bpo-33082: Include multiprocessing Pool callback in example & docstrings by chadmiller-amzn · Pull Request #6455 · python/cpython (original) (raw)
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
[ Show hidden characters]({{ revealButtonHref }})
Also make the callback docs more clear as to how data flows.
Callbacks are executed in the main process. The callback input values are the
return values of the called function, when that function exits, or an exception
instance in error_callbacks if it is raised.
https://bugs.python.org/issue33082
Also make the callback docs more clear as to how data flows.
Callbacks are executed in the main process. The callback input values are the return values of the called function, when that function exits, or an exception instance in error_callbacks if it is raised.
chadmiller-amzn changed the title
Include multiprocessing Pool callback in example & docstrings bpo-33082: Include multiprocessing Pool callback in example & docstrings
Awaiting review of 2.7 version of PR (#6122)
@applio, please check the comments on this PR, GH-6122, and the bug tracker. @pitrou agrees with the doc change, but he wasn't sure if the coding example should be changed. I believe Ned was hoping for a second opinion.
Per the discussion in issue33082, closing this PR.