BUG: Excessive memory usage loading Dataframe with mixed data types from HDF5 file saved in "table" format · Issue #37441 · pandas-dev/pandas (original) (raw)

Code Sample

Environment setup:

conda create -n bug_test python=3.8 pandas pytables numpy psutil
conda activate bug_test

Test code:

import psutil import numpy as np import pandas as pd import os import gc

random_np = np.random.randint(0, 1e16, size=(25000000,4)) random_df = pd.DataFrame(random_np) random_df['Test'] = np.random.rand(25000000,1) random_df.set_index(0, inplace=True) random_df.sort_index(inplace=True) random_df.to_hdf('test.h5', key='random_df', mode='w', format='table')

del random_np del random_df gc.collect()

initial_memory_usage = psutil.Process(os.getpid()).memory_info().rss

random_df = pd.read_hdf('test.h5') print(f'Memory Usage According to Pandas: {random_df.sizeof()/1000000000:.2f}GB') print(f'Real Memory Usage: {(psutil.Process(os.getpid()).memory_info().rss - initial_memory_usage)/1000000000:.2f}GB')

random_df.index = random_df.index.copy(deep=True) print(f'Memory Usage After Temp Fix: {(psutil.Process(os.getpid()).memory_info().rss - initial_memory_usage)/1000000000:.2f}GB')

del random_df gc.collect() print(f'Memory Usage After Deleting Table: {(psutil.Process(os.getpid()).memory_info().rss - initial_memory_usage)/1000000000:.2f}GB')

Problem description

The above code generates a 1GB df table with mixed data types and saves it to a HDF5 file in "table" format.

Loading the HDF5 file back, we expect it to use 1GB of memory instead it uses 1.8GB of memory. I have found that the issue is with the index of the df. If I do a deep copy and replace it with the copy, the excessive memory usage goes away and memory usage is 1GB as expected.

I have initially encountered this issue when using Pandas 1.0.5 but I have tested this on Pandas 1.1.3 and the issue still exists.

When I was investigating the bug by going through the code of Pandas 1.0.5, I noticed that PyTables was used to read the HDF5 file and returns a NumPy structured array. Dataframes were created using this NumPy array and pd.concat was used to combine them into a single df. The pd.concat makes a copy of the original data instead of just pointing to the NumPy array. However, the index of the combined table still points to the original NumPy array. I think this explains the excessive memory usage because GC cannot collect the NumPy array since there still a reference to it.

Due to significant code changes to the read_hdf in Pandas 1.13, I did not have time to find out if this is still the same problem or another problem.

Expected Output

1GB df table should use 1GB of memory instead of 1.8GB

Output of pd.show_versions()

INSTALLED VERSIONS

commit : db08276
python : 3.8.5.final.0
python-bits : 64
OS : Linux
OS-release : 4.19.104-microsoft-standard
Version : #1 SMP Wed Feb 19 06:37:35 UTC 2020
machine : x86_64
processor : x86_64
byteorder : little
LC_ALL : None
LANG : C.UTF-8
LOCALE : en_US.UTF-8

pandas : 1.1.3
numpy : 1.19.2
pytz : 2020.1
dateutil : 2.8.1
pip : 20.2.4
setuptools : 50.3.0.post20201006
Cython : None
pytest : None
hypothesis : None
sphinx : None
blosc : None
feather : None
xlsxwriter : None
lxml.etree : None
html5lib : None
pymysql : None
psycopg2 : None
jinja2 : None
IPython : None
pandas_datareader: None
bs4 : None
bottleneck : None
fsspec : None
fastparquet : None
gcsfs : None
matplotlib : None
numexpr : 2.7.1
odfpy : None
openpyxl : None
pandas_gbq : None
pyarrow : None
pytables : None
pyxlsb : None
s3fs : None
scipy : None
sqlalchemy : None
tables : 3.6.1
tabulate : None
xarray : None
xlrd : None
xlwt : None
numba : None