Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis (original) (raw)

Dibben, Grace O. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7254-5187, Faulkner, James, Oldridge, Neil, Rees, Karen, Thompson, David R., Zwisler, Ann-Dorthe and Taylor, Rod S. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3043-6011(2023) Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis.European Heart Journal, 44(6), pp. 452-469. (doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac747) (PMID:36746187) (PMCID:PMC9902155)

Abstract

Aims: Coronary heart disease is the most common reason for referral to exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) globally. However, the generalizability of previous meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is questioned. Therefore, a contemporary updated meta-analysis was undertaken. Methods and results: Database and trial registry searches were conducted to September 2020, seeking RCTs of exercise-based interventions with ≥6-month follow-up, compared with no-exercise control for adults with myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, or following coronary artery bypass graft, or percutaneous coronary intervention. The outcomes of mortality, recurrent clinical events, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis, and cost-effectiveness data were narratively synthesized. Meta-regression was used to examine effect modification. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. A total of 85 RCTs involving 23 430 participants with a median 12-month follow-up were included. Overall, exercise-based CR was associated with significant risk reductions in cardiovascular mortality [risk ratio (RR): 0.74, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.64–0.86, number needed to treat (NNT): 37], hospitalizations (RR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.67–0.89, NNT: 37), and myocardial infarction (RR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.70–0.96, NNT: 100). There was some evidence of significantly improved HRQoL with CR participation, and CR is cost-effective. There was no significant impact on overall mortality (RR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.89–1.04), coronary artery bypass graft (RR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.80–1.15), or percutaneous coronary intervention (RR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.69–1.02). No significant difference in effects was found across different patient groups, CR delivery models, doses, follow-up, or risk of bias. Conclusion: This review confirms that participation in exercise-based CR by patients with coronary heart disease receiving contemporary medical management reduces cardiovascular mortality, recurrent cardiac events, and hospitalizations and provides additional evidence supporting the improvement in HRQoL and the cost-effectiveness of CR.

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record

Funder and Project Information

1

Complexity in health

Sharon Simpson

MC_UU_00022/1

HW - MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit

1

Complexity in health

Sharon Simpson

SPHSU16

HW - MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit

Deposit and Record Details