Comparison of measurement protocols for internal channels of transparent microfluidic devices (original) (raw)

Kaal, Joris, Feltin, Nicolas, Lelong, Marc, Yin, Huabing ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7693-377X, Glidle, Andrew, Romieu, Kevin and Batista, Elsa(2025) Comparison of measurement protocols for internal channels of transparent microfluidic devices.Metrology, 5(1), 4. (doi: 10.3390/metrology5010004)

Abstract

The microfluidic industry faces a significant challenge due to the lack of sensitive and standardized methods. One critical need is the measurement of internal channel dimensions in fully assembled chips. This study presents and compares several protocols for measuring these dimensions, including optical profilometry, optical microscopy, and tiled digital imagery. Standardized chips made from two materials commonly used in microfluidics (borosilicate glass and Cyclic Olefin Copolymer) were evaluated using each protocol. A consistency analysis using normalized error statistics identified optical profilometry as the most reliable method, offering the lowest uncertainty and the highest consistency with nominal geometry values. However, all protocols encountered difficulties with vertical depth measurements of internal structures. Future research should focus on addressing these limitations, including investigating the influence of multiple refractive surfaces on optical profilometry and exploring confocal microscopy. In conclusion, this work provides a comprehensive comparison of measurement protocols for internal microfluidic structures and offers a practical solution for applications in the microfluidic industry, while also identifying important directions for future research.

Item Type: Articles
Additional Information: This project 20NRM02 MFMET has received funding from the EMPIR programme co-financed by the Participating States and from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme.
Keywords: Microfluidic chips, optical measurements, channels dimensions, methods validation.
Status: Published
Refereed: Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID: Yin, Professor Huabing and Glidle, Dr Andrew
Creator Roles: Yin, H.Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Writing – original draftGlidle, A.Investigation
Authors: Kaal, J., Feltin, N., Lelong, M., Yin, H., Glidle, A., Romieu, K., and Batista, E.
College/School: College of Science and Engineering > School of Engineering > Biomedical Engineering
Journal Name: Metrology
Publisher: MDPI
ISSN: 2673-8244
ISSN (Online): 2673-8244
Published Online: 10 January 2025
Copyright Holders: Copyright © 2025 The Authors
First Published: First published in Metrology 5(1): 4
Publisher Policy: Reproduced under a Creative Commons License
Data DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.11621010

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record

Deposit and Record Details

ID Code: 344645
Depositing User: Miss Kathryn Hazlewood
Datestamp: 08 Jan 2025 10:17
Last Modified: 23 Jan 2025 15:34
Date of acceptance: 6 January 2025
Date of first online publication: 10 January 2025
Date Deposited: 23 January 2025
Data Availability Statement: Yes