Replace the Suboptimal fuzz_tree.py Harness With a Better Alternative by DaveLak · Pull Request #1910 · gitpython-developers/GitPython (original) (raw)

As discussed in the initial fuzzing integration PR1, fuzz_tree.py's implementation was not ideal in terms of coverage and its reading/writing to hard-coded paths inside /tmp was problematic as (among other concerns), it causes intermittent crashes on ClusterFuzz2 when multiple workers execute the test at the same time on the same machine.

The changes here replace fuzz_tree.py completely with a completely new fuzz_repo.py fuzz target which:

Here are some very rough stats to give a very rough idea of the difference:

Metric fuzz_repo.py (my local testing) fuzz_tree.py (most recent successful CF run)
Coverage 789 163
Features 1023 269
Corpus 19 entries / 57 bytes 30 entries / 1872 bytes

Note on License

Because fuzz_tree.py was removed and fuzz_repo.py was not derived from it, the Apache License call outs in the docs were also updated as they only apply to the singe fuzz_config.py file now.

Footnotes

  1. https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython/pull/1901#discussion_r1565001609
  2. https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=68355