Enum Improvements (original) (raw)
Enums are essential commonly used types but have several areas in need of improvement. For each non-generic Enum
method there should be an equivalent generic version.
Rationale and Usage
- Nearly all of
Enum
's static methods are non-generic leading to the following issues.- Requires boxing for methods with enum input parameters losing type-safety, eg.
IsDefined
andGetName
. - Requires casting/unboxing for methods with an enum return value, eg.
ToObject
andGetValues
. - Requires the enum type to be explicitly specified as an argument.
- Requires invocation using static method syntax.
- Requires boxing for methods with enum input parameters losing type-safety, eg.
With this proposal implemented what used to be this to validate a standard enum value
MyEnum value = ???; bool isValid = Enum.IsDefined(typeof(MyEnum), value);
now becomes this
MyEnum value = ???; bool isValid = value.IsDefined();
With this implemented it will address #18063.
Proposed API
namespace System { public abstract class Enum : ValueType, IComparable, IConvertible, IFormattable { public static TEnum Parse(ReadOnlySpan value) where TEnum : struct, Enum; public static TEnum Parse(ReadOnlySpan value, bool ignoreCase) where TEnum : struct, Enum; public static object Parse(Type enumType, ReadOnlySpan value); public static object Parse(Type enumType, ReadOnlySpan value, bool ignoreCase); public static bool TryParse(ReadOnlySpan value, out TEnum result) where TEnum : struct, Enum; public static bool TryParse(ReadOnlySpan value, bool ignoreCase, out TEnum result) where TEnum : struct, Enum; public static bool TryParse(Type enumType, ReadOnlySpan value, out object result); public static bool TryParse(Type enumType, ReadOnlySpan value, bool ignoreCase, out object result);
// Generic versions of existing methods
public static string GetName<TEnum>(this TEnum value) where TEnum : struct, Enum;
public static IReadOnlyList<string> GetNames<TEnum>() where TEnum : struct, Enum;
public static IReadOnlyList<TEnum> GetValues<TEnum>() where TEnum : struct, Enum;
public static bool IsDefined<TEnum>(this TEnum value) where TEnum : struct, Enum;
public static TEnum ToObject<TEnum>(object value) where TEnum : struct, Enum;
public static TEnum ToObject<TEnum>(sbyte value) where TEnum : struct, Enum;
public static TEnum ToObject<TEnum>(byte value) where TEnum : struct, Enum;
public static TEnum ToObject<TEnum>(short value) where TEnum : struct, Enum;
public static TEnum ToObject<TEnum>(ushort value) where TEnum : struct, Enum;
public static TEnum ToObject<TEnum>(int value) where TEnum : struct, Enum;
public static TEnum ToObject<TEnum>(uint value) where TEnum : struct, Enum;
public static TEnum ToObject<TEnum>(long value) where TEnum : struct, Enum;
public static TEnum ToObject<TEnum>(ulong value) where TEnum : struct, Enum;
public static int CompareTo<TEnum>(TEnum value, TEnum other) where TEnum : struct, Enum;
public static bool Equals<TEnum>(TEnum value, TEnum other) where TEnum : struct, Enum;
public static byte ToByte<TEnum>(TEnum value) where TEnum : struct, Enum;
public static short ToInt16<TEnum>(TEnum value) where TEnum : struct, Enum;
public static int ToInt32<TEnum>(TEnum value) where TEnum : struct, Enum;
public static long ToInt64<TEnum>(TEnum value) where TEnum : struct, Enum;
public static sbyte ToSByte<TEnum>(TEnum value) where TEnum : struct, Enum;
public static string ToString<TEnum>(TEnum value) where TEnum : struct, Enum;
public static string ToString<TEnum>(TEnum value, string format) where TEnum : struct, Enum;
public static ushort ToUInt16<TEnum>(TEnum value) where TEnum : struct, Enum;
public static uint ToUInt32<TEnum>(TEnum value) where TEnum : struct, Enum;
public static ulong ToUInt64<TEnum>(TEnum value) where TEnum : struct, Enum;
}
}
API Details
This proposal makes use of a C#
language feature that needs to be added in order for this proposal to make the most impact.
This proposal specifies extension methods within System.Enum
and as such requires C#
to allow extension methods within non-static classes as is proposed in csharplang#301. Promoting these to extension methods later would be a breaking change due to csharplang#665 but I feel this is acceptable.
Alternatively, the extension methods could be defined in a separate static EnumExtensions
class. This is uglier but would avoid this issue and the extension methods would be available immediately instead of needing to wait for a later C#
version to support this.
Open Questions
- Is promoting the
System.Enum
extension methods later an acceptable breaking change due to csharplang#665? If not should we wait for a laterC#
version that supports extension methods inSystem.Enum
or should we introduce a separateEnumExtensions
class?
Implementation Details
This proposal stems from my work on the open source library Enums.NET which addresses each of these issues and will be the basis for an implementation. For efficiency this is how Enums.NET
is implemented.
First, using Enum
as a generic type argument causes generic code-explosion in today's runtimes so it's essential that it's included sparingly. For this reason most logic is contained in an EnumCache<TInt, TIntProvider> object where TInt
is the underlying type and TIntProvider
is the underlying type's operations provider which implements the interface INumericProvider which provides the bitwise operations and other needed operations. Including the TIntProvider
as a type parameter allows the runtime to inline calls to its methods so there's no interface method dispatch, a technique described in this generic calculations article.
Now how can one access this EnumCache
object when the caller only has the enum type as a generic type argument? This is solved by the bridge-like object EnumInfo<TEnum, TInt, TIntProvider> which implements the interfaces IEnumInfo for generic methods and IEnumInfo for non-generic methods. It simply acts as a bridge to delegate calls from the interfaces to EnumCache<TInt, TIntProvider>
. In order to do that it needs to be able to efficiently convert values between TEnum
and TInt
. This is performed by the conversion methods ToInt and ToEnum which are declared as extern
methods for efficiency so that they're simply defined as casts from one type to the other. These method's functionality can be achieved with the Unsafe.As
method. This EnumInfo<TEnum, TInt, TIntProvider>
is created via reflection upon it's first call and is stored in the static field Enums.Info as an IEnumInfo<TEnum>
which is then called by Enums's generic methods.
For non-generic methods the RuntimeType.GenericCache
property will be set to the IEnumInfo
to use.
Updates
- Added more implementation details.
- Added more API details.
- Added enumerating members usage example.
- Added generic versions of instance methods for performance reasons.
- Removed the
System.Enums
namespace and moved its members into theSystem
namespace. - Moved
PrimaryAttribute
into theSystem.ComponentModel
namespace and switched to using the existingSystem.ComponentModel.AttributeCollection
. - Removed
IsValid
method as it's meaning is rather subjective and promotedIsValidFlagCombination
as an extension method. - Renamed
GetAllFlags
toAllFlags
as it more closely resembles a property but can't be because it is generic. Similar naming toArray.Empty
. - Removed
EnumComparer
as one can just useComparer<T>.Default
andEqualityComparer<T>.Default
instead. - Split the proposed API to a base API addition and an
EnumMember
support API addition. - Added
ReadOnlySpan<char>
parse overloads. - Moved
FlagEnum.IsFlagEnum
intoSystem.Enum
. - No longer proposes adding the
Enum
constraint to existing methods. - Split
EnumMember
API addition into the separate issue dotnet/corefx#34077. - Split generic API additions that don't necessitate the performance improvements of this implementation to separate issue API Proposal: Add a Generic version of GetValues to Enum (probably GetName/GetNames) #2364.
- Split Flag API additions to separate issue dotnet/corefx#34079.
- Split
PrimaryAttribute
addition to separate issue dotnet/corefx#34080. - Moved
Format
to API Proposal: Add a Generic version of GetValues to Enum (probably GetName/GetNames) #2364 as well. - Moved proposed methods from API Proposal: Add a Generic version of GetValues to Enum (probably GetName/GetNames) #2364 back to this issue.
- Removed
Format
as it's no different fromToString(string format)
except it throws anArgumentNullException
for anull
format
parameter.