Profitability and environmental implications of innovative practice changes and irrigation improvements (original) (raw)

Export / Share

- Export / Share

+ Export / Share

Share this record

Export this record

PlumX

- PlumX

+ PlumX

Altmetric

- Altmetric

+ Altmetric

View Altmetric information about this item.

Connolly, C., Renouf, M. A., Nothard, B., Milbank, H. and Poggio, M. J. (2024)Profitability and environmental implications of innovative practice changes and irrigation improvements. Sugar Industry International, 149 (12). pp. 817-823. https://doi.org/10.36961/si32562

Full text not currently attached. Access may be available via the Publisher's website or OpenAccess link.

Article Link: https://doi.org/10.36961/si32562

Abstract

The economic and environmental benefits of practice changes and irrigation improvements are explored based on three grower case studies in the Bundaberg, Burdekin and Mackay regions that consider grower investments in best management practices, including irrigation changes. How the practice changes influenced farm economic and environmental performance are determined. Economic, biophysical and farm management data before and after the changes were used to calculate the economic benefit (Annualised Equivalent Benefit) with the Farm Economic Analysis Tool (FEAT) and an investment analysis. The economic benefit was positive for all farms, ranging from AUD29 to AUD377 per hectare per year. The same data were used to calculate indicators of environmental performance (per tonne of harvested cane) using the Cane Life Cycle Assessment (CaneLCA) tool. There were reductions in fossil-fuel use, greenhouse-gas emissions, and a potential for water pollution curtailment. For the Bundaberg case, a transition from furrow to low-pressure boom irrigation increased electricity use, which was offset by energy savings from other aspects of the production system changes. For the Burdekin case, improved water-use efficiency on a farm with permeable soils resulted in less electricity use and greenhouse gas emissions. For the Mackay case, improved utilisation of water allocation increased cane productivity and contributed to improved economic and eco-efficiency outcomes. While total water use increased, it is noted that water availability is not a constraint for the Mackay region outside of drought impacts. The Mackay case also involved a supplementary analysis of solar energy use. Overall, the case studies showed that the suites of irrigation improvements and practice changes resulted in both economic and eco-efficiency benefits.

Item Type: Article
Corporate Creators: Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Queensland
Business groups: Agriculture
Keywords: farm economics, irrigation, drainage, FEAT, life cycle assessment, CaneLCA, controlled traffic, legumes, reduced tillage, nitrogen, herbicides, carbon, practice change
Subjects: Agriculture > Agriculture (General) > Agricultural economicsAgriculture > Agriculture (General) > Special aspects of agriculture as a whole > Sustainable agricultureAgriculture > Agriculture (General) > Agricultural educationAgriculture > Agriculture (General) > Farm economics. Farm management. Agricultural mathematicsAgriculture > Agriculture (General) > Agriculture and the environmentAgriculture > Agriculture (General) > Soils. Soil scienceAgriculture > Agriculture (General) > Improvement, reclamation, fertilisation, irrigation etc., of lands (Melioration)Agriculture > Agriculture (General) > FertilisersAgriculture > Agriculture (General) > Conservation of natural resourcesPlant culture > Field crops > Sugar plantsAquaculture and Fisheries > Fisheries > By region or country > Australia > Great Barrier ReefAgriculture > By region or country > Australia > Queensland
Live Archive: 15 Dec 2024 23:34
Last Modified: 15 Dec 2024 23:34

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Aboriginal people and Torres Strait Islander people are advised the journals and articles on this site may contain images or names of deceased persons in photographs or printed material. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander material and information accessed on this site may be culturally sensitive for some individuals and communities. Some material may contain language, terms, or descriptions that reflect the authors' views, or those of the period in which the item was written and may be considered inappropriate today. These views are not necessarily the views of the Department. While the information may not reflect current understandings, it is provided in an historical context.