[CI]【Hackathon 9th Sprint No.48】NO.48 功能模块 fastdeploy/engine/resource_manager.py 单测补充 by essos-bot · Pull Request #5043 · PaddlePaddle/FastDeploy (original) (raw)
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
Conversation2 Commits3 Checks16 Files changed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
[ Show hidden characters]({{ revealButtonHref }})
Motivation
NO.48 功能模块 fastdeploy/engine/resource_manager.py 单测补充
Modifications
NO.48 功能模块 fastdeploy/engine/resource_manager.py 单测补充
Usage or Command
no need
Accuracy Tests
no
Checklist
- Add at least a tag in the PR title.
- Tag list: [
[FDConfig],[APIServer],[Engine],[Scheduler],[PD Disaggregation],[Executor],[Graph Optimization],[Speculative Decoding],[RL],[Models],[Quantization],[Loader],[OP],[KVCache],[DataProcessor],[BugFix],[Docs],[CI],[Optimization],[Feature],[Benchmark],[Others],[XPU],[HPU],[GCU],[DCU],[Iluvatar],[Metax]] - You can add new tags based on the PR content, but the semantics must be clear.
- Tag list: [
- Format your code, run
pre-commitbefore commit. - Add unit tests. Please write the reason in this PR if no unit tests.
- Provide accuracy results.
- If the current PR is submitting to the
releasebranch, make sure the PR has been submitted to thedevelopbranch, then cherry-pick it to thereleasebranch with the[Cherry-Pick]PR tag.
Thanks for your contribution!
Codecov Report
✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
⚠️ Please upload report for BASE (develop@8aec3ac). Learn more about missing BASE report.
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@ ## develop #5043 +/- ##
Coverage ? 60.20%
Files ? 322
Lines ? 39198
Branches ? 5889
Hits ? 23599
Misses ? 13739
Partials ? 1860
| Flag | Coverage Δ |
|---|---|
| GPU | 60.20% <ø> (?) |
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
- ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.