Cog-4 has limited diagnostic test accuracy and validity for cognitive assessment in stroke survivors (original) (raw)

Lees, Rosalind, Lua, Jane, Melling, Emily, Miao, Yen, Tan, Jia and Quinn, Terence J. ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1401-0181(2014) Cog-4 has limited diagnostic test accuracy and validity for cognitive assessment in stroke survivors.Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, 23(6), pp. 1604-1610. (doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2013.12.042)

Full text not currently available from Enlighten.

Publisher's URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2013.12.042

Abstract

Background: Guidelines recommend cognitive screening for all stroke survivors but do not suggest a preferred tool. Certain elements (orientation, executive function, language, and inattention) of the impairment scale, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), have been suggested as a short cognitive screening test—Cog-4. We aimed to describe accuracy and validity of Cog-4 against a more detailed cognitive assessment (Montreal Cognitive Assessment [MoCA]). Methods: We assessed consecutive acute stroke unit admissions in 2 hospitals over 3 months. Four independent blinded assessors performed NIHSS and MoCA between days 1 and 4 poststroke. We described test properties of Cog-4 for MoCA-defined cognitive impairment using usual thresholds (Cog-4 ≥ 1 and MoCA < 26 of 30) and described the correlations of individual Cog-4 components with broadly equivalent MoCA domains. Results: We assessed 173 participants; 166 had Cog-4 data and 148 MoCA. MoCA described 84% (n = 124) of assessed participants as having cognitive impairment and the Cog-4, 37% (n = 62). Cog-4 had a sensitivity of .36 (95% confidence interval [CI]: .28-.45) and a specificity of .96 (95% CI: .80-.99) (positive predictive value: .98, negative predictive value: .23) for MoCA-defined cognitive impairment. Individual Cog-4 items correlated with certain MoCA domains, but the strength of association was modest (r = −.44 orientation, −.37 language, −.19 for inattention, and no significant correlation for executive function, P = .72). Conclusions: Our data suggest that many stroke survivors with MoCA-defined cognitive problems would not be detected by Cog-4. Subtest correlations suggest that Cog-4 may not be a valid measure of the cognitive domains that it purports to describe. Other brief cognitive screening tests may be better suited to acute stroke.

Item Type: Articles
Status: Published
Refereed: Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID: Quinn, Professor Terry
Authors: Lees, R., Lua, J., Melling, E., Miao, Y., Tan, J., and Quinn, T. J.
College/School: College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Cardiovascular & Metabolic Health
Journal Name: Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
Publisher: W.B. Saunders
ISSN: 1052-3057
ISSN (Online): 1532-8511

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record

Deposit and Record Details

ID Code: 93365
Depositing User: Ms Mary Anne Meyering
Datestamp: 02 May 2014 10:29
Last Modified: 23 Sep 2021 18:55
Date of first online publication: July 2014