Polarising plates: both omnivores and vegans represent in-group foods with eating simulations (original) (raw)

Davis, Tess ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7001-7439, Harkins, Libby and Papies, Esther K. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8460-675X(2025) Polarising plates: both omnivores and vegans represent in-group foods with eating simulations.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 51(5), pp. 742-758. (doi: 10.1177/01461672231202276) (PMID:37823529) (PMCID:PMC11930636)

Abstract

In two pre-registered experiments, we assessed how people cognitively represent meat and plant-based foods, to examine processes underlying dietary polarization in society. Food descriptions from U.K.-based omnivores (Nₑₓₚ. ₁ = 109; Nₑₓₚ. ₂ = 436) and vegans (Nₑₓₚ. ₁ = 111; Nₑₓₚ. ₂ = 407) were coded for features about consumption and reward (e.g., “rich,” “indulgent,” and “treat”) or features independent of the consumption situation (e.g., “healthy,” “protein,” and “eco-friendly”). Participants used more consumption and reward features for diet-congruent dishes (meat dishes for omnivores and plant-based dishes for vegans) than for diet-incongruent dishes (vice versa). Omnivores focused on abstract, long-term consequences of plant-based foods, whereas vegans focused on the socio-political associations with meat foods. Consumption and reward features also positively predicted attractiveness ratings, the likelihood of ordering a dish, and eating intentions. These findings indicate the cognitive processes of polarized dietary groups that may hinder the mainstream transition to more sustainable food choices.

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record

Funder and Project Information

Scottish Graduate School Science Doctoral Training Partnership (DTP)

Mary Beth Kneafsey

ES/P000681/1

SS - Academic & Student Administration

Deposit and Record Details