[clang] Fix ASTWriter crash after merging named enums by michael-jabbour-sonarsource · Pull Request #114240 · llvm/llvm-project (original) (raw)
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-modules
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Michael Jabbour (michael-jabbour-sonarsource)
Changes
Clang already has a mechanism to cleanup enumerators for typedefs to anonymous enums. So the following example code used to be handled correctly while merging, and ASTWriter behaves as expected:
typedef enum { Val } AnonEnum;
However, the mentioned mechanism didn't handle named enums. This lead to stale declarations in IdResolver
, causing an assertion violation in ASTWriter Assertion
DeclIDs.contains(D) && "Declaration not emitted!"' failed.` when a module is being serialized with the following merged enums:
typedef enum Enum1 { Val_A } Enum1; enum Enum2 { Val_B };
The PR applies the same mechanism in the named enums case. Additionally, I dropped the call to getLexicalDeclContext()->removeDecl
as it was causing a wrong odr-violation diagnostic with anonymous enums.
Might be easier to to review commit by commit. Any feedback is appreciated.
Context
This fixes frontend crashes that were encountered when certain Objective-C modules are included on Xcode 16. For example, by running CC=/path/to/clang-19 xcodebuild clean build
on a project that contains the following Objective-C file:
#include <os/atomic.h>
int main() { return memory_order_relaxed; }
This crashes the parser in release, when ASTReader tried to load the enumerator declaration.
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114240.diff
5 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/include/clang/Sema/Sema.h (+7-1)
- (modified) clang/lib/Parse/ParseDecl.cpp (+1-1)
- (modified) clang/lib/Parse/ParseDeclCXX.cpp (+2-1)
- (modified) clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp (+17-13)
- (added) clang/test/Modules/modules-merge-enum.m (+94)
diff --git a/clang/include/clang/Sema/Sema.h b/clang/include/clang/Sema/Sema.h index 93d98e1cbb9c81..d53bcf63dd1bd9 100644 --- a/clang/include/clang/Sema/Sema.h +++ b/clang/include/clang/Sema/Sema.h @@ -3910,7 +3910,7 @@ class Sema final : public SemaBase { /// Perform ODR-like check for C/ObjC when merging tag types from modules. /// Differently from C++, actually parse the body and reject / error out /// in case of a structural mismatch.
- bool ActOnDuplicateDefinition(Decl *Prev, SkipBodyInfo &SkipBody);
bool ActOnDuplicateDefinition(Scope *S, Decl *Prev, SkipBodyInfo &SkipBody);
typedef void *SkippedDefinitionContext;
@@ -4034,6 +4034,12 @@ class Sema final : public SemaBase { void MergeTypedefNameDecl(Scope *S, TypedefNameDecl *New, LookupResult &OldDecls);
- /// RetireNodesFromMergedDecl - We have just merged the decl 'New' by making
- /// another definition visible.
- /// This method performs any necessary cleanup on the parser state to discard
- /// child nodes from newly parsed decl we are retiring.
- void RetireNodesFromMergedDecl(Scope *S, Decl *New);
- /// MergeFunctionDecl - We just parsed a function 'New' from /// declarator D which has the same name and scope as a previous /// declaration 'Old'. Figure out how to resolve this situation, diff --git a/clang/lib/Parse/ParseDecl.cpp b/clang/lib/Parse/ParseDecl.cpp index 31984453487aef..750301a9155d79 100644 --- a/clang/lib/Parse/ParseDecl.cpp +++ b/clang/lib/Parse/ParseDecl.cpp @@ -5645,7 +5645,7 @@ void Parser::ParseEnumSpecifier(SourceLocation StartLoc, DeclSpec &DS, Decl *D = SkipBody.CheckSameAsPrevious ? SkipBody.New : TagDecl; ParseEnumBody(StartLoc, D); if (SkipBody.CheckSameAsPrevious &&
!Actions.ActOnDuplicateDefinition(TagDecl, SkipBody)) {
} diff --git a/clang/lib/Parse/ParseDeclCXX.cpp b/clang/lib/Parse/ParseDeclCXX.cpp index 60aab1411a96c5..505dff17bd80f2 100644 --- a/clang/lib/Parse/ParseDeclCXX.cpp +++ b/clang/lib/Parse/ParseDeclCXX.cpp @@ -2350,7 +2350,8 @@ void Parser::ParseClassSpecifier(tok::TokenKind TagTokKind, // Parse the definition body. ParseStructUnionBody(StartLoc, TagType, cast(D)); if (SkipBody.CheckSameAsPrevious &&!Actions.ActOnDuplicateDefinition(getCurScope(), TagDecl, SkipBody)) { DS.SetTypeSpecError(); return;
!Actions.ActOnDuplicateDefinition(TagOrTempResult.get(), SkipBody)) {
!Actions.ActOnDuplicateDefinition(getCurScope(),
TagOrTempResult.get(), SkipBody)) { DS.SetTypeSpecError(); return; }
diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp index f8e5f3c6d309d6..a38d2d00a5410d 100644 --- a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp +++ b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp @@ -2551,18 +2551,7 @@ void Sema::MergeTypedefNameDecl(Scope *S, TypedefNameDecl *New, // Make the old tag definition visible. makeMergedDefinitionVisible(Hidden);
// If this was an unscoped enumeration, yank all of its enumerators
// out of the scope.
