Analogy use in naturalistic settings: The influence of audience, emotion, and goals (original) (raw)

References

• Blanchette, I., &Dunbar, K. (2000). How analogies are generated: The roles of structural and superficial similarity.Memory & Cognition,28, 108–124.
  Google Scholar
• Clement, C. A., Mawby, R., &Giles, D. E. (1994). The effects of manifest relational similarity on analog retrieval.Journal of Memory & Language,33, 396–420.
  Article Google Scholar
• Dunbar, K. (1995). How scientists really reason: Scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.),The nature of insight (pp. 365–395). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  Google Scholar
• Dunbar, K. (1997). How scientists think: Online creativity and conceptual change in science. In T. B. Ward, S. M. Smith, & S. Vaid (Eds.),Conceptual structures and processes: Emergence, discovery and change (pp. 461–493). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  Google Scholar
• Edwards, R., &Clevenger, T. (1990). The effect of schematic and affective processes on metaphorical invention.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,19, 91–102.
  Article Google Scholar
• Ericsson, A., &J. Smith (1991).Toward a general theory of expertise: Prospects and limits. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  Google Scholar
• Forbus, K. D., Gentner, D., &Law, K. (1994). MAC/FAC: A model of similarity-based retrieval.Cognitive Science,19, 141–205.
  Article Google Scholar
• Gentner, D., &Markman, A. B. (1997). Structure mapping in analogy and similarity.American Psychologist,52, 45–56.
  Article Google Scholar
• Gentner, D., Rattermann, M. J., &Forbus, K. (1993). The roles of similarity in transfer: Separating retrievability from inferential soundness.Cognitive Psychology,25, 524–575.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Gick, M. L., &Holyoak, K. J. (1980). Analogical problem solving.Cognitive Psychology,12, 306–355.
  Article Google Scholar
• Gilovich, T. (1981). Seeing the past in the present: The effect of associations to familiar events on judgments and decisions.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,40, 797–808.
  Article Google Scholar
• Glaser, J., &Salovey, P. (1998). Affect in electoral politics.Personality & Social Psychology Review,2, 156–172.
  Article Google Scholar
• Holyoak, K. J., &Thagard, P. (1995).Mental leaps: Analogy in creative thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  Google Scholar
• Holyoak, K. J., &Thagard, P. (1997). The analogical mind.American Psychologist,52, 35–44.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Hummel, J. E., &Holyoak, K. J. (1997). Distributed representations of structure: A theory of analogical access and mapping.Psychological Review,104, 427–466.
  Article Google Scholar
• Keane, M. (1987). On retrieving analogues when solving problems.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,39, 29–41.
  Google Scholar
• Khong, Y. F. (1992).Analogies at war: Korea, Munich, Dien Bien Phu, and the Vietnam decisions of 1965. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  Google Scholar
• Kristiansen, C.M., &Zanna, M. P. (1994). The rhetorical use of values to justify social and intergroup attitudes.Journal of Social Issues,50, 47–65.
  Article Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G. (1991).Metaphor in politics: An open letter to the Internet from George Lakoff. Available: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/∼rohrer/ lakoff-1.htm
• Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.),Metaphor and thought (2nd ed., pp. 202–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., &Johnson, M. (1987). The metaphorical logic of rape.Metaphor & Symbolic Activity,2, 73–79.
  Article Google Scholar
• Novick, L. R. (1988). Analogical transfer, problem similarity, and expertise.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,14, 510–520.
  Article Google Scholar
• Rohrer, T. (1991). To plow the sea: Metaphors for regional peace in Latin America.Metaphor & Symbolic Activity,6, 163–181.
  Article Google Scholar
• Rohrer, T. (1995). The metaphorical logic of (political) rape: George Bush and the new world order.Metaphor & Symbolic Activity,10, 113–131.
  Article Google Scholar
• Ross, B.H. (1989). Distinguishing types of superficial similarities: Different effects on the access and use of earlier problems.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 456–468.
  Article Google Scholar
• Shimko, K. L. (1994). Metaphors and foreign policy decision making.Political Psychology,15, 655–671.
  Article Google Scholar
• Spellman, B. A., &Holyoak, K. J. (1993). An inhibitory mechanism for goal-directed analogical mapping. In R. Ashwin & K. Eiselt (Eds.),Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 947–952). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  Google Scholar
• Spellman, B. A., &Holyoak, K. J. (1996). Pragmatics in analogical mapping.Cognitive Psychology,31, 307–346.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Thagard, P., & Shelley, C. P. (in press). Emotional analogies and analogical inference. In D. Gentner, K. H. Holyoak, & B. Kokinov (Eds.),Analogy: Interdisciplinary perspectives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Vosniadou, S., &Ortony, A. (1989).Similarity and analogical reasoning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  Book Google Scholar
• Voss, J. F., Kennet, J., Wiley, J., &Schooler, T. Y. (1992). Experts at debate: The use of metaphor in the U.S. Senate debate on the Gulf Crisis.Metaphor & Symbolic Activity,7, 197–214.
  Article Google Scholar
• Wharton, C. M., Holyoak, K. J., Downing, P. E., &Lange, T. E. (1994). Below the surface: Analogical similarity and retrieval competition in reminding.Cognitive Psychology,26, 64–101.
  Article Google Scholar

Download references