bpo-29026: Clarify documentation of time.time by appeltel · Pull Request #34 · python/cpython (original) (raw)
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
Conversation14 Commits3 Checks0 Files changed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
[ Show hidden characters]({{ revealButtonHref }})
Clarify the documentation of time.time by more
precisely defining what is meant by "seconds since
the epoch" on most platforms. Additionally explain
how gmtime and localtime may be used to extract
calendar components and convert to a more common
date format.
https://bugs.python.org/issue29026
Clarify the documentation of time.time by more precisely defining what is meant by "seconds since the epoch" on most platforms. Additionally explain how gmtime and localtime may be used to extract calendar components and convert to a more common date format.
Thank you for the new doc. It contains more info on timezone (UTC) and leap seconds (excluded).
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry, I saw a few more minor issues.
On Windows and most Unix systems, the epoch is January 1, 1970, |
---|
00:00:00 (UTC) and leap seconds are not counted towards the time |
in seconds since the epoch. This is commonly referred to as |
`Unix time https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unix\_time`_. |
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
IMHO it's worth it to repeat here:
To find out what the epoch is on a given platform, look at gmtime(0)
.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@@ -572,12 +579,27 @@ The module defines the following functions and data items: |
---|
.. function:: time() |
Return the time in seconds since the epoch as a floating point number. |
Return the time in seconds since the epoch as a floating point |
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You should add a link on the "epoch" word to its definition.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
1970. To find out what the epoch is, look at ``gmtime(0)``. |
---|
* The :dfn:`epoch` is the point where the time starts, and is platform |
dependent. For Unix, the epoch is January 1, 1970, 00:00:00 (UTC). |
To find out what the epoch is on a given platform, look at ``gmtime(0)``. |
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I assume gmtime(0)
is time.gmtime(0)
here. If I'm correct, we can use this as an opportunity to make it clearer.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I changed it to time.gmtime(0)
where it first appears in d387bf7. However, when the statement is repeated in the documentation of time.time
, I retain gmtime(0)
as this appears to be the convention used in all the function docs for the module.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oops, failed to amend commit before pushing, I fixed to use doc conventions in 263a4f4
* The term :dfn:`seconds since the epoch` refers to the total number |
of elapsed seconds since the epoch, typically excluding |
`leap seconds https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leap\_second`_. |
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd say add
.. leap seconds
: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leap_second
and use
everytime you need the Wikipedia article.
(I might the syntax got wrong so please try first :))
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Added in d387bf7, also changed one other mention of leap seconds to link.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Whoops, failed to add to amended commit before push - added that other mention in 263a4f4
Codecov Report
Merging #34 into master will increase coverage by
0.01%
.
The diff coverage isn/a
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #34 +/- ##
Coverage 82.37% 82.38% +0.01%
Files 1427 1428 +1
Lines 350948 351138 +190- Hits 289088 289294 +206
- Misses 61860 61844 -16
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update e7ffb99...263a4f4. Read the comment docs.
Mariatta referenced this pull request in Mariatta/cpython
- bpo-29026: Clarity documentation of time.time
Clarify the documentation of time.time by more precisely defining what is meant by "seconds since the epoch" on most platforms. Additionally explain how gmtime and localtime may be used to extract calendar components and convert to a more common date format.
bpo-29026: Minor improvements for time.time doc
bpo-29026: Consistency fixes for time.time doc
(cherry picked from commit 23557d5)
Mariatta referenced this pull request in Mariatta/cpython
- bpo-29026: Clarity documentation of time.time
Clarify the documentation of time.time by more precisely defining what is meant by "seconds since the epoch" on most platforms. Additionally explain how gmtime and localtime may be used to extract calendar components and convert to a more common date format.
bpo-29026: Minor improvements for time.time doc
bpo-29026: Consistency fixes for time.time doc
(cherry picked from commit 23557d5)
Mariatta added a commit that referenced this pull request
(cherry picked from commit 23557d5)
Mariatta added a commit that referenced this pull request
(cherry picked from commit 23557d5)
ghost mentioned this pull request
tiran pushed a commit to tiran/cpython that referenced this pull request
munmap pages on shutdown, keep FILE open
jaraco pushed a commit that referenced this pull request
Instead of in the main app.
jaraco pushed a commit to jaraco/cpython that referenced this pull request
oraluben pushed a commit to oraluben/cpython that referenced this pull request
fix: mark interpreter frames as tier 2 or not
Test: Added tests for python#33
Co-authored-by: Ken Jin 28750310+Fidget-Spinner@users.noreply.github.com
nanjekyejoannah pushed a commit to nanjekyejoannah/cpython that referenced this pull request
…h_recent_assumptions
Warn for string cmp with new string warning assumptions
This was referenced
Feb 11, 2025