if (isa<EnumDecl>(NewTag)) {
Scope *EnumScope = getNonFieldDeclScope(S);
for (auto *D : NewTag->decls()) {
auto *ED = cast<EnumConstantDecl>(D);
assert(EnumScope->isDeclScope(ED));
EnumScope->RemoveDecl(ED);
IdResolver.RemoveDecl(ED);
ED->getLexicalDeclContext()->removeDecl(ED);
}
}
} }RetireNodesFromMergedDecl(S, NewTag);
@@ -2639,6 +2628,19 @@ void Sema::MergeTypedefNameDecl(Scope *S, TypedefNameDecl *New, notePreviousDefinition(Old, New->getLocation()); }
+void Sema::RetireNodesFromMergedDecl(Scope *S, Decl *New) {
- // If this was an unscoped enumeration, yank all of its enumerators
- // out of the scope.
- if (auto *ED = dyn_cast(New); ED && !ED->isScoped()) {
- Scope *EnumScope = getNonFieldDeclScope(S);
- for (auto *ECD : ED->enumerators()) {
assert(EnumScope->isDeclScope(ECD));
EnumScope->RemoveDecl(ECD);
IdResolver.RemoveDecl(ECD);
- }
- } +}
- /// DeclhasAttr - returns true if decl Declaration already has the target /// attribute. static bool DeclHasAttr(const Decl *D, const Attr *A) { @@ -18059,12 +18061,14 @@ void Sema::ActOnTagStartDefinition(Scope *S, Decl *TagD) { AddPushedVisibilityAttribute(Tag); }
-bool Sema::ActOnDuplicateDefinition(Decl *Prev, SkipBodyInfo &SkipBody) { +bool Sema::ActOnDuplicateDefinition(Scope *S, Decl *Prev,
SkipBodyInfo &SkipBody) {
if (!hasStructuralCompatLayout(Prev, SkipBody.New)) return false;
// Make the previous decl visible. makeMergedDefinitionVisible(SkipBody.Previous);
RetireNodesFromMergedDecl(S, SkipBody.New); return true; }
diff --git a/clang/test/Modules/modules-merge-enum.m b/clang/test/Modules/modules-merge-enum.m
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000000..4873c7e6b4708e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/clang/test/Modules/modules-merge-enum.m
@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
+// RUN: rm -rf %t
+// RUN: split-file %s %t
+
+// RUN: %clang -fmodules -fmodules-cache-path=%t/modcache -fsyntax-only %t/source.m -Xclang -ast-dump-all 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
+
+
+//--- shared.h
+// This header is shared between two modules, but it's not a module itself.
+// The enums defined here are parsed in both modules, and merged while building ModB.
