bpo-31270: Simplify documentation of itertools.zip_longest by raphaelm · Pull Request #3200 · python/cpython (original) (raw)
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
Conversation8 Commits1 Checks0 Files changed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
[ Show hidden characters]({{ revealButtonHref }})
Hello, and thanks for your contribution!
I'm a bot set up to make sure that the project can legally accept your contribution by verifying you have signed the PSF contributor agreement (CLA).
Unfortunately our records indicate you have not signed the CLA. For legal reasons we need you to sign this before we can look at your contribution. Please follow the steps outlined in the CPython devguide to rectify this issue.
Thanks again to your contribution and we look forward to looking at it!
CLA is signed and submitted. Do I need to write a NEWS entry for this? I think it's rather "skip news", right?
Thanks @raphaelm, I think news can be skipped for this one :)
Hi @Mariatta, thanks for the quick answer! :)
I prefer code that is closer to the actual implementation:
def zip_longest(*args, **kwds):
# zip_longest('ABCD', 'xy', fillvalue='-') --> Ax By C- D-
fillvalue = kwds.get('fillvalue')
iterators = [iter(it) for it in args]
num_active = len(iterators)
while True:
values = []
for i, it in enumerate(iterators):
if it is None:
value = fillvalue
else:
try:
value = next(it)
except StopIteration:
num_active -= 1
value = fillvalue
iterators[i] = None
values.append(value)
if not num_active:
return
yield tuple(values)
Also, please keep the leading whitespace the same as the original. Likewise, don't introduce blank lines into the code equivalents.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
See alternate implementation in the comments.
A Python core developer has requested some changes be made to your pull request before we can consider merging it. If you could please address their requests along with any other requests in other reviews from core developers that would be appreciated.
Once you have made the requested changes, please leave a comment on this pull request containing the phrase I didn't expect the Spanish Inquisition!
. I will then notify any core developers who have left a review that you're ready for them to take another look at this pull request.
Moving this to an alternate pull request #3427