fix: annotating some fields as REQUIRED by gcf-owl-bot[bot] · Pull Request #1695 · googleapis/java-spanner (original) (raw)

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account

Conversation8 Commits2 Checks0 Files changed

Conversation

This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters

[ Show hidden characters]({{ revealButtonHref }})

[gcf-owl-bot[bot]](/apps/gcf-owl-bot)

@gcf-owl-bot

@gcf-owl-bot

suztomo

@thiagotnunes

Is this a breaking change? If so, it would require us to do a major release, which is not ideal

@ansh0l could you follow up?

@ansh0l

@suztomo suztomo added the automerge

Merge the pull request once unit tests and other checks pass.

label

Feb 17, 2022

suztomo

suztomo previously approved these changes Feb 17, 2022

@gcf-merge-on-green

@suztomo

@ansh0l cl/429093810 has description about the change and it says the author doesn't expect breaking change in customers' code. If this is the case, there's no need to bump the major version.

The automation bot reads "!" in "feat!" for breaking changes. If this is not a breaking change, then remove "!" from the PR title. When merging, ensure the squashed commit to the main branch doesn't have "!" either.

ansh0l

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, will go with suggestion by @suztomo for minor revision bump

@ansh0l

Will be parking this PR for some more time before other major PRs are shipped for java and jdbc.

@Neenu1995 Neenu1995 changed the titlefix!: annotating some fields as REQUIRED fix: annotating some fields as REQUIRED

Feb 24, 2022

@thiagotnunes

@ansh0l afaik we can merge now, because we removed the !, so it won't be a breaking change. Or do we need to wait for anything else?

@ansh0l

@thiagotnunes I think we are good. I was busy with Spangres merges yesterday, so kept it waiting for another day.

@ansh0l ansh0l removed the do not merge

Indicates a pull request not ready for merge, due to either quality or timing.

label

Feb 25, 2022

gcf-owl-bot bot added a commit that referenced this pull request

Nov 7, 2022

@gcf-owl-bot

rajatbhatta pushed a commit to rajatbhatta/java-spanner that referenced this pull request

Nov 17, 2022

@gcf-owl-bot