Carbohydrate reserve regulation and fruit productivity in two mango cultivars at high or low planting densities (original) (raw)

Export / Share

Export / Share

Export / Share

Share this record

Export this record

Rossouw, G. C., Tamelini, B. R., Orr, R. and Dickinson, G. R. (2025)Carbohydrate reserve regulation and fruit productivity in two mango cultivars at high or low planting densities. In: XIII International Symposium on Integrating Canopy, Rootstock and Environmental Physiology in Orchard Systems, 19 to 24 January 2025, Napier, New Zealand.

Full text not currently attached. Access may be available via the Publisher's website or OpenAccess link.

Abstract

Enhancing fruit productivity in mango orchards often involves increasing the number of trees planted per unit land area, yet higher planting density can lead to reduced yields per tree due to smaller canopies. Non-structural carbohydrate availability and its allocation to reproductive development are critical for tree-level productivity optimisation. This study explores the link between carbohydrate reserves and fruit yields per tree across two growing seasons (2023/24 and 2024/25). We compared starch and sugars in major storage organs, roots and trunk wood, of two mango cultivars, ‘NMBP 1243’ and ‘Keitt’, grown at two planting densities (208 and 1250 trees per hectare) in Australia. Samples were collected from six trees of each cultivar at both densities, at key phenological stages each season. We established baseline carbohydrate reserves influenced by prior cropping, assessed carbohydrate replenishment before the next fruiting cycle, and evaluated carbohydrate usage during fruit growth. Leaf stomatal conductance, density and chlorophyll content were additionally monitored as indicators of photosynthetic capacity. Subsequently, the relationships between fruit productivity and tree carbohydrate dynamics were assessed. The results suggest that ‘Keitt’ exhibits superior productivity capacity due to highly functional leaves and a greater reliance on carbohydrate reserves to support fruiting. ‘Keitt’ could be considered an ‘optimistic’ carbohydrate regulator, utilising carbohydrate resources more e iciently. In contrast, ‘NMBP 1243’ trees tend to exhibit larger vegetative canopies and appear to adopt a more ‘pessimistic’ approach to utilising carbohydrates for fruiting. ‘Keitt’ appears particularly suitable for higher planting density orchards due to its ability to regulate carbohydrate reserves and produce more fruit on a canopy volume basis.

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Aboriginal people and Torres Strait Islander people are advised the journals and articles on this site may contain images or names of deceased persons in photographs or printed material. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander material and information accessed on this site may be culturally sensitive for some individuals and communities. Some material may contain language, terms, or descriptions that reflect the authors' views, or those of the period in which the item was written and may be considered inappropriate today. These views are not necessarily the views of the Department. While the information may not reflect current understandings, it is provided in an historical context.