Removal of six & styling by nicholascar · Pull Request #1051 · RDFLib/rdflib (original) (raw)

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I see. In practise I think l is good enough (in spite of flake8), but following that general advice, I think lst would be better, or even if we could establish a naming pattern like rlist (and similarly one for types, like rtype). (Going for rdf_list and rdf_type may seem even better/clearer, unless it becomes unclear whether they would reference an object or the terms themselves (RDF.type and RDF.List).)

Just something to consider going further, nothing critical for this PR.