+
+typedef enum MyEnum1 { MyVal_A } MyEnum1;
+// CHECK: |-EnumDecl 0x{{.}} imported in ModA.ModAFile1 MyEnum1
+// CHECK-NEXT: | |-also in ModB
+// CHECK-NEXT: | -EnumConstantDecl 0x{{.*}} imported in ModA.ModAFile1 referenced MyVal_A 'int' +// CHECK-NEXT: |-TypedefDecl 0x{{.*}} imported in ModA.ModAFile1 hidden MyEnum1 'enum MyEnum1' +// CHECK-NEXT: |
-ElaboratedType 0x{{.}} 'enum MyEnum1' sugar imported
+// CHECK-NEXT: | -EnumType 0x{{.*}} 'enum MyEnum1' imported +// CHECK-NEXT: |
-Enum 0x{{.}} 'MyEnum1'
+
+
+enum MyEnum2 { MyVal_B };
+// CHECK: |-EnumDecl 0x{{.}} imported in ModA.ModAFile1 MyEnum2
+// CHECK-NEXT: | |-also in ModB
+// CHECK-NEXT: | -EnumConstantDecl 0x{{.*}} imported in ModA.ModAFile1 referenced MyVal_B 'int' + + +typedef enum { MyVal_C } MyEnum3; +// CHECK: |-EnumDecl 0x{{.*}} imported in ModA.ModAFile1 <undeserialized declarations> +// CHECK-NEXT: | |-also in ModB +// CHECK-NEXT: |
-EnumConstantDecl 0x{{.}} imported in ModA.ModAFile1 referenced MyVal_C 'int'
+// CHECK-NEXT: |-TypedefDecl 0x{{.}} imported in ModA.ModAFile1 hidden MyEnum3 'enum MyEnum3':'MyEnum3'
+// CHECK-NEXT: | -ElaboratedType 0x{{.*}} 'enum MyEnum3' sugar imported +// CHECK-NEXT: |
-EnumType 0x{{.}} 'MyEnum3' imported
+// CHECK-NEXT: | -Enum 0x{{.*}} '' + + +// In this case, no merging happens on the EnumDecl in Objective-C, and ASTWriter writes both EnumConstantDecls when building ModB. +enum { MyVal_D }; +// CHECK: |-EnumDecl 0x{{.*}} imported in ModA.ModAFile1 hidden <undeserialized declarations> +// CHECK-NEXT: |
-EnumConstantDecl 0x{{.}} imported in ModA.ModAFile1 hidden MyVal_D 'int'
+
+
+// Redeclarations coming from ModB.
+// CHECK: |-TypedefDecl 0x{{.}} prev 0x{{.}} imported in ModB MyEnum1 'enum MyEnum1'
+// CHECK-NEXT: | -ElaboratedType 0x{{.*}} 'enum MyEnum1' sugar imported +// CHECK-NEXT: |
-EnumType 0x{{.}} 'enum MyEnum1' imported
+// CHECK-NEXT: | -Enum 0x{{.*}} 'MyEnum1' + +// CHECK: |-EnumDecl 0x{{.*}} prev 0x{{.*}} imported in ModB <undeserialized declarations> +// CHECK-NEXT: | |-also in ModB +// CHECK-NEXT: |
-EnumConstantDecl 0x{{.}} imported in ModB MyVal_C 'int'
+// CHECK-NEXT: |-TypedefDecl 0x{{.}} prev 0x{{.}} imported in ModB MyEnum3 'enum MyEnum3':'MyEnum3'
+// CHECK-NEXT: | -ElaboratedType 0x{{.*}} 'enum MyEnum3' sugar imported +// CHECK-NEXT: |
-EnumType 0x{{.}} 'MyEnum3' imported
+// CHECK-NEXT: | -Enum 0x{{.*}} '' + +// CHECK: |-EnumDecl 0x{{.*}} imported in ModB <undeserialized declarations> +// CHECK-NEXT: |
-EnumConstantDecl 0x{{.}} first 0x{{.*}} imported in ModB referenced MyVal_D 'int'
+
+//--- module.modulemap
+module ModA {
- module ModAFile1 {
- header "ModAFile1.h"
- export *
- }
- module ModAFile2 {
- header "ModAFile2.h"
- export *
- } +} +// The goal of writing ModB is to test that ASTWriter can handle the merged AST nodes correctly. +// For example, a stale declaration in IdResolver can cause an assertion failure while writing the identifier table. +module ModB {
- header "ModBFile.h"
- export * +}
- +//--- ModAFile1.h +#include "shared.h"
- +//--- ModAFile2.h +// Including this file, triggers loading of the module ModA with nodes coming ModAFile1.h being hidden.
- +//--- ModBFile.h +// ModBFile depends on ModAFile2.h only. +#include "ModAFile2.h"
+// Including shared.h here causes Sema to merge the AST nodes from shared.h with the hidden ones from ModA. +#include "shared.h" + + +//--- source.m +#include "ModBFile.h" + +int main() { return MyVal_A + MyVal_B + MyVal_C + MyVal_D; }