Comparison of measurement protocols for internal channels of transparent microfluidic devices (original) (raw)
Kaal, Joris, Feltin, Nicolas, Lelong, Marc, Yin, Huabing ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7693-377X, Glidle, Andrew, Romieu, Kevin and Batista, Elsa(2025) Comparison of measurement protocols for internal channels of transparent microfluidic devices.Metrology, 5(1), 4. (doi: 10.3390/metrology5010004)
Abstract
The microfluidic industry faces a significant challenge due to the lack of sensitive and standardized methods. One critical need is the measurement of internal channel dimensions in fully assembled chips. This study presents and compares several protocols for measuring these dimensions, including optical profilometry, optical microscopy, and tiled digital imagery. Standardized chips made from two materials commonly used in microfluidics (borosilicate glass and Cyclic Olefin Copolymer) were evaluated using each protocol. A consistency analysis using normalized error statistics identified optical profilometry as the most reliable method, offering the lowest uncertainty and the highest consistency with nominal geometry values. However, all protocols encountered difficulties with vertical depth measurements of internal structures. Future research should focus on addressing these limitations, including investigating the influence of multiple refractive surfaces on optical profilometry and exploring confocal microscopy. In conclusion, this work provides a comprehensive comparison of measurement protocols for internal microfluidic structures and offers a practical solution for applications in the microfluidic industry, while also identifying important directions for future research.
| Item Type: | Articles |
|---|---|
| Additional Information: | This project 20NRM02 MFMET has received funding from the EMPIR programme co-financed by the Participating States and from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme. |
| Keywords: | Microfluidic chips, optical measurements, channels dimensions, methods validation. |
| Status: | Published |
| Refereed: | Yes |
| Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID: | Yin, Professor Huabing and Glidle, Dr Andrew |
| Creator Roles: | Yin, H.Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Writing – original draftGlidle, A.Investigation |
| Authors: | Kaal, J., Feltin, N., Lelong, M., Yin, H., Glidle, A., Romieu, K., and Batista, E. |
| College/School: | College of Science and Engineering > School of Engineering > Biomedical Engineering |
| Journal Name: | Metrology |
| Publisher: | MDPI |
| ISSN: | 2673-8244 |
| ISSN (Online): | 2673-8244 |
| Published Online: | 10 January 2025 |
| Copyright Holders: | Copyright © 2025 The Authors |
| First Published: | First published in Metrology 5(1): 4 |
| Publisher Policy: | Reproduced under a Creative Commons License |
| Data DOI: | 10.5281/zenodo.11621010 |
University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record
Deposit and Record Details
| ID Code: | 344645 |
|---|---|
| Depositing User: | Miss Kathryn Hazlewood |
| Datestamp: | 08 Jan 2025 10:17 |
| Last Modified: | 23 Jan 2025 15:34 |
| Date of acceptance: | 6 January 2025 |
| Date of first online publication: | 10 January 2025 |
| Date Deposited: | 23 January 2025 |
| Data Availability Statement: | Yes |