Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis: Background, Indications, Contraindications (original) (raw)

Background

The ileal pouch–anal anastomosis (IPAA) is a surgical procedure that is used to restore gastrointestinal continuity after surgical removal of the colon and rectum. [1] Various conditions, including inflammatory states, cancer, or infection, may necessitate the complete surgical removal of the colon and rectum.

Also called a J pouch or an internal pouch, the procedure involves the creation of a pouch of small intestine to recreate the removed rectum. Two or more loops of intestine are sutured or stapled together to form a reservoir for stool. This reservoir is then attached to the anus for reestablishment of anal fecal flow. The IPAA is often protected by temporarily diverting the path of stool through the abdominal wall in the form of an upstream ileostomy. After a period of recovery, this ileostomy is reversed during a separate procedure.

eMedicine Logo

Indications

The IPAA procedure is performed after the colon and rectum have been completely removed. Removal of the colon and rectum is termed proctocolectomy. When an IPAA follows, the procedure is called a restorative proctocolectomy. [2] Indications for restorative proctocolectomy include the following [3] :

eMedicine Logo

Contraindications

Creation of a J pouch is contraindicated when the small bowel is involved in the disease process. Such involvement is most common when proctocolectomy is performed for Crohn disease, because the distal ileum is often affected. IPAA is also contraindicated when the distal rectum or anal canal is diseased, as with Crohn disease or rectal cancer.

Concerns have been expressed about the safety of IPAA in older patients. A systematic review by Ramage et al found that the procedure was safe in this population, provided that the increased risk of dehydration and electrolyte loss was kept in mind. [4] Older IPAA patients appeared to have worse postoperative function, but this impaired function seemed to level out over time, and there appeared to be no significant impact on overall quality of life and patient satisfaction.

eMedicine Logo

Technical Considerations

Complication prevention

Several standardized practices are followed to decrease the incidence of perioperative complications. Antibiotics are given within 1 hour of surgery to lower the rate of wound infection. Compression devices are placed on the legs to decrease the likelihood of blood clot formation. Patients are typically asked to stop taking any antiplatelet agents (eg, aspirin or clopidogrel) 1 week prior to surgery. This reduces bleeding complications.

Finally, before starting the surgical procedure, the surgeons, operating room staff, and anesthesia team should verify the correct patient and procedure in order to prevent errors.

eMedicine Logo

Outcomes

In a systematic review with meta-analysis and metaregression (11 studies; N = 6770), Pellino et al evaluated the outcome of IPAA for Crohn disease (n = 352) against that for ulcerative colitis (n = 6418). [5] They found that patients with Crohn disease had a fivefold higher risk of failure and a twofold higher risk of strictures after IPAA than patients with ulcerative colitis. Function in Crohn patients who retained the pouch was similar to that in ulcerative colitis patients. Crohn disease did not increase the risk of pouchitis. The authors concluded that IPAA could be offered to selected Crohn patients after appropriate preoperative counseling.

In a systematic review and meta-analysis (six retrospective studies; N = 3460), Emile et al compared IPAA outcome of IPAA in patients with obesity and patients with ideal weight. [6] They found that obese patients who underwent IPAA were more likely to have open (rather than laparoscopic) procedures; a longer operating time; greater blood loss; higher rates of complications, anastomotic leakage, and incisional hernia; and longer hospital stays.

