pandas (original) (raw)

a bunch of the complaints are about e.g. np.random.randn, not clear how to resolve

probably need to submit some fixes upstream

is getting this passing viable?

imo not with the current review process, even though I normally put the errors in the OP for typing fixes

I'm now going to add the errors directly to code here, so it that it may be easier to identify the problems (and the low hanging fruit)

I may open another PR that sits on top of this with the fixes so that it is easier to see the reason for the code changes from the diff

(if this process is more successful, could maybe do the same for check-untyped-defs, many fixes were sorted 12 months ago, trying to get them into the codebase is a nightmare)