Fetch data for all installers, not only pip by hugovk · Pull Request #39 · hugovk/top-pypi-packages (original) (raw)
Helps #36.
❯ pypinfo --help ... Options: ... --all Show downloads by all installers, not only pip.
pypinfo --all tells it to fetch data for all installers, and not to filter to only pip (the default).
(--all was added to pypinfo in ofek/pypinfo#51.)
This results in a cheaper BigQuery call: the pip-only query costs an extra 25% in bytes processed, in bytes billed, and in dollars; see #36 (comment).
| installer_name | download_count |
|---|---|
| pip | 1,121,198,711 |
| uv | 117,194,833 |
| requests | 29,828,272 |
| poetry | 23,009,454 |
| None | 8,916,745 |
| bandersnatch | 6,171,555 |
| setuptools | 1,362,797 |
| Bazel | 1,280,271 |
| Browser | 1,096,328 |
| Nexus | 593,230 |
| Homebrew | 510,247 |
| Artifactory | 69,063 |
| pdm | 62,904 |
| OS | 13,108 |
| devpi | 9,530 |
| conda | 2,272 |
| pex | 194 |
| Total | 1,311,319,514 |
pip is still by far the most popular installer, and unsurprising uv is up there too, with about 10% of pip's downloads.
The others are 10% of uv or less. A lot of them are mirroring services, that we wanted to exclude before.
I think given uv's importance, and my expectation that it will continue to take a bigger share of the pie, plus especially the extra cost for filtering by just pip, means that we should switch to fetching data for all downloaders. Plus the others don't account for that much of the pie.