1981). Seek and ye shall find: Testing hypotheses about other people. In E. T. Higgins, C. P. Heiman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.),Social cognition: The Ontario symposium on personality and social psychology (pp. 277–303). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  Google Scholar
• Snyder, M., &Swann, W. B., Jr. (1978). Hypothesis testing in social interaction.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,36, 1202–1212.
  Article Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., &Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice.Science,211, 453–458.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., &Kahneman, D. (1986). Rational choice and the framing of decisions.Journal of Business,59, S251-S278.
  Article Google Scholar
• Ward, W. C., &Jenkins, H. M. (1965). The display of information and the judgment of contingency.Canadian Journal of Psychology,19, 231–241.
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Wason, P. C. (1960). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,12, 129–140.
  Article Google Scholar
• Wasserman, E. A., Dorner, W.W., &Kao, S.-F. (1990). Contributions of specific cell information to judgments of interevent contingency.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 509–521.
  Article Google Scholar
• Wilson, D. K., Kaplan, R. M., &Schneiderman, L. J. (1987). Framing of decisions and selections of alternatives in health care.Social Behaviour,2, 51–59.
  Google Scholar

Download references