David Svolba | Fitchburg State University (original) (raw)
Uploads
Unpopular Philosophy by David Svolba
J.S. Swindell has argued that Harry Frankfurt's analysis of ambivalence is ambiguous and that it ... more J.S. Swindell has argued that Harry Frankfurt's analysis of ambivalence is ambiguous and that it fails to do justice to the full range of this psychological phenomenon. Building on her criticism of Frankfurt, Swindell offers an analysis of ambivalence which is supposed to clarify ambiguities in Frankfurt's analysis and reveal varieties of ambivalence that Frankfurt's analysis allegedly overlooks. In this brief reply, I argue that Frankfurt's analysis of ambivalence is neither ambiguous nor objectionably narrow. I conclude with remarks on Swindell's analysis of the relationship between ambivalence and weakness of the will.
Popular Philosophy by David Svolba
Talks by David Svolba
Teaching Documents by David Svolba
I. The Two Most Common Mistakes Students Make When Writing a Philosophy Essay 1. Students fail to... more I. The Two Most Common Mistakes Students Make When Writing a Philosophy Essay 1. Students fail to understand the purpose of a Philosophy Essay, which is to provide a reasoned defense of a clearly stated claim or thesis. A philosophy essay is not about self-expression; it is not a venue for showing off how much you know; and nor is it a venue for reporting your various opinions and/or feelings concerning a particular subject. Its structure is really quite simple and straightforward-or at least it ought to be. The student is writing the essay because she believes that P or she believes that not-P, and she wants to persuade her audience of the truth of her belief by providing her reasons for believing that P or her reasons for believing that not-P.
Papers by David Svolba
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 2016
J.S. Swindell has argued that Harry Frankfurt's analysis of ambivalence is ambiguous and that it ... more J.S. Swindell has argued that Harry Frankfurt's analysis of ambivalence is ambiguous and that it fails to do justice to the full range of this psychological phenomenon. Building on her criticism of Frankfurt, Swindell offers an analysis of ambivalence which is supposed to clarify ambiguities in Frankfurt's analysis and reveal varieties of ambivalence that Frankfurt's analysis allegedly overlooks. In this brief reply, I argue that Frankfurt's analysis of ambivalence is neither ambiguous nor objectionably narrow. I conclude with remarks on Swindell's analysis of the relationship between ambivalence and weakness of the will.
I. The Two Most Common Mistakes Students Make When Writing a Philosophy Essay 1. Students fail to... more I. The Two Most Common Mistakes Students Make When Writing a Philosophy Essay 1. Students fail to understand the purpose of a Philosophy Essay, which is to provide a reasoned defense of a clearly stated claim or thesis. A philosophy essay is not about self-expression; it is not a venue for showing off how much you know; and nor is it a venue for reporting your various opinions and/or feelings concerning a particular subject. Its structure is really quite simple and straightforward-or at least it ought to be. The student is writing the essay because she believes that P or she believes that not-P, and she wants to persuade her audience of the truth of her belief by providing her reasons for believing that P or her reasons for believing that not-P.
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 2016