bpo-28929: Add to Misc/NEWS by Mariatta · Pull Request #112 · python/cpython (original) (raw)
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
Conversation8 Commits4 Checks0 Files changed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
[ Show hidden characters]({{ revealButtonHref }})
Mention bpo-28929 in the Documentation section of:
- What's New in Python 3.7.0 alpha 1?
- What's New in Python 3.6.1 release candidate 1?
- What's New in Python 3.5.4 release candidate 1?
http://bugs.python.org/issue28929
mention bpo-28929 in the Documentation section of:
- What's New in Python 3.7.0 alpha 1?
- What's New in Python 3.6.1 release candidate 1?
- What's New in Python 3.5.4 release candidate 1?
http://bugs.python.org/issue28929
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We typically don't worry about covering NEWS entries more than once in a single copy of the file since it's redundant information at that point; as long as someone reading the release notes in a release can see the news entry somewhere then that's enough.
@@ -700,6 +700,8 @@ C API |
---|
Documentation |
------------- |
- bpo-28929: Link the documentation to its source file on GitHub |
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Missing a period.
@@ -909,6 +911,8 @@ Windows |
---|
Documentation |
------------- |
- bpo-28929: Link the documentation to its source file on GitHub |
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is unnecessary as the same bit of information is picked up in the 3.7 release notes.
@@ -4095,6 +4099,17 @@ C API |
---|
instead of TypeError on programmical error in parsing format string. |
What's New in Python 3.5.4 release candidate 1? |
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is also unnecessary.
I suppose it doesn't need backport then. But please re-add the labels if I'm mistaken.
You can still backport into the appropriate sections, I'm just saying you don't need it more than once in the file at any one time.
And I'm now on vacation so I'll let someone else approve. 😀
Ah ok I think I got it now 😅 Re-added the backport labels.
Please enjoy your vacation!
This was referenced
Feb 25, 2017
akruis referenced this pull request in stackless-dev/stackless
akruis referenced this pull request in stackless-dev/stackless
…s and test_xml_etree
Disable the recently added test methods test_copy() and test_pickle() in test_dictviews, test_generators and test_xml_etree. Theses test assure that objects can't be copied or pickled, but Stackless can copy/pickle them.
https://bitbucket.org/stackless-dev/stackless/issues/112
akruis referenced this pull request in stackless-dev/stackless
Fix the recently added test test_pdb.test_pdb_issue_20766. This test depends on undefined behaviour of C-Python (invalid value of frame.f_lineno if frame.f_trace is None). Stackless-Python behaves differently, if soft-switching is enabled. This change disables soft-switching for this test.
https://bitbucket.org/stackless-dev/stackless/issues/112
akruis referenced this pull request in stackless-dev/stackless
akruis referenced this pull request in stackless-dev/stackless
akruis referenced this pull request in stackless-dev/stackless
akruis pushed a commit to akruis/cpython that referenced this pull request
akruis pushed a commit to akruis/cpython that referenced this pull request
akruis pushed a commit to akruis/cpython that referenced this pull request
akruis pushed a commit to akruis/cpython that referenced this pull request
akruis pushed a commit to akruis/cpython that referenced this pull request
akruis pushed a commit to akruis/cpython that referenced this pull request
akruis pushed a commit to akruis/cpython that referenced this pull request
akruis pushed a commit to akruis/cpython that referenced this pull request
akruis pushed a commit to akruis/cpython that referenced this pull request
akruis pushed a commit to akruis/cpython that referenced this pull request
akruis pushed a commit to akruis/cpython that referenced this pull request
akruis pushed a commit to akruis/cpython that referenced this pull request
akruis pushed a commit to akruis/cpython that referenced this pull request
- Change the product and file names to Stackless (Python).
- Add Stackless include files
- Update the Product and Download URLs
(cherry picked from commit 0c1f53c)
akruis pushed a commit to akruis/cpython that referenced this pull request
akruis pushed a commit to akruis/cpython that referenced this pull request
- Change the product and file names to Stackless (Python).
- Add Stackless include files
- Update the Product and Download URLs
jaraco pushed a commit that referenced this pull request
Change the behavior for when deciding when miss-islington should merge the PR.
Previously it checks if the PR has one core dev who approved the PR. But that is unreliable because the review may be dismissed later, or another core dev might decide not to backport the PR anymore.
The "awaiting merge" label is a better indicator that the PR is ready for merge.
Adjust tests.
Fixes python/miss-islington#62
This was referenced
Feb 11, 2025
Labels
Documentation in the Doc dir