eMedicine Logo

  1. Ng KS, Gonsalves SJ, Sagar PM. Ileal-anal pouches: A review of its history, indications, and complications. World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Aug 21. 25 (31):4320-4342. [QxMD MEDLINE Link]. [Full Text].
  2. Remzi FH, Lavryk OA, Ashburn JH, Hull TL, Lavery IC, Dietz DW, et al. Restorative proctocolectomy: an example of how surgery evolves in response to paradigm shifts in care. Colorectal Dis. 2017 Nov. 19 (11):1003-1012. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  3. Tajika M, Niwa Y, Bhatia V, Tanaka T, Ishihara M, Yamao K. Risk of ileal pouch neoplasms in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Oct 28. 19 (40):6774-83. [QxMD MEDLINE Link]. [Full Text].
  4. Ramage L, Qiu S, Georgiou P, Tekkis P, Tan E. Functional outcomes following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) in older patients: a systematic review. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016 Mar. 31 (3):481-92. [QxMD MEDLINE Link]. [Full Text].
  5. Pellino G, Vinci D, Signoriello G, Kontovounisios C, Canonico S, Selvaggi F, et al. Long-Term Bowel Function and Fate of the Ileal Pouch After Restorative Proctocolectomy in Patients With Crohn's Disease: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis and Metaregression. J Crohns Colitis. 2020 Mar 13. 14 (3):418-427. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  6. Emile SH, Khan SM, Wexner SD. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the outcome of ileal pouch anal anastomosis in patients with obesity. Surgery. 2021 Dec. 170 (6):1629-1636. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  7. Um JW, M'Koma AE. Pouch-related dysplasia and adenocarcinoma following restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis. Tech Coloproctol. 2011 Mar. 15 (1):7-16. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  8. Ianco O, Tulchinsky H, Lusthaus M, Ofer A, Santo E, Vaisman N, et al. Diet of patients after pouch surgery may affect pouch inflammation. World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Oct 14. 19 (38):6458-64. [QxMD MEDLINE Link]. [Full Text].
  9. Klos CL, Safar B, Jamal N, Hunt SR, Wise PE, Birnbaum EH, et al. Obesity increases risk for pouch-related complications following restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). J Gastrointest Surg. 2014 Mar. 18 (3):573-9. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  10. Buckman SA, Heise CP. Nutrition considerations surrounding restorative proctocolectomy. Nutr Clin Pract. 2010 Jun. 25 (3):250-6. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  11. Thompson DT, Hrabe JE. Staged Approaches to Restorative Proctocolectomy with Ileoanal Pouch-When and Why?. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2021 Aug. 31 (8):875-880. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  12. Joyce MR, Kiran RP, Remzi FH, Church J, Fazio VW. In a select group of patients meeting strict clinical criteria and undergoing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, the omission of a diverting ileostomy offers cost savings to the hospital. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010 Jun. 53 (6):905-10. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  13. Bislenghi G, Denolf M, Fieuws S, Wolthuis A, D'Hoore A. Functional outcomes of transanal versus transabdominal restorative proctectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in ulcerative colitis-a monocentric retrospective comparative study. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022 Dec. 407 (8):3607-3614. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  14. Vernon J, Ng D, Khan S, Koerber D, Ghuman A, Karimuddin A. Functional outcomes after transanal ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis: narrative review of the current literature. Tech Coloproctol. 2023 Apr 11. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  15. Jani K, Shah A. Laparoscopic total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. J Minim Access Surg. 2015 Jul-Sep. 11 (3):177-83. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  16. Campos FG, Real Martinez CA, Monteiro de Camargo MG, Cesconetto DM, Nahas SC, Cecconello I. Laparoscopic Versus Open Restorative Proctocolectomy for Familial Adenomatous Polyposis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Jan. 28 (1):47-52. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  17. Shimada N, Ohge H, Yano R, Murao N, Shigemoto N, Uegami S, et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2016 Aug 27. 8 (8):578-82. [QxMD MEDLINE Link]. [Full Text].
  18. Morelli L, Guadagni S, Mariniello MD, Furbetta N, Pisano R, D'Isidoro C, et al. Hand-assisted hybrid laparoscopic-robotic total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch--anal anastomosis. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2015 Aug. 400 (6):741-8. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  19. Kirat HT, Remzi FH, Kiran RP, Fazio VW. Comparison of outcomes after hand-sewn versus stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in 3,109 patients. Surgery. 2009 Oct. 146 (4):723-9; discussion 729-30. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  20. Clancy C, Connelly TM, Jia X, Lipman J, Lightner AL, Hull T, et al. Defining the safety of early ileostomy closure after ileal pouch anal anastomosis. Tech Coloproctol. 2023 May 20. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  21. Zhuo C, Trencheva K, Maggiori L, Milsom JW, Sonoda T, Shukla PJ, et al. Experience of a specialist centre in the management of anastomotic sinus following leaks after low rectal or ileal pouch-anal anastomosis with diverting stoma. Colorectal Dis. 2013 Nov. 15 (11):1429-35. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  22. Navaneethan U, Shen B. Diagnosis and management of pouchitis and ileoanal pouch dysfunction. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2010 Dec. 12 (6):485-94. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  23. Huguet M, Pereira B, Goutte M, Goutorbe F, Dubois A, Bommelaer G, et al. Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis: Anti-TNF Therapy in Refractory Pouchitis and Crohn's Disease-Like Complications of the Pouch After Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis Following Colectomy for Ulcerative Colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2018 Jan 18. 24 (2):261-268. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  24. Ollech JE, Rubin DT, Glick L, Weisshof R, El Jurdi K, Israel A, et al. Ustekinumab Is Effective for the Treatment of Chronic Antibiotic-Refractory Pouchitis. Dig Dis Sci. 2019 Dec. 64 (12):3596-3601. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  25. Kato S, Sakakibara Y, Ishihara A, Iwasaki T, Tanaka S, Hasegawa H, et al. [A case of refractory pouchitis following surgery for ulcerative colitis successfully treated with adalimumab]. Nihon Shokakibyo Gakkai Zasshi. 2019. 116 (9):732-738. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  26. Rabbenou W, Chang S. Medical treatment of pouchitis: a guide for the clinician. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2021. 14:17562848211023376. [QxMD MEDLINE Link]. [Full Text].
  27. Nguyen N, Zhang B, Holubar SD, Pardi DS, Singh S. Treatment and prevention of pouchitis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 May 28. 5:CD001176. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  28. Machiels K, Sabino J, Vandermosten L, Joossens M, Arijs I, de Bruyn M, et al. Specific members of the predominant gut microbiota predict pouchitis following colectomy and IPAA in UC. Gut. 2017 Jan. 66 (1):79-88. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  29. McKenna NP, Mathis KL, Khasawneh MA, Dozois EJ, Larson DW, Pemberton JH, et al. Obese Patients Undergoing Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis: Short-and Long-term Surgical Outcomes. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2017 Dec. 23 (12):2142-2146. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  30. Lee KE, Shen B. Endoscopic Therapy for Pouch Leaks and Strictures: A Systematic Review. Dis Colon Rectum. 2022 Dec 1. 65 (S1):S92-S104. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  31. Seifarth C, Slavova N, Degro C, Lehmann KS, Kreis ME, Weixler B. Sacral nerve stimulation in patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021 Sep. 36 (9):1937-1943. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

Author

Coauthor(s)

Andrea C Bafford, MD Assistant Professor, Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Division of General and Oncologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, University of Maryland Medical Center

Andrea C Bafford, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Surgeons, American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Kurt E Roberts, MD Associate Professor, Division of Bariatric and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine; Chair, Department of Surgery, Saint Francis Hospital, Trinity Health of New England Medical Group

Kurt E Roberts, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Surgeons, Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons, Society of Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgeons

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.