A method for sensation scaling based on an analogy between perception and judgment (original) (raw)
References
Bonnet, C. La vitesse percue et Ia relation V = E/T.Année psychol., 1964, 64, 47–60. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Brown, J. F. Visual perception of velocity.Psychol. Forsch., 1931a, 14, 199–232. Article Google Scholar
Brown, J. F. On time perception in visual movement fields.Psychol, Forsch., 1931b, 14, 233–248. Article Google Scholar
Eisler, H. Similarity in the continuum of heaviness with some methodological and theoretical considerations.Seand. J. Psychol., 1960, 1, 69–81 Article Google Scholar
Eisler, H. On psychophysics in general and the general psychophysical differential equation in particular.Scand. J. Psychol., 1965, 6, 85–102. Article Google Scholar
Eisler, H., &Ekman.G. A mechanism of subjective similarity.Acta psychol., Amsterdam. 1959, 16, 1–10. Article Google Scholar
Ekman, G. Methodological note on scales of gustatory intensity.Scand, J. Psychol., 1961, 2, 185–190. Article Google Scholar
Ekman, G., Engen, T., Künnapas, T., &Lindman, R. A quantitative principle of qualitative similarity.J. exp. Psychol., 1964, 68, 530–536. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Ekman, G., Goude, G., &Waem, Y. Subjective similarity in two perceptual continua.J. exp. Psychol., 1961, 61, 222–227. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Engen, T., &Levy, N. The influence of standards on psychophysical judgment.Percept. mot. Skills, 1955, 5, 193–197. Article Google Scholar
Goude, G.On fundamental measurement in psychology. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, 1962. Google Scholar
Guilford, G.Psychometric methods. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1954. Google Scholar
Gulliksen, H. Mathematical solutions for psychological problems.Amer. Scientist. 1959, 47, 178–201. Google Scholar
Livingstone.R. Central control of receptors and sensory transmission systems. In J. Field, H. Magoun, & W. Hall (Eds.),Handbook of physiology. Section I: Neurophysiology. Vol. 1. Washington, D. C.: American Physiological Society, 1959. Google Scholar
Mashhour, M.Psychophysical relations in the perception of velocity. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, 1964. Google Scholar
Rachlin, H. C. Scaling subjective velocity. distance, and duration.Percept: & Psychophys., 1966, 1, 77–82. Google Scholar
Sjöberg, L. On ratio estimation. Report Psychological Laboratory, University of Stockholm, No. 191, 1965.
Sjöberg, L. Unidimensional similarity revisited.Scand. J. Psychol., 1966a, 7, in press.
Sjöberg, L. A comparative study of three direct psychophysical scaling methods. Unpublished manuscript, 1966b.
Stevens, S. S. The direct estimation of sensory magnitudes-loudness.Amer. J. Psychol., 1956, 69, 1–25. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Stevens, S. S. Cross-modality validation of subjective scales for loudness, vibration, and electric shock.J. exp. Psychol., 1959, 57, 201–209. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Stevens, S. S. The surprising simplicity of sensory metrics.Amer Psychologist. 1962, 17, 29–39. Article Google Scholar
Stevens, S. S. Matching functions between loudness and ten other continua.Percept. & Psychophys., 1966, 1, 5–8. Google Scholar
Stevens, S. S., &Galanter, E. H. Ratio scales and category scales for a dozen perceptual continua.J. exp. Psychol., 1957, 54, 377–411. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar