Development of an inverse simulation method for the analysis of train performance (original) (raw)

1. Hess RA, Gao C and Wang SH. A generalized technique for inverse simulation applied to aircraft maneuvers. AIAA J Guidance Control Dyn 1991; 14: 920–926. 2. Thomson DG and Bradley R. The principles and practical application of helicopter inverse simulation. Simulat Pract Theory 1998; 6: 47–70. 3. Thomson D and Bradley R. Inverse simulation as a tool for flight dynamics research – principles and applications. Prog Aerosp Sci 2006; 42: 174–210. 4. Lu L, Murray-Smith DJ and Thomson DG. Issues of numerical accuracy and stability in inverse simulation. Simulat Model Pract Theory 2008; 16: 1350–1364. 5. Thomson DG and Bradley R. Development and verification of an algorithm for helicopter inverse simulation. Vertica 1990; 14: 185–200. 6. Hamel PG. Aerospace vehicle modelling requirements for high bandwidth flight control. In: Cook MV and Rycroft MJ (eds) Aerospace vehicle dynamics and control. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press, 1994, pp.1–31. 7. Buchholz JJ and von Gru¨ nhagen W. Inversion impossible? Bremen: University of Applied Sciences, Technical Report, 2004. 8. Tagawa Y and Fukui K. Inverse dynamics calculation of nonlinear model using low sensitivity compensator. In: Proc of dynamics and design conf, 1994, pp.185–188. Tokyo, Japan: Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers. 9. Tagawa Y, Tu JY and Stoten DP. Inverse dynamics compensation via ‘simulation of feedback control systems’. Proc IMechE, Part I: J Systems and Control Engineering 2012; 225: 137–153. 10. Murray-Smith DJ. Feedback methods for inverse simulation of dynamic models for engineering system applications. Math Comput Model Dyn Syst 2011; 17: 515–541. 11. Murray-Smith DJ. Inverse simulation and analysis of underwater vehicle dynamics using feedback principle. Math Comput Model Dyn Syst 2014; 20: 45–65. Murray-Smith 13 12. Murray-Smith DJ and McGookin EW. A case study involving continuous system methods of inverse simulation for an unmanned aerial vehicle application. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering 2015; 229: 2700–2717. 13. Murray-Smith DJ. Modelling and simulation of integrated systems in engineering. Cambridge: Woodhead, 2012, Chapter 4. 14. Davis WJ Jr. The tractive resistance of electric locomotives and cars. Gen Electr Rev 1926; 29: 685–707. 15. Lukaszewicz P. Energy consumption and running time for trains. PhD Thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, 2001, https://pdfs.semanticscholar. org/b2a1/478bb878493fb4eee06e89f847d80e649309.pdf (accessed 22 December 2016). 16. Mathworks Inc. MATLAB�/Simulink� modelling and simulation software, http://www.mathworks.com/products/ (accessed 22 December 2016). 17. Campbell SL, Chancelier J-P and Nikoukhah R. Modeling and simulation in scilab/scicos. New York: Springer, 2000. 18. Lindfield G and Penny J. Numerical methods using MATLAB. Hemel Hempstead: Ellis Horwood, 1995. 19. Anon. T712 Report. Research into trains with lower mass in Britain: quantification of the benefits of train mass reduction. Annex E1. London: Rail Safety and Standards Board Ltd, 2010. 20. Murray-Smith DJ. Continuous system simulation. London: Chapman and Hall, 1995, Section 4.7. 21. Schenkendorf R and Groos J. Global sensitivity analysis applied to model inversion problems: a contribution to rail condition monitoring. Int J Prognost Health Manage 2015; 6: 14. https://www.phmsociety.org/sites/ phmsociety.org/files/phm_submission/2015/ijphm_15_ 019.pdf (accessed 22 December 2016