Comparing population-level mental health of UK workers before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal study using Understanding Society (original) (raw)

Kromydas, Theocharis ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2470-5940, Green, Michael ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3193-2452, Craig, Peter ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7653-5832, Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6593-9092, Leyland, Alastair H. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3741-7099, Niedzwiedz, Claire L. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6133-4168, Pearce, Anna ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0085-5263, Thomson, Rachel M. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3060-939X and Demou, Evangelia ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8616-525X(2022) Comparing population-level mental health of UK workers before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal study using Understanding Society.Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 76(6), pp. 527-536. (doi: 10.1136/jech-2021-218561) (PMID:35296523) (PMCID:PMC8931794)

Abstract

Objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic has substantially affected workers’ mental health. We investigated changes in UK workers’ mental health by industry, socioeconomic class and occupation and differential effects by UK country of residence, gender and age. Methods: We used representative Understanding Society data from 6474 adults (41 207 observations) in paid employment who participated in pre-pandemic (2017–2020) and at least one COVID-19 survey. The outcome was General Health Questionnaire-12 (GHQ-12) caseness (score: ≥4). Exposures were industry, socioeconomic class and occupation and are examined separately. Mixed-effects logistic regression was used to estimate relative (OR) and absolute (%) increases in distress before and during pandemic. Differential effects were investigated for UK countries of residence (non-England/England), gender (male/female) and age (younger/older) using three-way interaction effects. Results: GHQ-12 caseness increased in relative terms most for ‘professional, scientific and technical’ (OR: 3.15, 95% CI 2.17 to 4.59) industry in the pandemic versus pre-pandemic period. Absolute risk increased most in ‘hospitality’ (+11.4%). For socioeconomic class, ‘small employers/self-employed’ were most affected in relative and absolute terms (OR: 3.24, 95% CI 2.28 to 4.63; +10.3%). Across occupations, ‘sales and customer service’ (OR: 3.01, 95% CI 1.61 to 5.62; +10.7%) had the greatest increase. Analysis with three-way interactions showed considerable gender differences, while for UK country of residence and age results are mixed. Conclusions: GHQ-12 caseness increases during the pandemic were concentrated among ‘professional and technical’ and ‘hospitality’ industries and ‘small employers/self-employed’ and ‘sales and customers service’ workers. Female workers often exhibited greater differences in risk by industry and occupation. Policies supporting these industries and groups are needed.

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record

Funder and Project Information

1

Inequalities in health

Alastair Leyland

MC_UU_00022/2

HW - MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit

1

Inequalities in health

Alastair Leyland

SPHSU17

HW - MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit

Understanding the impacts of welfare policy on health: A novel data linkage study

Srinivasa Katikireddi

SCAF/15/02

SHW - Public Health

Predicting the impacts of universal basic income on mental health inequalities in the UK population: a microsimulation model

Rachel Thomson

218105/Z/19/Z

SHW - MRC/CSO Social & Public Health Sciences Unit

A machine learning approach to understanding comorbidity between mental and physical health conditions

Claire Niedzwiedz

MR/R024774/1

SHW - Public Health

Improving life chances & reducing child health inequalities: harnessing the untapped potential of existing data

Anna Pearce

205412/Z/16/Z

SHW - MRC/CSO Social & Public Health Sciences Unit

Deposit and Record Details