User:Kevin Murray - Wikipedia (original) (raw)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I live in the San Francisco Bay Area of California. My interests are generally in sailing, golf, photography, and history.

Some of my photography projects are: [www.web4homes.com/cars Classic Autos] and my [www.web4homes.com/cameras Camera Collection]

My educational credentials are BS University of California Berkeley, and MBA University of Notre Dame. Life experience includes 30+ years of business management and entrepreneurial success.

Reduced participation in 2009

[edit]

While I remain absolutely dedicated to the success of this project, I will be so involved in other organizations and charities in 2009 that I can not focus on Wikipedia, at the level where I have recently participated. I’ve taken an executive position in my yacht club and Renee and I have increased our commitment to Special Olympics in light of recent reductions in charity contributions. However, if you think I can make a meaningful contribution to your efforts, please send me an email. --Kevin Murray (talk) 07:55, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

A great quote: "the internet is populated by eggshells armed with hammers."

Sailing on San Francisco Bay.

My Catalina 380 racing on San Francisco Bay.

My 1959 Porsche 356B; a 25 year project.

Useful Links:

Guidelines:

User pages

This editor is a Tutnum, and is entitled to display this Book of Knowledge

| | | The Original Barnstar | | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | | ------------------------- | | I hereby award you the Original Barnstar for your efforts to help stem the tide of thoughtless deletions. Tarinth 17:29, 29 December 2006 (UTC) | | |

| | | The Original Barnstar | | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | ------------------------- | | I hereby award you the Original Barnstar for your tireless efforts to improve Wikipedia by helping to make articles about somewhat notable subjects more encyclopedic and well-referenced. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 05:00, 4 February 2007 (UTC) | | |

| | | The Barnstar of Good Humor | | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | ------------------------------ | | I hereby award you the Barnstar of Good Humor for throwing the (phone) book at a flagrantly non-notable subject, with hilarious effect. — Antelan talk 09:51, 17 June 2007 (UTC) | | |

| | | For making a difference! | | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | ---------------------------- | | This Barnstar isn't free, this is a chain barnstar, as payment please give this star to at least 3-5 others with 500+ edits but no barnstar. — Antelan talk 09:51, 17 June 2007 (UTC) | | |

Drafts:User talk:Kevin Murray/fighter User:Kevin Murray/NF

GA Review template:GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail: